Les Mis
Sat, 22 Oct 2005, 06:44 amWalter Plinge82 posts in thread
Les Mis
Sat, 22 Oct 2005, 06:44 amHi!
I am currently in London and not able to see the production, has anybody been to see the show yet? Can someone give me review!
Thanks:)
*Don't Dream It, Be It*
I am currently in London and not able to see the production, has anybody been to see the show yet? Can someone give me review!
Thanks:)
*Don't Dream It, Be It*
Re: Les Mis
Mon, 24 Oct 2005, 08:58 amWalter Plinge
I saw Les Miserables on Saturday night.
I had seen the production in 2001 and was very impressed with the standard of the chorus and principals.
I have also seen Les Mis on the west end a few years ago, which was looking a little tired but still very good.
I must say i was very disappointed with this production.
The chorus did a good job, but at times couldnt be heard because of the directors staging and the orchestra too loud.
Principals were what let me down, not all I will add, but most.
Fantine acted well for most of it, but the 'Broadway Belt" and almost yelling for her songs I thought quite bad. I dreamed a dream lost all its impact for me.
Jean Valjean sang quite well but was very wooden on stage. I felt no emotion at all with this character, which it certainly needs.
I felt that alot of the principals looked uneasy on stage, whether they hadnt done a lot of amature theatre or lack of rehearsal time etc?
The sets......sorry what sets besides the baracade were very poor.
A white cyc through most of the show isnt exactly exciting to watch. I dont mind minimalism but ??
I , like Alex's brother nearly went to sleep during alot of it.
I remember the 2001 production well and dont remember so many blackouts and waiting in the "near" dark for the next seen.
For me it was quite a disappointing show and in a way wasnt sure if I had wanted to see it......But after all this is only my opinion.
I would like to see others.
I suppose of an amature production it was ok, but as a pro-am production that it keeps getting billed as......I dont think so.
I have seen far better shows in this state produced on a 'shoe-sting' budget at smaller theatres and companies.
Another "red Herring" is the MS claim of all proceeds benifiting people with MS...........I see on this site you have been there before.
I had seen the production in 2001 and was very impressed with the standard of the chorus and principals.
I have also seen Les Mis on the west end a few years ago, which was looking a little tired but still very good.
I must say i was very disappointed with this production.
The chorus did a good job, but at times couldnt be heard because of the directors staging and the orchestra too loud.
Principals were what let me down, not all I will add, but most.
Fantine acted well for most of it, but the 'Broadway Belt" and almost yelling for her songs I thought quite bad. I dreamed a dream lost all its impact for me.
Jean Valjean sang quite well but was very wooden on stage. I felt no emotion at all with this character, which it certainly needs.
I felt that alot of the principals looked uneasy on stage, whether they hadnt done a lot of amature theatre or lack of rehearsal time etc?
The sets......sorry what sets besides the baracade were very poor.
A white cyc through most of the show isnt exactly exciting to watch. I dont mind minimalism but ??
I , like Alex's brother nearly went to sleep during alot of it.
I remember the 2001 production well and dont remember so many blackouts and waiting in the "near" dark for the next seen.
For me it was quite a disappointing show and in a way wasnt sure if I had wanted to see it......But after all this is only my opinion.
I would like to see others.
I suppose of an amature production it was ok, but as a pro-am production that it keeps getting billed as......I dont think so.
I have seen far better shows in this state produced on a 'shoe-sting' budget at smaller theatres and companies.
Another "red Herring" is the MS claim of all proceeds benifiting people with MS...........I see on this site you have been there before.
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···