Bumpy Angels
Sun, 2 July 2000, 12:07 pmWalter Plinge27 posts in thread
Bumpy Angels
Sun, 2 July 2000, 12:07 pmHello everyone! Well, lets see if we can cause some more controversy!(not that that's what i set out to do)
Bumpy Angels is a strange mish-mash of song, personal revelation (and even) game show. Unfortunately I was put off from the beginning with the intolerably long procession of "brides" which had no relevance to any later scenes - merely some sort of masque to get us in the mood (and failing). Firstly the backstage crew were laughable - taking ages just to move a cupboard and later making mistakes (coming in and off in half light) and then very audiblely chastising/discussing backstage - to was so bad the audience couldn't help but giggle. Mind you, we were already in a bemused state after being subjected to various snatches of song which are incredibly cheesy and I think lent nothing to the play - they could all be cut and play would lose nothing (might even gain a bit of dramatic credibility). By the interval I was pleased with the dramatic tension set up between characters and the audience was certainly emotionally involved - some of us rather uncomfortably so! But then it just kept coming! Coral and Felicity-Elizabeth's monologues were quite touching and well performed - but then everybody had to get in on the act, confessing every dark secret and troubled soul. Destroying most of the poignancy and subtlety of the play we were sledgehammered with emotion until the unsatisfying conclusion. High praise must goto the Mother Superior, who showed excellent charactisation and crystal clear vocal technique. Singing numbers were a little ragged and out of time and of course not all of us can be singers (Angela and Amy's song certainly made us long for a chorus number) but Your CHeatin' Heart was an absolute delight. All in all an emotion packed and interesting show, which cheapens itself through lack of any subtlety and its silly songs.
Bumpy Angels is a strange mish-mash of song, personal revelation (and even) game show. Unfortunately I was put off from the beginning with the intolerably long procession of "brides" which had no relevance to any later scenes - merely some sort of masque to get us in the mood (and failing). Firstly the backstage crew were laughable - taking ages just to move a cupboard and later making mistakes (coming in and off in half light) and then very audiblely chastising/discussing backstage - to was so bad the audience couldn't help but giggle. Mind you, we were already in a bemused state after being subjected to various snatches of song which are incredibly cheesy and I think lent nothing to the play - they could all be cut and play would lose nothing (might even gain a bit of dramatic credibility). By the interval I was pleased with the dramatic tension set up between characters and the audience was certainly emotionally involved - some of us rather uncomfortably so! But then it just kept coming! Coral and Felicity-Elizabeth's monologues were quite touching and well performed - but then everybody had to get in on the act, confessing every dark secret and troubled soul. Destroying most of the poignancy and subtlety of the play we were sledgehammered with emotion until the unsatisfying conclusion. High praise must goto the Mother Superior, who showed excellent charactisation and crystal clear vocal technique. Singing numbers were a little ragged and out of time and of course not all of us can be singers (Angela and Amy's song certainly made us long for a chorus number) but Your CHeatin' Heart was an absolute delight. All in all an emotion packed and interesting show, which cheapens itself through lack of any subtlety and its silly songs.
RE: Secret Squirrel
Tue, 4 July 2000, 11:35 pm Q: How many theatre reviewers and/or critics does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: All of them -
1 to be highly critical of the design elements,
1 to express contempt for the glow of the lamp,
1 to exagerate the temperature co-efficeint of other lightbulds
1 to lambast the interpretation of wattage used,
1 to critique the performance of the bulb itself,
1 to sprout the virtue of being a fluro performance as opposed to just ordinary incandescent shows
1 to review the value of ac and dc
1 to recall superb lightbulbs of past seasons and lament how this one fails to measure up,
Another to question if would not be better push it in rather then screw it
and the t'other who proceeds to screw it anyway,
-AND-
ALL to join in the refrain reflecting on how they could build a better light bulb in their sleep.
Joe McCabe
A: All of them -
1 to be highly critical of the design elements,
1 to express contempt for the glow of the lamp,
1 to exagerate the temperature co-efficeint of other lightbulds
1 to lambast the interpretation of wattage used,
1 to critique the performance of the bulb itself,
1 to sprout the virtue of being a fluro performance as opposed to just ordinary incandescent shows
1 to review the value of ac and dc
1 to recall superb lightbulbs of past seasons and lament how this one fails to measure up,
Another to question if would not be better push it in rather then screw it
and the t'other who proceeds to screw it anyway,
-AND-
ALL to join in the refrain reflecting on how they could build a better light bulb in their sleep.
Joe McCabe
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···