Because Stinger asked
Fri, 13 Feb 2009, 11:16 amadministrator23 posts in thread
Because Stinger asked
Fri, 13 Feb 2009, 11:16 amWho is the Judge, Jury & Executioner here?
Author: stinger
Date: 13/02/2009 - 09:45
(a)Who decides if something posted on this website is defamatory?
(b)What qualifications do they have to do so?
(c)Who is said to have been defamed?
(c)Since when has it been policy of this website to remove a post on the grounds of "defamatory information" anyway?
If we all knew that we could have a post removed just by claiming that it contained defamatory material and requesting its removal, I suggest that there would be very little left on here. Also, it should be borne in mind that TRUTH is a complete defence to a claim of defamation.
Come on 'Administrator' - let's have your reasons and satisfy our curiousity.Puzzled
Ssstinger>>>
***
(a) I sincerely don't believe anything posted on this website can constitute defamation. But I will act, as a matter of courtesy, on specific complaints regarding allegations of defamatory content.
(b) No decision involved, no qualifications required.
(c) Usually, by implication, the complainant.
(d) Always. Please read the disclaimer (under the about menu).
You are correct regarding the possible implications of this policy. Thanks for drawing that to everyone's attention.
;-)
Cheers
Grant
Taking Grant's Advice
Fri, 13 Feb 2009, 11:00 pm
Peter
What are you trying to say pal? That I'm paid by
various theatre companies?
You're obviously enjoying playing Devils Advocate
and throwing around sly innuendo, but I can see where you're pinned. Your
assumptions are very wrong and whoever your "very reliable source" is, they were
also very wrong.
But that's not stopping you is it.
You and I are going to put a stop to your nonsense,
I work in Fremantle, so do you, I'll pop around to your office Monday morning
and we'll sort it cock.
Greg Ross
Greg Ross
Minister for Good Times