Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Apocalypse NOW

Wed, 22 Oct 2008, 09:37 am
crgwllms14 posts in thread
Back in July I jumped on a thread to defend a concept I thought was interesting. I'd heard about it through the director & writer in person, and assisted them to promote the as-yet-unwritten play at the Blue Room Season Launch. I then came online here to find out what it was really about, got involved in some already involved discussion, decided it really was a concept I'd be keen to see bear fruit, and put my hand up to participate. Along the way I've been fascinated and amazed by the number of people who felt entitled to post forth an opinion without feeling they needed to qualify it, and were happy to centre their argument on a stance of closed-mindedness. I've always considered theatre (actually, art in general) to thrive on the possibility of new ideas...hence my original indignation when I entered the debate. Now I don't pretend that I don't have strong views, and can exert a certain arrogance in arguing them, but I hope my history shows that I always side on the concept of open-mindedness and seeing more than two sides to any argument. (Of course there have been many others here also with open minds, who have put forth much valid and reasonable debate.) At the time of my original post, while defending the project, I made no claim to guess if the outcome would be good or bad, successful or not...simply that it was an idea that at least deserved a good go rather than being shot down. Now with the combined talents of a good dramaturg, a good director, a good cast, a good lighting designer, and a good musician, I'm prepared to pre-judge the result and announce that: it's going to be good! Whether it's successful is now partly up to you, at least in terms of attendance. I feel confident that artistically it tells an interesting story well, so by that measure it's already a success. But now it's your turn. We'd all be fascinated to discover what people think, whether we meet or exceed expectations, whether you think our blustering confidence was actually able to deliver or not, whether the style works for you, and whether we've managed to entertain. I'm sure no one's missed the coincidence that we've put ourselves right back where we started, in the position to have our show criticised and commented upon by all who see it...or who don't. I hope if nothing else it shows that theatre has many possibilities, ideas can be drawn from all kinds of interesting places, stories about human feelings can create great drama, and that creative people can achieve the unthinkable when they refuse to listen to what most people think. See you in the bar afterwards. Cheers Craig ~<8>-/======\--------

Get your Write and your Wright right.

Thu, 23 Oct 2008, 12:57 am
I don't think Kate is claiming this. You're putting those words in her mouth. She's always acknowledged that the quotes come from other people. Er...that's what verbatim theatre IS. But this script is not a collaboration, and has never pretended to be. It’s one person’s creative concept, with material drawn from many existing sources. Those sources are acknowledged in the programme, and primarily in the open admission that this is verbatim theatre. And so the script is attributed to the one person primarily responsible for its creation and for its existing form. There is definitely a creator of this play. I call that a playwright...what would you have us call it? Similar examples exist throughout various artforms: Look up ‘verbatim theatre’, and refer to anything you find there. David Bowie, John Lennon, Kurt Cobain, the band Radiohead,…are a few examples of artists who have used the technique of cutting up an existing text and rearranging it to make new lyrics. William S Burroughs did this to create his poetry. Grimm’s Fairy Tales were compiled from many various tellings. They simply wrote them down. Yet we acknowledge them as the authors. Modern music mixes & sound collages eg FatBoy Slim’s version of ‘Praise You’…take loops and phrases from previous works and incorporate them into original mixes to make something new. In the world of Fine Art: Collage, Decoupage, Photomontage – all techniques of collecting existing images to create a new unified work – deemed the work of the compiling artist. Pop Art…the famous Campbell Soup can. Andy Warhol didn’t create it, all he did was put a frame around it and call it ‘art’. But it is definitely HIS art. Cheers, Craig PS: Look up the word 'playwright'. There's a reason it's not spelled 'play-write'. It's similar to the word 'shipwright'... A playwright is a maker, a creator, an adapter of material into plays. This can sometimes, but not necessarily always, include writing. ~<8>-/====\---------

Thread (14 posts)

← Back to Green Room Gossip