Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Actors Vs Directors

Wed, 14 May 2003, 08:34 pm
Walter Plinge31 posts in thread
How much control should the director have in the the creative process of the bringing the character to life.

I have heard many actors complain about directors who don't give them space to create. Personally I prefer for the director to stay out of this process completley and just trust the actor.

What's your view?

Re: Actors Vs Directors

Thu, 15 May 2003, 12:04 pm
Walter Plinge
This is a very grey area to perfectly frank. It all depends on the Vision the director has for a performance. If they have a clear vision of what they hope to achieve then they will want to have more say in the development of a character. If however, they are looking for those rather special moments of creative improvisation, they will sit back and let the energy flow.

Both a clear vision and free-form style of directing have there place. Scripts sometimes work better in one style than the other.

I find it is not so much about the level of control the director exerts but the manner in which they exert their control. Either way, a director can be too ambiguous or too overbearing. A good director knows what he is looking for and is able to communicate this in a way that invites cooperation and in so doing commands respect as opposed to Demands respect.

This really comes down to personality, not direction.

Jeff Watkins

Thread (31 posts)

Actors Vs DirectorsWalter Plinge14 May 2003
← Back to Green Room Gossip