Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Cry Havoc

Thu, 22 Oct 2009, 08:52 am
Gordon the Optom46 posts in thread

‘Cry Havoc’ is written and directed by Grant Watson. Produced by Graeme Watson, it is an Idea ex Machina production, in conjunction with the Blue Room. The play is being performed at The Blue Room Theatre, 53 James Street, Northbridge, until 7th November. All shows 7.00 pm,
 

         As the US Republican President, James Freeman (Peter Nettleton) is addressing the people he comes to a grinding halt, folds away his papers and says ‘I am fed up with not giving the people what they need, we have failed you all’. The White House Chief of Staff, Marc Douglas (Peter Clark) almost has a fit, it is his job to create policies and advise the Party how to carry out their aims, and here is a loose cannon at the helm. Douglas calls in the Press Secretary, Hank (Michael Lamont – who got a spontaneous burst of applause for a particularly fine piece of acting) and his colleague, Director of Communications, Bronwyn Hopkins (Sonia Marcon) to try and draw up a speech to re-exert the Party’s authority.

       The Speaker of the House of Representatives – in the US is a extremely political post, not like our independent, neutral Speaker – Cassandra Ford (Mia Martin) has very powerful feelings on the subject; perhaps replace the President with the Vice President (Kingsley Judd). As all of the dirty tricks brigades are working, they are under the watchful eye of the Intelligence Analysts (Amy Welsh and Clinton Ward). How will the unwanted swing in party line be resolved?

Writer, Grant Watson, has produced an amazing script from what I thought would be a dry subject. With clever dialogue, he most convincingly shows the politicians woodenly, relating the same old insincere platitudes to the people, and then as soon as the cameras are turned off, treating their staff like dirt, whilst plotting the next devious step in their career. The script is as good as any found in TV or cinema.

There were many similarities to ‘Julius Caesar’, with backstabbing, a war in another country, parallels to Cassius convincing Brutus that Caesar has become too powerful and popular. A similar triumvirate is formed and Anthony’s equivalent cried for havoc. All beautifully woven into this storyline. Should there be any confusion, and I doubt if you will have any trouble, the programme has a very good glossary of the terms used.

The set is black, with the cast in grey or black – truly depicting some of the dangerous ‘Grey men’, similar to whom Princess Dianna referred.

At two hours long, with a break of 15 minutes, instead of the ennui of politics, the audience could not wait to get back into the theatre for the second half. With a superb cast, of well-known names from professional and community theatre, the quality of acting was outstanding.

This slick, disturbing and memorable play had the rare honour of the audience stamping feet and clapping enthusiastically, as they demanded a curtain call from the outstanding cast.

Isn't though the purpose to

Mon, 26 Oct 2009, 02:26 pm
Isn't though the purpose to adopt accent a contextual matter that identifies place and setting? Also, I feel Grant, that the justification you have offered is more of an excuse as oppose to justification based on artistic merit. Well I don't think it's an excuse, but then naturally I wouldn't. To be completely honest I have seen not one theatrical production in my life where actors have put on accents where I haven't become distracted by it, or haven't noticed that their performance is suffering because they're focusing so heavily on making sure their Irish accent doesn't suddenly sound Canadian, or their American accent shifts from California to Alabama. I saw one particular production in London a few years ago where an otherwise exceptional play was dragged into outright disaster because one actor out of fifteen couldn't sustain a believable accent. So why take the risk? The audience is already accepting a stage as a physical place, and costumes as authentic clothing, and performances as people to engage with and believe in - why is their voice any different? I think suspension of disbelief can stretch a little further than that without snapping - for most of us, anyway.

Thread (46 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews