FTI vs PAC - Screen workshops, which is better?

I'd also like to know the answer to this question...i'm a little surprised no-one has answered it yet. From what I know, the FTI is more inclusive in that it welcomes people with all levels of acting experience. The PAC screen workshops, last time I checked, are more geared towards the more experienced actor. The FTI has a good reputation - they also offer a wider variety of courses in more areas of film-making. If you go on their website you can read testimonials and see where some of their graduates have ended up. From what I remember, some have achieved quite a bit of 'success'. The PAC workshops I think is run by Annie Murtagh-Monks (a WA casting agent), so this would probably be a useful contact to make in the industry. I think PAC probably looks better on a CV as well due to their bigger focus on acting, some notable alumni, and it being more for the experienced actor. Of course, I might be wrong. Also keep an eye out for NIDA and WAAPA because they also offer screen acting courses for the general public (among other acting courses) for a few weeks of the year. Sorry that's as much I know...hopefully now this post will be bumped up and someone with more knowledge will be able to answer your question more succinctly.