Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

under rehearsed

Tue, 24 Aug 2010, 01:43 pm
Gordon the Optom33 posts in thread

Generally the standard of community theatre is excellent, each person pulls their weight and everyone has a good night, audience and cast together. However, recently, I have seen three shows which were well directed, had experienced actors and yet were struggling due to lack of rehearsal.

I have even seen a few veteran actors who do not seem to be tuned in – dare I even say disinterested? Possibly they think that they are there just to ‘fill in’, or capable of performing their part without any real effort.

Sadly, the result is that not only do they label themselves as second rate, but cause some amateur theatres to be constantly avoided by the public because ‘their shows are always very poor.’ It is very sad that the odd badly rehearsed show, or lazy actor, can put an unjustified bad label on future productions for that theatre or group for months to come.

To all those who bring my life so much pleasure, a very big thank you.

Back to Gordon's original posting...

Mon, 30 Aug 2010, 03:17 pm
In my observation, most community theatre shows include actors ranging from very experienced to inexperienced. Among them, you also get a sub-range of fast-learners and slow-learners. The director has to try to pull it all together without putting anyone's nose out of joint. If the fast-learning experienced actors are prepared to help their slower, less experienced cast-mates, it makes it much easier. Sometimes though, for whatever reason, they don't all peak at the same time; hence you get the impression that the whole thing is under-rehearsed. I like the logos formula though. Ssstinger>>>

Thread (33 posts)

← Back to Billboard Bulletins