Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Amateur versus Community

Sun, 29 Oct 2006, 12:03 pm
Logos25 posts in thread

When did we start using Community rather than Amateur and why? I can still remember a time when the word amateur was proudly worn by a number of theatre companys. After all the word means basically " for the love of" and means far more than unpaid. The top skilled amateurs are not far from professional in ability and the best companies manage very high production values indeed. I have to say that the Scouts are getting quite frightening from that point of view.

Community Theatre at least in the seventies menat something else entirely and related to professional company's working in and with the general community companys like Junction and Troupe here in Adelaide. Exploring local issues and producing performance pieces addressing those issues. They caot a fortune to run of course and as funding became harder and harder in the eighties and ninties they vanished.

So back to the first question. Are we no longer proud of amateur status, is it something we try to avoid as a label. Do we feel that the term community theatre has a better image. Any thoughts.

My local

Mon, 30 Oct 2006, 03:19 pm
I think local is also too broad. My 'local' theatre would be Flying Bookworm (professional TIE company) who happen to live in my road. Or perhaps the 'local' amateur group would be Hartwell Players... Or even more local - my own company, which is professional. The problem with these terms is that they are too ambiguous. The Prompt Copy Networking emerging theatre professionals www.thepromptcopy.com Sticky Apple Legs http://stickyapplelegs.artsblogs.com Puppets in Melbourne www.freewebs.com/puppetsinmelbourne

Thread (25 posts)

← Back to Green Room Gossip