Amateur versus Community

Sun, 29 Oct 2006, 12:03 pm

Logos25 posts in thread

When did we start using Community rather than Amateur and why? I can still remember a time when the word amateur was proudly worn by a number of theatre companys. After all the word means basically " for the love of" and means far more than unpaid. The top skilled amateurs are not far from professional in ability and the best companies manage very high production values indeed. I have to say that the Scouts are getting quite frightening from that point of view.

Community Theatre at least in the seventies menat something else entirely and related to professional company's working in and with the general community companys like Junction and Troupe here in Adelaide. Exploring local issues and producing performance pieces addressing those issues. They caot a fortune to run of course and as funding became harder and harder in the eighties and ninties they vanished.

So back to the first question. Are we no longer proud of amateur status, is it something we try to avoid as a label. Do we feel that the term community theatre has a better image. Any thoughts.

I think that theatre is

Sun, 5 Nov 2006, 01:58 pm

grantwatson

I think that theatre is theatre. Whether you do it for money or do it for free, acting is acting, directing is directing and so on. Professional theatre doesn't bother to tell everyone that it's professional - it's just theatre. Why should unpaid theatre have to distinguish itself separately? For the paying audience, a play is a play, and how much everyone involved got paid makes no difference to the person watching the show. I've acted professionally and acted for free, and I can honestly state that I put as much effort and thought into the free gigs as I did the paid ones, and I suspect you all would say the same about yourselves. Stop selling yourselves short: theatre is theatre.

Thread (25 posts)

Threaded Flat

Amateur versus Community— Logos29 Oct 2006

Presentation— Labrug29 Oct 2006
I personally prefer the— Na29 Oct 2006
Not to wax anti-semantic...— Bass Guy29 Oct 2006
My local— Na30 Oct 2006
- So waddya suggest???— Bass Guy30 Oct 2006
It's a bit ironic that I— Logos31 Oct 2006
- Pro-Patronise— Labrug31 Oct 2006
  - As for choosing only to do— Na31 Oct 2006
Soup Cans!— Tari-Xalyr31 Oct 2006
- Learning from each other— Labrug31 Oct 2006
I've just seen an advert— Logos31 Oct 2006
Well, for what it is worth,— Robert Whyte31 Oct 2006
its a matter of overlapping but not equivalent definitions folks— Craig K Edwards31 Oct 2006
What's in a name— Alex Nicol31 Oct 2006
We've had this discussion— Na31 Oct 2006
- Let's all just call— Daniel Kershaw31 Oct 2006
  - Sole Figure— Labrug31 Oct 2006
A thought— Na31 Oct 2006
There's a lady here in— Logos1 Nov 2006
I agree...— Na1 Nov 2006
- Investigate— Labrug2 Nov 2006
I think that theatre is— grantwatson5 Nov 2006
- Thank god you're here— Labrug5 Nov 2006
we're not alone— Craig K Edwards6 Nov 2006

← Back to Green Room Gossip