Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Amateur versus Community

Sun, 29 Oct 2006, 12:03 pm
Logos25 posts in thread

When did we start using Community rather than Amateur and why? I can still remember a time when the word amateur was proudly worn by a number of theatre companys. After all the word means basically " for the love of" and means far more than unpaid. The top skilled amateurs are not far from professional in ability and the best companies manage very high production values indeed. I have to say that the Scouts are getting quite frightening from that point of view.

Community Theatre at least in the seventies menat something else entirely and related to professional company's working in and with the general community companys like Junction and Troupe here in Adelaide. Exploring local issues and producing performance pieces addressing those issues. They caot a fortune to run of course and as funding became harder and harder in the eighties and ninties they vanished.

So back to the first question. Are we no longer proud of amateur status, is it something we try to avoid as a label. Do we feel that the term community theatre has a better image. Any thoughts.

So waddya suggest???

Mon, 30 Oct 2006, 11:32 pm
Na naturally noted; "The problem with these terms is that they are too ambiguous." Agreed. The same thing happens with music. I write bizarre musical noises that people say is unmarketable because they can't pigeon-hole it as "brand X". I happen to call it "music", and that seems to work. Is the same true of theatre in its myriad forms? To quote Zappa's "Joe's Garage Act 3"; ...."and ultimately, who gives a f*@# anyway??" El "It ain't braggin' if you can back it up."- Jaco Pastorius

Thread (25 posts)

← Back to Green Room Gossip