Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Apocalypse NOW

Wed, 22 Oct 2008, 09:37 am
crgwllms14 posts in thread
Back in July I jumped on a thread to defend a concept I thought was interesting. I'd heard about it through the director & writer in person, and assisted them to promote the as-yet-unwritten play at the Blue Room Season Launch. I then came online here to find out what it was really about, got involved in some already involved discussion, decided it really was a concept I'd be keen to see bear fruit, and put my hand up to participate. Along the way I've been fascinated and amazed by the number of people who felt entitled to post forth an opinion without feeling they needed to qualify it, and were happy to centre their argument on a stance of closed-mindedness. I've always considered theatre (actually, art in general) to thrive on the possibility of new ideas...hence my original indignation when I entered the debate. Now I don't pretend that I don't have strong views, and can exert a certain arrogance in arguing them, but I hope my history shows that I always side on the concept of open-mindedness and seeing more than two sides to any argument. (Of course there have been many others here also with open minds, who have put forth much valid and reasonable debate.) At the time of my original post, while defending the project, I made no claim to guess if the outcome would be good or bad, successful or not...simply that it was an idea that at least deserved a good go rather than being shot down. Now with the combined talents of a good dramaturg, a good director, a good cast, a good lighting designer, and a good musician, I'm prepared to pre-judge the result and announce that: it's going to be good! Whether it's successful is now partly up to you, at least in terms of attendance. I feel confident that artistically it tells an interesting story well, so by that measure it's already a success. But now it's your turn. We'd all be fascinated to discover what people think, whether we meet or exceed expectations, whether you think our blustering confidence was actually able to deliver or not, whether the style works for you, and whether we've managed to entertain. I'm sure no one's missed the coincidence that we've put ourselves right back where we started, in the position to have our show criticised and commented upon by all who see it...or who don't. I hope if nothing else it shows that theatre has many possibilities, ideas can be drawn from all kinds of interesting places, stories about human feelings can create great drama, and that creative people can achieve the unthinkable when they refuse to listen to what most people think. See you in the bar afterwards. Cheers Craig ~<8>-/======\--------

Here's another way of viewing it....

Thu, 23 Oct 2008, 10:45 am
....given many of the posters chose to do so anonymously I'm guessing that their lack of ownership for their work puts it in the public domain anyway for anyone to use and adapt as they see fit. My guess is that many of those posters would be unwilling (unwise?) to come forward and reveal who they truely were,in a fit of indignation that their words have been appropriated, if only because they showed they could not spell, form sentences, or espouse a cogent point of view. It would seem that the playwright has done everything in her power to acknowledge the contributions of the posters she has been able to identify and beyond that I would politely suggest she owes the anonynmous posters sweet bugger all. Ladies and gents, this is a public forum and it's my opinion that general chit-chat posted here is up for grabs by anyone if they so choose. Anyone care to put forward an alternative argument? I find it amusing that any anonymous poster could take umbrage for not having been acknowledged - you can't have it both ways y'know. Let's sum it up this way - it appears Kate has taken several nothings and made something from it - that's called creativity. Originally the posts themselves were a disconnected array of nothings which actually had the combined effect of stifling creativity. So, when you really think about it - the only creative thing that has come from the whole sorry saga is what Kate has woven together with the help of her cast. Hell, I would want to take credit for that if I was in her shoes. BTW Craig, I've changed my mind - I'm positively fascinated now to see what you folks have come up with. See you next week at the Blue Room :)

Thread (14 posts)

← Back to Green Room Gossip