how do you evaluate a director's work?
Thu, 26 Mar 2009, 05:59 pmLisa Skryp49 posts in thread
how do you evaluate a director's work?
Thu, 26 Mar 2009, 05:59 pmI have been reflecting on my reactions to theatre that I see.
As an actor who has yet to tackle directing, I realise I generally look at things from that point of view. My observations re: lighting/set design/sound are generally minimal - unless it is particularly amazing or dreadful. Sad I know, but true.
As to the direction of a show, it is a similar thing for me; unless someone makes some very different thematic/interpretive/stylistic departure from the expected, I don't tend to notice & the lucky actors get all the credit for a great show.
To me it would seem that if a director has done a good job, no one will really notice, as the show will flow smoothly, tell the tale effectively & captivate as it should.
Just wondering - how do you evaluate a director's work? What are your thoughts on this, folks?
good point, Mike
Tue, 7 Apr 2009, 04:48 pmI agree with Mike's shop metaphor to a certain extent. Not just in terms of direction, but in all aspects of theatre (& other performing arts) I see, I often find it difficult to just experience the show, without thinking of all that goes into the production, ie) the actual work done by the actors, designers, backstage, and yes, even the directors :-)
I guess that this is an occupational hazard for anyone involved in the performing arts, however a truly good production will transport me from the technical aspects onto a purely experiential level. Must say that doesn't happen all that often, but when it does, even for mere moments, it's magic.