Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Much Ado About Nothing - Grads

Mon, 10 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
leecetheartist14 posts in thread

A Rambling Review by Alicia Smith. 

Once again Stephen Lee brings us a little known Shakespeare and presents it with infectious delight.

We went to see it on Saturday night, and you would think that after 7 straight performances you would start to see some cracks. But no, the acting was fast paced and energetic, and at times the audience were in tears of laughter.

It's an interesting play and one I haven't seen before, except for the 1st third of the Brannagh version. While being primarily a comedy, there's a really dark thread that runs through it partway, which is an interesting contrast.

Mr Lee has set this in the 1920's, in keeping with the original play's post war scenario, people are looking for relaxation and diversion - and the role of woman in society is being questioned. The jazz score works beautifully, highlighting the beauty of the flapper and other costumes. Lovely clothes.

The wedding scene is played very sensitively, it is very emotionally charged...

This is chiefly a comedy though, and there are some scenes...particularly the Benedict (David Gregory) under the table scene.

This is a play that really ought to be better known, and this is the production to introduce you to it. Actually, I wish this had been the play I'd been made to study to death, instead of Hamlet. It's a lot more accessible to a modern audience, and the interplay between the characters, Claudio (Chris McInnes) & Hero (Perfectly cast the sweet Sara Young), Beatrice (Wonderfully played by Julia Dalby) and Benedict particularly, the tricks and shennanigans.

As well as the darker consequences of  the brooding, bitter, Don John's actions make for great drama. I like the touch of Don John's (Rodney Vermeij) little toy, you'll know it when you see it. It really added something and was quite startling. Has someone finally solved the problem of giving actors something to do with their hands?

 And then there is the wonderful proto-Inspetor-Clouseau where Shakespeare's mastery of language and Dogberry's (Grant Malcolm's) delivery is superb and quite hilarious. Mrs Pinns (Joanne Williams) of the Neighbourhood Watch's arrest technique is something to look out for.

If you wanted to introduce kids to Shakespeare, you could do worse than this one, I was sitting next to a young teen, and she was rapt, so it wasn't just me.

I can't mention everyone, because I'd just go on and on, but there was some very interesting interplay going on in the backgrounds that was more than worth a second glance, and as this is a play about rumour and gossip, it's very appropriate. Esmerald Rocha, as Conrade the reporter is worth keeping an eye on, and is really expressive without even saying a word. 

 This production is well worth seeing, and at the New Fortune, it's being seen as it was in Shakespeare's time and it's all good really.

You may still see it on the 11th through to the 15th of March, at The New Fortune Theatre at UWA.

Sitting at the side is good viewing if you can manage it. 

This review can also be read at the lympago forums as well as at Alicia's livejournal.

Copyright 2008 Alicia Smith

Alicia draws for a living at Alicia Smith Artworks - Wonderful Things

Thread (14 posts)

leecetheartistMon, 10 Mar 2008, 10:43 am

A Rambling Review by Alicia Smith. 

Once again Stephen Lee brings us a little known Shakespeare and presents it with infectious delight.

We went to see it on Saturday night, and you would think that after 7 straight performances you would start to see some cracks. But no, the acting was fast paced and energetic, and at times the audience were in tears of laughter.

It's an interesting play and one I haven't seen before, except for the 1st third of the Brannagh version. While being primarily a comedy, there's a really dark thread that runs through it partway, which is an interesting contrast.

Mr Lee has set this in the 1920's, in keeping with the original play's post war scenario, people are looking for relaxation and diversion - and the role of woman in society is being questioned. The jazz score works beautifully, highlighting the beauty of the flapper and other costumes. Lovely clothes.

The wedding scene is played very sensitively, it is very emotionally charged...

This is chiefly a comedy though, and there are some scenes...particularly the Benedict (David Gregory) under the table scene.

This is a play that really ought to be better known, and this is the production to introduce you to it. Actually, I wish this had been the play I'd been made to study to death, instead of Hamlet. It's a lot more accessible to a modern audience, and the interplay between the characters, Claudio (Chris McInnes) & Hero (Perfectly cast the sweet Sara Young), Beatrice (Wonderfully played by Julia Dalby) and Benedict particularly, the tricks and shennanigans.

As well as the darker consequences of  the brooding, bitter, Don John's actions make for great drama. I like the touch of Don John's (Rodney Vermeij) little toy, you'll know it when you see it. It really added something and was quite startling. Has someone finally solved the problem of giving actors something to do with their hands?

 And then there is the wonderful proto-Inspetor-Clouseau where Shakespeare's mastery of language and Dogberry's (Grant Malcolm's) delivery is superb and quite hilarious. Mrs Pinns (Joanne Williams) of the Neighbourhood Watch's arrest technique is something to look out for.

If you wanted to introduce kids to Shakespeare, you could do worse than this one, I was sitting next to a young teen, and she was rapt, so it wasn't just me.

I can't mention everyone, because I'd just go on and on, but there was some very interesting interplay going on in the backgrounds that was more than worth a second glance, and as this is a play about rumour and gossip, it's very appropriate. Esmerald Rocha, as Conrade the reporter is worth keeping an eye on, and is really expressive without even saying a word. 

 This production is well worth seeing, and at the New Fortune, it's being seen as it was in Shakespeare's time and it's all good really.

You may still see it on the 11th through to the 15th of March, at The New Fortune Theatre at UWA.

Sitting at the side is good viewing if you can manage it. 

This review can also be read at the lympago forums as well as at Alicia's livejournal.

Copyright 2008 Alicia Smith

Alicia draws for a living at Alicia Smith Artworks - Wonderful Things

Antonia RMon, 17 Mar 2008, 02:08 pm

oops-

Hi just to let you know you misspelt the following names: Hero - Sarah Young Conrade - Esmeralda Rocha
Walter PlingeSun, 23 Mar 2008, 09:31 pm

I would just like to say

I would just like to say that I have to disagree. I went to that play and then left at half time. That's how much I didn't enjoy it. I thought the acting was overdone and much of it seemed to be done in the old style of Shakespearean acting. And by that I mean, when you watch a 1950's film version and everyone is yelling for some reason. I have seen this play done numerous times, and also have seen the GRADS' productions for the last few years and I have on the whole enjoyed GRADs. Basically what I am saying is there was an entire lack of subtlety. When you do Shakespeare, with all those beautiful lines and words, you should do more than just yell the lines. I'm sorry, I don't mean to be harsh. In fact, I wasn't even going to write a review, but I really hate when I read reviews and all they write is nice stuff when the play did not deserve anything. And by the way, I know this is only a minor thing, but didn't it piss anyone else off that every so often, the characters would enter whilst doing the Charleston? I understand it's set in the twenties, I got that from the costumes. And why did Julia Dalby have to act out everything she said? Look I'll stop. It just annoys me when there is a play that I love and a company that I love and they do a poor ass job. I think a lot of the blame lies with the director rather than the actors. I could tell they were talented actors, I think the director just took the wrong slant with this.
Grant MalcolmSun, 23 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm

And I'd like to say...

Sheesh Kate, I'm glad you left at half time! Who knows what you would have made of the Watch if you'd stayed after interval.

You're fully entitled to your point of view and I can appreciate that a very few people might not enjoy the "slant" on this production - personally, I have no patience for people who whinge about Shakespeare in modern dress. But a difference over interpretation is a  very different thing to labelling the production a "poor ass job". This was a rock solid production with fine performances, clear through lines and energy, great costumes, evocative props and furnishings and effective lighting and sound. If minor things that are entirely in tune with the rest of the production are pissing me off, then I know there's something skewed about my reaction to a show as a whole. I wonder what was tempering your response?

Maybe you did feel that "the play did not deserve anything", but if you're going to provide any balance in your review, you would have to acknowledge that you were in a tiny (solitary?) minority. Your report of overdone "old style of Shakespearean acting", "entire lack of subtlety" and yelling of lines is completely at odds with the responses of hundreds that laughed, cried and spontaneously applauded throughout the run of the season. 

Yes, Leece's rambling reviews have been known to go a little OTT* in accentuating the positive and nearly eliminating the negative, but IMNSHO* Stephen Lee is one of the finest directors to have worked in the New Fortune Theatre and his Much Ado was the best GRADS Shakespeare in the season's thirteen year run - and I've directed or performed in eight of them!

Cheers
Grant

* OTT - Over The Top

* IMNSHO - In My Not So Humble Opinion - or maybe it is somewhat humble, because I'm putting Stephen's production ahead of the three that I've directed for the New Fortune!

--
Director, actor and administrator of this website

Walter PlingeMon, 24 Mar 2008, 09:57 am

Finally! Someone who sees

Finally! Someone who sees director Stephen Lee for the pretentious twit that he really is...
alanmMon, 24 Mar 2008, 01:16 pm

Interesting to note

Interesting to note that the negative comments came from people who either weren't members or who hadn't signed in. Another case for members only being able to post perhaps? By the way, I'm really disappointed I missed the show, I've heard plenty of positive comments.
StuartPTue, 25 Mar 2008, 11:10 am

Didst thou laugh?

Unfortunately it's been awhile since I watched the production so I can't recall too many details to really comment. But I remember as not much of a shakespeare person I was able to keep track of what was going on and had a few good laughs. I think I would have to agree that Kate and Barry are in the minority. I would suggest Kate, that it might of been necessary to 'shout' the lines to ensure that everyone in the theatre could hear them. No roof, multiple levels of seating, people scattered around... I imagine making sure you're heard is a challenge. But, I didn't feel that all the lines were 'shouted'. And Alan, I think anonymous posting is important. As much as many people disagree with the views expressed by our two negative posters, they are entitled to their opinion. And while anyone involved in the production should take their opinions with a grain (Or a tablespoon) of salt, it's important for people to be able to air their views. If you start restricting posting to members only I believe you'd find far less reviews in general, positive or negative. We humans are a sloth like race and the effort of signing up will deter many of us. =) Anyway, enough ranting. Well done to the cast and crew. A fine performance in my opinion. Loved in particular the man with the moustache who shaved in the name of love. The "zombie chef" turned watch was lovely, as was the rest of the watch actually. Dripping with character. Kate and Barry, perhaps if you decide to "review" again in future you could try to be a bit more constructive and a little less offensive?
David GregoryTue, 25 Mar 2008, 04:10 pm

Finally! Another Pretentious Twit!

Good on ya Barry. You F@#King stream of dog pizzle. Oh poor baby, did Steve not give you a part once and the only comment you can make is that HE'S a pretentious twit. Don't going throwing stones me old, out of the proverbial glass house you piece of shit. Steve Lee is a genius, with an ability to direct comedy that I have never witnessed as an actor. By all means pan on me, tell me how crap I was, that the production was BLah, and she was BLAH, and He did that, but for anyone to say that Stephen is anything other than a hugely talented visionary has never worked with true directorial inspiration as he offers. Thanks to everyone for your comments, your criticism either positive or negative is always welcome, personal assaults on people working in community theatre ain't. My thanks
LogosTue, 25 Mar 2008, 10:36 pm

Interesting

Now if I was going to moderate anything on this thread (which I'm not)it would be the completely offensive post by David Gregory. Even though he is a registered member of the site. that all there is? Well if that's all there is my friend, then let's keep dancing. www.tonymoore.id.au
Tim ProsserTue, 25 Mar 2008, 11:18 pm

Hasty departure?

I presume that's Mr Gregory in his attached picture - bags packed for a hasty departure after his ill-considered outburst. Quite possibly a prudent course of action, I would suggest.
David GregoryWed, 26 Mar 2008, 09:56 am

My apologies

My apologies to all I have offended, although as a member for well over a year, I have read some pretty damning and offensive material directed at people who just want to put on theatre. Ill-considered maybe, but this endless barrage on people is unfair, and for some anonymnous (I won't say it) person to call a peer in the industry ridiculous names is insulting. Yes, I reacted badly, I should not let private problems externalise into an assault on a third party. So again, sorry.
Walter PlingeWed, 26 Mar 2008, 04:52 pm

Stephen Lee is a jerk.

Stephen Lee is a jerk.
Daniel KershawSat, 29 Mar 2008, 09:47 am

bycott this website

You know what else is shit? The few dickheads with moderating power who think it is their right to editorialise everything they disagree with. THIS IS A PUBLIC WEBSITE, FREE FOR ANYONE TO USE. I am going to stop posting on this website.
Grant MalcolmSat, 29 Mar 2008, 10:44 am

More boycotts

Thanks for raising this, Daniel. 

Every member on the site has capacity to vote posts and comments up and down. Depending on your comment preferences this may reduce a comment to a title when viewing a post but it will not remove it from a list. Voting for a post may promote it to the home page, but voting it down will not cause it to be removed.

I have noticed recently that a member with permission to mark items as potential spam may have used this as a means of unpublishing posts and comments. I have written to these members informing them that this is inappropriate use of this facility.

Please be aware though that, in line with the site's terms and conditions of use, if I receive a complaint regarding defamatory or illegal information or content that infringes copy or other intellectual property rights, I will act to remove information.

If you have any specific concerns about particular posts or comments, please don't hesitate to ask.

Regards
Grant 

--
Director, actor and administrator of this website

← Back to Theatre Reviews