Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

under rehearsed

Tue, 24 Aug 2010, 01:43 pm
Gordon the Optom33 posts in thread

Generally the standard of community theatre is excellent, each person pulls their weight and everyone has a good night, audience and cast together. However, recently, I have seen three shows which were well directed, had experienced actors and yet were struggling due to lack of rehearsal.

I have even seen a few veteran actors who do not seem to be tuned in – dare I even say disinterested? Possibly they think that they are there just to ‘fill in’, or capable of performing their part without any real effort.

Sadly, the result is that not only do they label themselves as second rate, but cause some amateur theatres to be constantly avoided by the public because ‘their shows are always very poor.’ It is very sad that the odd badly rehearsed show, or lazy actor, can put an unjustified bad label on future productions for that theatre or group for months to come.

To all those who bring my life so much pleasure, a very big thank you.

I think you hit it on the

Wed, 25 Aug 2010, 07:49 am
I think you hit it on the head later. Getting a wider range of people down to audition is the only real way to stop the drain. You have to engage the theatre community as a whole though. I don't think an actor should tie themselves solely to one community theatre group. It will allow them to inject there ideas into new groups and vice versa. Thus we wouldn't have to worry about groups going stale with similar ideas every show. BAck to the main point though, I think it's a shame indeed. Surely the director is to blame here? He is the one who can call more rehearsals or get on the actors backs and demand they rehearse more at home. Whilst the actor should be able to work it out for themselves if they can't the director must step up to the plate. It's not a Wolf, It's an Alaskan Malamute.

Thread (33 posts)

← Back to Billboard Bulletins