Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Cry Havoc

Thu, 22 Oct 2009, 08:52 am
Gordon the Optom46 posts in thread

‘Cry Havoc’ is written and directed by Grant Watson. Produced by Graeme Watson, it is an Idea ex Machina production, in conjunction with the Blue Room. The play is being performed at The Blue Room Theatre, 53 James Street, Northbridge, until 7th November. All shows 7.00 pm,
 

         As the US Republican President, James Freeman (Peter Nettleton) is addressing the people he comes to a grinding halt, folds away his papers and says ‘I am fed up with not giving the people what they need, we have failed you all’. The White House Chief of Staff, Marc Douglas (Peter Clark) almost has a fit, it is his job to create policies and advise the Party how to carry out their aims, and here is a loose cannon at the helm. Douglas calls in the Press Secretary, Hank (Michael Lamont – who got a spontaneous burst of applause for a particularly fine piece of acting) and his colleague, Director of Communications, Bronwyn Hopkins (Sonia Marcon) to try and draw up a speech to re-exert the Party’s authority.

       The Speaker of the House of Representatives – in the US is a extremely political post, not like our independent, neutral Speaker – Cassandra Ford (Mia Martin) has very powerful feelings on the subject; perhaps replace the President with the Vice President (Kingsley Judd). As all of the dirty tricks brigades are working, they are under the watchful eye of the Intelligence Analysts (Amy Welsh and Clinton Ward). How will the unwanted swing in party line be resolved?

Writer, Grant Watson, has produced an amazing script from what I thought would be a dry subject. With clever dialogue, he most convincingly shows the politicians woodenly, relating the same old insincere platitudes to the people, and then as soon as the cameras are turned off, treating their staff like dirt, whilst plotting the next devious step in their career. The script is as good as any found in TV or cinema.

There were many similarities to ‘Julius Caesar’, with backstabbing, a war in another country, parallels to Cassius convincing Brutus that Caesar has become too powerful and popular. A similar triumvirate is formed and Anthony’s equivalent cried for havoc. All beautifully woven into this storyline. Should there be any confusion, and I doubt if you will have any trouble, the programme has a very good glossary of the terms used.

The set is black, with the cast in grey or black – truly depicting some of the dangerous ‘Grey men’, similar to whom Princess Dianna referred.

At two hours long, with a break of 15 minutes, instead of the ennui of politics, the audience could not wait to get back into the theatre for the second half. With a superb cast, of well-known names from professional and community theatre, the quality of acting was outstanding.

This slick, disturbing and memorable play had the rare honour of the audience stamping feet and clapping enthusiastically, as they demanded a curtain call from the outstanding cast.

This may possibly fuel the

Mon, 26 Oct 2009, 04:48 pm
This may possibly fuel the fire but... If we approach all plays with your point of view noway, where do we stop? Should I, in the production of Othello I am in at the moment, start performing with an Elizabethan accent? For those of you wondering what that sounds like here 'tis: http://www.pronouncingshakespeare.com/op-recordings/ Or perhaps seeing as the play is set in Venice I should put on an italian accent... You would be suprised what an audience will accept if you tell them that is the case. Shakespeare certainly does it all the time, at the start of any play all the characters will explicitly state three of four times where they are, this is also one of the reasons why shakespeare has his characters announce their deaths or has others do it for them, apart from perhaps a red scarf dropping from the characters hand there would have been no blood packs or gore, so the playwright uses the most powerful tool of the theatre: the willing suspension of disbelief. All this is a moot point anyway considering that Grant wrote Cry Havoc as well as directed it and I don't think that his direction is going to compromise his own intentions. I agree with you, if you are trying to create a play in the style of realism then a strict attention should be paid to the accents, indeed some writers go so far as to write the correct accent in for you, Sean O'casey is probably the best example of this... or David Mamet. However, I don't think Grant was trying to create realism with "Cry Havoc" I would class it as Naturalism and for me it even verges on belonging to the Epic Theatre. In fact the lack of accents creates a wonderful piece of verfremdungseffekt... but I am going to leave that one alone lest I ignite a Brecht war. What I will say is that having seen this production and planning to see it again, the accents don't matter. I was enthralled from start to finish, I even wanted to yell some abuse at some of the characters from time to time and I went away still thinking about this production, its intended messages and its unintended messages and found myself wondering about how twisted are our own forms of government? This for me in every way makes "Cry Havoc" a success, well written, well performed and well recieved. If you haven't seen it, SEE IT!

Thread (46 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews