Britain clamps down on fringe and profit share theatre.
Fri, 3 July 2009, 09:48 amgrantwatson34 posts in thread
Britain clamps down on fringe and profit share theatre.
Fri, 3 July 2009, 09:48 amThere's a bit of a ruckus in the UK at the moment, due to Equity campaigning to force a national minimum wage for actors onto all fringe and profit share theatre productions. They argue any companies or performance groups who can't afford the thousands of pounds per week in wages most shows would require is to (a) magically source government funding and sponsorship, or (b) become amateur companies.
More info here (assuming this link works better than the last one).
Amateur and professional... a definition
Mon, 27 July 2009, 10:39 pmWalter Plinge
"Is that the only difference between an amateur and a professional?"
Technically, I believe it is. Amateurs are unpaid. Professionals are paid. Connotations concerning such things as the quality of the work, acting, staging, or the commitment of the participants have grown up around those words but I would argue that they should not be taken for granted. I have seen and participated in amateur work which would "stand up on any stage in the world..." and conversely, I shudder to remember the standard of some professional productions with which I worked.
It's true that 'professional' productions may have the sort of budget which should, in theory, enable them to meet a higher standard. Hence people use the word 'professional' as an adjective to connote a certain level of... say, 'professional behaviour' but nothing stops an amateur from behaving 'professionally'. He or she is still an amateur though, merely because they are unpaid.
Regards,
lollipop
- ···
- ···