Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Much Ado About Nothing - Grads

Mon, 10 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
leecetheartist14 posts in thread

A Rambling Review by Alicia Smith. 

Once again Stephen Lee brings us a little known Shakespeare and presents it with infectious delight.

We went to see it on Saturday night, and you would think that after 7 straight performances you would start to see some cracks. But no, the acting was fast paced and energetic, and at times the audience were in tears of laughter.

It's an interesting play and one I haven't seen before, except for the 1st third of the Brannagh version. While being primarily a comedy, there's a really dark thread that runs through it partway, which is an interesting contrast.

Mr Lee has set this in the 1920's, in keeping with the original play's post war scenario, people are looking for relaxation and diversion - and the role of woman in society is being questioned. The jazz score works beautifully, highlighting the beauty of the flapper and other costumes. Lovely clothes.

The wedding scene is played very sensitively, it is very emotionally charged...

This is chiefly a comedy though, and there are some scenes...particularly the Benedict (David Gregory) under the table scene.

This is a play that really ought to be better known, and this is the production to introduce you to it. Actually, I wish this had been the play I'd been made to study to death, instead of Hamlet. It's a lot more accessible to a modern audience, and the interplay between the characters, Claudio (Chris McInnes) & Hero (Perfectly cast the sweet Sara Young), Beatrice (Wonderfully played by Julia Dalby) and Benedict particularly, the tricks and shennanigans.

As well as the darker consequences of  the brooding, bitter, Don John's actions make for great drama. I like the touch of Don John's (Rodney Vermeij) little toy, you'll know it when you see it. It really added something and was quite startling. Has someone finally solved the problem of giving actors something to do with their hands?

 And then there is the wonderful proto-Inspetor-Clouseau where Shakespeare's mastery of language and Dogberry's (Grant Malcolm's) delivery is superb and quite hilarious. Mrs Pinns (Joanne Williams) of the Neighbourhood Watch's arrest technique is something to look out for.

If you wanted to introduce kids to Shakespeare, you could do worse than this one, I was sitting next to a young teen, and she was rapt, so it wasn't just me.

I can't mention everyone, because I'd just go on and on, but there was some very interesting interplay going on in the backgrounds that was more than worth a second glance, and as this is a play about rumour and gossip, it's very appropriate. Esmerald Rocha, as Conrade the reporter is worth keeping an eye on, and is really expressive without even saying a word. 

 This production is well worth seeing, and at the New Fortune, it's being seen as it was in Shakespeare's time and it's all good really.

You may still see it on the 11th through to the 15th of March, at The New Fortune Theatre at UWA.

Sitting at the side is good viewing if you can manage it. 

This review can also be read at the lympago forums as well as at Alicia's livejournal.

Copyright 2008 Alicia Smith

Alicia draws for a living at Alicia Smith Artworks - Wonderful Things

I would just like to say

Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 09:31 pm
Walter Plinge
I would just like to say that I have to disagree. I went to that play and then left at half time. That's how much I didn't enjoy it. I thought the acting was overdone and much of it seemed to be done in the old style of Shakespearean acting. And by that I mean, when you watch a 1950's film version and everyone is yelling for some reason. I have seen this play done numerous times, and also have seen the GRADS' productions for the last few years and I have on the whole enjoyed GRADs. Basically what I am saying is there was an entire lack of subtlety. When you do Shakespeare, with all those beautiful lines and words, you should do more than just yell the lines. I'm sorry, I don't mean to be harsh. In fact, I wasn't even going to write a review, but I really hate when I read reviews and all they write is nice stuff when the play did not deserve anything. And by the way, I know this is only a minor thing, but didn't it piss anyone else off that every so often, the characters would enter whilst doing the Charleston? I understand it's set in the twenties, I got that from the costumes. And why did Julia Dalby have to act out everything she said? Look I'll stop. It just annoys me when there is a play that I love and a company that I love and they do a poor ass job. I think a lot of the blame lies with the director rather than the actors. I could tell they were talented actors, I think the director just took the wrong slant with this.

Thread (14 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews