Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Actors Vs Directors

Wed, 14 May 2003, 08:34 pm
Walter Plinge31 posts in thread
How much control should the director have in the the creative process of the bringing the character to life.

I have heard many actors complain about directors who don't give them space to create. Personally I prefer for the director to stay out of this process completley and just trust the actor.

What's your view?

Re: Quentin Tarantino vs 'all you other mutha f**kers'

Tue, 20 May 2003, 12:23 am
Jeffrey Watkins wrote:
>
> I watch "Minority Report" over the weekend and some of the
> Cast Interviews. Max Von Sydow made a very similar comment to
> some of those mentioned here when comparing SS to "Other"
> Directors.
> Now I won't quote him exactly as I can't remember EXACTLY
> what he said. BAsically, he deplored directors that took such
> control over the production as to stifle the actor's every
> move.
> SS on the other hand allowed the cast to "direct themselves"
> within the confines of the vision he had for the film.
>



I've just been watching the special feature interviews on the 'Reservoir Dogs' DVD. Quentin comes across as a director who knew EXACTLY what he wanted, got exactly those performances and shot it exactly HIS way.

But I also DON'T get the feeling that any of the actors felt stifled by this amount of control.

Obviously it depends on the project, the group, and a whole lot of trust in the process and the ideas, whatever form or path they take.





Probably the biggest part of a director's job is getting the casting right; the biggest part of an actor's job is showing the director how good they were at casting.


Cheers,
Craig

[%sig%]

Thread (31 posts)

Actors Vs DirectorsWalter Plinge14 May 2003
← Back to Green Room Gossip