Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Because Stinger asked

Fri, 13 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
administrator23 posts in thread
Who is the Judge, Jury & Executioner here? Author: stinger Date: 13/02/2009 - 09:45 (a)Who decides if something posted on this website is defamatory? (b)What qualifications do they have to do so? (c)Who is said to have been defamed? (c)Since when has it been policy of this website to remove a post on the grounds of "defamatory information" anyway? If we all knew that we could have a post removed just by claiming that it contained defamatory material and requesting its removal, I suggest that there would be very little left on here. Also, it should be borne in mind that TRUTH is a complete defence to a claim of defamation. Come on 'Administrator' - let's have your reasons and satisfy our curiousity.Puzzled Ssstinger>>> *** (a) I sincerely don't believe anything posted on this website can constitute defamation. But I will act, as a matter of courtesy, on specific complaints regarding allegations of defamatory content. (b) No decision involved, no qualifications required. (c) Usually, by implication, the complainant. (d) Always. Please read the disclaimer (under the about menu). You are correct regarding the possible implications of this policy. Thanks for drawing that to everyone's attention. ;-) Cheers Grant

This should help you

Tue, 17 Feb 2009, 05:29 pm
What is defamation? http://www.artslaw.com.au/legalinformation/Defamation/DefamationLawsAfterJan06.asp For a defamation action to succeed, the person complaining of the defamation (the plaintiff) has to prove three things: that the communication has been published to a third person that the communication identifies (or is about) the plaintiff; and that the communication is defamatory. This should help you: http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Censor/defamation.html "Defamation is the publication of words or images to a person that damages the reputation of another ['slander' if spoken words, 'libel' if written words or images]. A defamatory statement is one that is likely to cause ordinary, reasonable people to think less of the person about whom the words or images are published. An inference that casts a defamatory imputation is enough to bring an action." 2006 laws were revised Federal Laws: Racial Discrimination Act 1975 Grounds of unlawful discrimination Race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin. Other unlawful conduct Racial hatred Areas covered provision of goods and services covered in this area Sex Discrimination Act 1984 Grounds of unlawful discrimination Sex, marital status, pregnancy, family responsibility (dismissal only). Other unlawful conduct Sexual harassment Areas covered goods, services and facilities; covered in this area Look up each state Anti Discrimination Act

Thread (23 posts)

← Back to Green Room Gossip