Britain clamps down on fringe and profit share theatre.

It's been drawn to my attention that there may be a bit of confusion about what the actual issue is - in the article that started this thread, and then in my subsequent argument where I was supporting the Equity line. There's a significant difference between the National Minimum Wage (NMW) and the award rates that Equity consider its 'minimum' rates for professionals. Let it be stressed that the NMW is what the British article is all about. In Australia, the National Minimum Wage is currently $14.31 an hour. ($543.78 for a 38 hour week). Equity minimum is $865.86 for a class 1 performer, or $915.90 for class 2 (experienced). So even though it's (British) Equity, and yes they still advocate the higher rate for professional performance...that's NOT what the article is about. They're not cracking down on theatre groups who don't meet Equity Award standards, they're cracking down on fringe employers who pay below the National Minimum Wage - which is essentially illegal! And if these Fringe theatre groups can't even afford the NMW, all they need to do is admit to their amateur status...then they can do what they like with the paltry income they make, and if the actors are lucky they'll get their cab fare home...just like amateur groups everywhere. It's the employers who are basically ripping off their actors, trying to preserve all the business benefits of being considered 'professional', but using their 'Fringe' status as an excuse to not have to pay anyone...THAT'S who is being closed down by British Equity. And I still say, good on 'em. Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------