how do you evaluate a director's work?
Thu, 26 Mar 2009, 05:59 pmLisa Skryp49 posts in thread
how do you evaluate a director's work?
Thu, 26 Mar 2009, 05:59 pmI have been reflecting on my reactions to theatre that I see.
As an actor who has yet to tackle directing, I realise I generally look at things from that point of view. My observations re: lighting/set design/sound are generally minimal - unless it is particularly amazing or dreadful. Sad I know, but true.
As to the direction of a show, it is a similar thing for me; unless someone makes some very different thematic/interpretive/stylistic departure from the expected, I don't tend to notice & the lucky actors get all the credit for a great show.
To me it would seem that if a director has done a good job, no one will really notice, as the show will flow smoothly, tell the tale effectively & captivate as it should.
Just wondering - how do you evaluate a director's work? What are your thoughts on this, folks?
And we're yet to see any validity to your argument.
Sun, 12 Apr 2009, 01:56 pmYou're not following your own logic.
It's been established that 'good enough to direct professionally' can equate to 'finds opportunities for creative outlet in community theatre'.
You're still trying to base your objections on 'does unpolished community theatre therefore can't work professionally'.
The argument you're trying to impose has nothing to do with the initial premise established.
If you're going to insist on being a troll, you really ought to be less easy to shoot down in flames.
Cheers,
Craig
~<8>-/====\---------