Les Mis
Sat, 22 Oct 2005, 06:44 amWalter Plinge82 posts in thread
Les Mis
Sat, 22 Oct 2005, 06:44 amHi!
I am currently in London and not able to see the production, has anybody been to see the show yet? Can someone give me review!
Thanks:)
*Don't Dream It, Be It*
I am currently in London and not able to see the production, has anybody been to see the show yet? Can someone give me review!
Thanks:)
*Don't Dream It, Be It*
Re: Les Mis
Wed, 2 Nov 2005, 06:27 pmWalter Plinge
by defining my opinions as wrong u are degrading me and making me feel as though i should believe what u believe and believe that john milson is the best director in the world and the show was absolutely marvellous
dont u dare tell me im wrong, cuz in actual fact, an opinion can never be wrong or right
stop being contradictory in what u say:
1) its alright to have an opinion but ur opinion is wrong, an opinion seems to be only accetable or "right" when it agrees with yours and
2) John is tough and likes perfection, yet his show was "ruined by bad equipment"
if john milson is so great why is he not doing bigger and better things?
if he was in to perfection why did he not organise microphones for all cast? which would have ultimately made the performance a lot better?
its fine to disagree but u need to be put back in your box cuz u have not right telling me that im wrong
would u like me to tell u that u are WRONG WRONG WRONG because the show was not the greatest i had seen. so u HAVE to feel the same as i do about the performance?
i never said that John Milson is the WORST director in the world, i said i have low respect for him as a director cuz i find his work seems half assed
i didnt say he was half assed, and i didnt get personal with him...i described how i felt about abot him on a professional basis, AS a director.
so think about what u have to say, because one day someone may tell u how u feel is WRONG, just as u did to me
of course u would have a bias in favour of the show anyways, U WERE IN IT...sometimes it takes an outsider to realise that things arent always so fine and dandy!
oh yeah, and i think like a lot of other people, the show was less than satisfactory in all aspects
dont u dare tell me im wrong, cuz in actual fact, an opinion can never be wrong or right
stop being contradictory in what u say:
1) its alright to have an opinion but ur opinion is wrong, an opinion seems to be only accetable or "right" when it agrees with yours and
2) John is tough and likes perfection, yet his show was "ruined by bad equipment"
if john milson is so great why is he not doing bigger and better things?
if he was in to perfection why did he not organise microphones for all cast? which would have ultimately made the performance a lot better?
its fine to disagree but u need to be put back in your box cuz u have not right telling me that im wrong
would u like me to tell u that u are WRONG WRONG WRONG because the show was not the greatest i had seen. so u HAVE to feel the same as i do about the performance?
i never said that John Milson is the WORST director in the world, i said i have low respect for him as a director cuz i find his work seems half assed
i didnt say he was half assed, and i didnt get personal with him...i described how i felt about abot him on a professional basis, AS a director.
so think about what u have to say, because one day someone may tell u how u feel is WRONG, just as u did to me
of course u would have a bias in favour of the show anyways, U WERE IN IT...sometimes it takes an outsider to realise that things arent always so fine and dandy!
oh yeah, and i think like a lot of other people, the show was less than satisfactory in all aspects
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···