Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Authors Intentions

Tue, 7 Apr 2009, 07:13 pm
Paul Treasure39 posts in thread
Okay, this is a serious question for me... A number of different posts recently have gotten quite seriously into Dramatic Theory, and one thing that keeps popping up is "The Author's Intention". Now, when I was younger I had Roland Barthes' theory of "The Death of the Author" drummed into me. To try and put it simply - The meaning of any work of art or literature is the meaning that the reader/watcher gets from it, and any interpretation is valid as long as the text bears it out, and what the author originally intended is largely irrelevant... (My apologies if I put it clumsily, it WAS YEARS ago) But this was a literary/philosophical theory, not a purely dramatic one. My question is: Has Roland Barthes been thrown out and someone forgot to forward me the memo? or, As his theory is a general literary theory not a specific dramatic one, has it just not filtered through to the performing arts? Can't say I'm losing sleep over it or anything, but it has piqued my interest :-)

To the comments a few comments back...

Mon, 13 Apr 2009, 10:33 am

I have been reading along with quite a bit of interest. As a playwright I have been criticised for being too 'vague' and for giving too much stage direction. Believe it or not these two go hand in hand. I'm a very visual and kinesthetic person, if I want to say something I don't always use words. So maybe I use an audio or visual cue to emphasise a metaphor or a point. Dramaturgy or ajudication has often asked me to just come out and say it. Instead of having:

 Mike: You Suck (He sighs as the Rain begins to Pour) 

I have quite literally been asked to change it to:

Mike: You Suck, and this makes me feel depressed. (Okay maybe not that bad)

Now as someone who has directed my own work, but also handed my scripts onto someone else to direct, I can see the point of being more obtuse. I know what the metaphors mean, I know the subtext, but how does the director? The actor? The audience? Then again, as the author maybe that was my intention all along...to leave it open to interpretation. Maybe what I originally intended for Mike, isn't as interesting, or as meaningful as the final interpretation.

(Because this paragraph is quite vague, my husband reading over my shoulder has told me to say what I actually mean)

I think that whenever someone views art, reads a novel, attends a play they get something different out of it from what the creator originally intended. Tolkien has often said that there is no underlying analagy, or allegory in his work, and that TLOR is simply a story, with no other intention than entertainment. If the rest of us want to draw deeper meaning than that, it is our perogative, and authors intention has little to do with it. The concept applys if I write something with a clear intention and a deeper meaning, don't spell it out and no one catches on.

Thread (39 posts)

← Back to Green Room Gossip