Bumpy Angels
Sun, 2 July 2000, 12:07 pmWalter Plinge27 posts in thread
Bumpy Angels
Sun, 2 July 2000, 12:07 pmHello everyone! Well, lets see if we can cause some more controversy!(not that that's what i set out to do)
Bumpy Angels is a strange mish-mash of song, personal revelation (and even) game show. Unfortunately I was put off from the beginning with the intolerably long procession of "brides" which had no relevance to any later scenes - merely some sort of masque to get us in the mood (and failing). Firstly the backstage crew were laughable - taking ages just to move a cupboard and later making mistakes (coming in and off in half light) and then very audiblely chastising/discussing backstage - to was so bad the audience couldn't help but giggle. Mind you, we were already in a bemused state after being subjected to various snatches of song which are incredibly cheesy and I think lent nothing to the play - they could all be cut and play would lose nothing (might even gain a bit of dramatic credibility). By the interval I was pleased with the dramatic tension set up between characters and the audience was certainly emotionally involved - some of us rather uncomfortably so! But then it just kept coming! Coral and Felicity-Elizabeth's monologues were quite touching and well performed - but then everybody had to get in on the act, confessing every dark secret and troubled soul. Destroying most of the poignancy and subtlety of the play we were sledgehammered with emotion until the unsatisfying conclusion. High praise must goto the Mother Superior, who showed excellent charactisation and crystal clear vocal technique. Singing numbers were a little ragged and out of time and of course not all of us can be singers (Angela and Amy's song certainly made us long for a chorus number) but Your CHeatin' Heart was an absolute delight. All in all an emotion packed and interesting show, which cheapens itself through lack of any subtlety and its silly songs.
Bumpy Angels is a strange mish-mash of song, personal revelation (and even) game show. Unfortunately I was put off from the beginning with the intolerably long procession of "brides" which had no relevance to any later scenes - merely some sort of masque to get us in the mood (and failing). Firstly the backstage crew were laughable - taking ages just to move a cupboard and later making mistakes (coming in and off in half light) and then very audiblely chastising/discussing backstage - to was so bad the audience couldn't help but giggle. Mind you, we were already in a bemused state after being subjected to various snatches of song which are incredibly cheesy and I think lent nothing to the play - they could all be cut and play would lose nothing (might even gain a bit of dramatic credibility). By the interval I was pleased with the dramatic tension set up between characters and the audience was certainly emotionally involved - some of us rather uncomfortably so! But then it just kept coming! Coral and Felicity-Elizabeth's monologues were quite touching and well performed - but then everybody had to get in on the act, confessing every dark secret and troubled soul. Destroying most of the poignancy and subtlety of the play we were sledgehammered with emotion until the unsatisfying conclusion. High praise must goto the Mother Superior, who showed excellent charactisation and crystal clear vocal technique. Singing numbers were a little ragged and out of time and of course not all of us can be singers (Angela and Amy's song certainly made us long for a chorus number) but Your CHeatin' Heart was an absolute delight. All in all an emotion packed and interesting show, which cheapens itself through lack of any subtlety and its silly songs.
RE: Secret Squirrel
Tue, 4 July 2000, 06:13 pmWalter Plinge
Amateur theatre has a bad rep because it is believed that amateur = bad. The wider community won't see amateur shows for that very reason. That's it. We can tell them how good our stuff is till we're blue in the face but they still won't come. And even if they did they probably wouldn't appreciate what we do. They won't overlook the homemade sets and costumes, the halls instead of theatres and the varying levels of talent, simply because they haven't experienced it themselves. Trust me, many times I have invited non-theatre people to shows and no matter how good it is for an amateur company they still expect every actor to have trained at NIDA and each company to have a professional budget. Amateur theatre has a bad rep due to ignorance from the community and lack of finances.
I did not say that SS has no right to dislike the show. If you read my earlier posts you will see that. Anyone is welcome to like or dislike any work they choose. AND they certianly don't require an education to buy a ticket and enjoy a piece of theatre they don't grasp on an intellectual level.
However, I believe that no one has the right to trash any show simply because they don't like it.
If you want to review it at least have the knowledge to back up what you say.
I'm not interested in a reviewer who simply says, "It was great" or "It was crap". Tell my why it was great or why it was crap but offer educated advice if you think something should be improved. And for God's sake, don't be rude about it and don't try to tell people how to do something you know nothing about.
I did not say that SS has no right to dislike the show. If you read my earlier posts you will see that. Anyone is welcome to like or dislike any work they choose. AND they certianly don't require an education to buy a ticket and enjoy a piece of theatre they don't grasp on an intellectual level.
However, I believe that no one has the right to trash any show simply because they don't like it.
If you want to review it at least have the knowledge to back up what you say.
I'm not interested in a reviewer who simply says, "It was great" or "It was crap". Tell my why it was great or why it was crap but offer educated advice if you think something should be improved. And for God's sake, don't be rude about it and don't try to tell people how to do something you know nothing about.
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···