Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

The Three Birds

Fri, 28 Sept 2012, 08:52 am
Gordon the Optom5 posts in thread

‘The Three Birds’ was the first play written by Joanna Laurens, an English playwright who is still in her early thirties. This contemporary, poetic play is a blend of ‘Philomela’ – the ancient Greek Ovid’s story - and ‘Tereus’, the play by Sophocles that went missing.

Laurens’ awards include one for Most Promising Playwright (2000) and the ‘Time Out’ award for Most Outstanding New Talent (2001).

This Curtin Performance Studies and Hayman Theatre Company presentation by the students is showing at The Hayman Theatre Upstairs, Curtin University, Bentley. These chilling, 105-minute performances are until Saturday 6th October. Curtain up at 7.30 pm. Tickets are at a sensible price.

 

          Like a wind passing through the theatre, a flock of birds gather on the stage. When threatened by humans, they group and quiver, re-finding their freedom when the threat has passed by.

         A rich, middle-aged businessman, Pandion (Choong Boon Siew) is talking to young handsome, regally linked, Tereus (Jack Middleton); he has an offer to make – his daughter. Tereus is thrilled as he has always loved Philomela (Georgina Cramond), but Pandion is actually offering his other beautiful daughter, Procne (Hannah Mason). Faced with the possibility of being shunned and cut out of any further negotiations for a spouse, Tereus reluctantly decides to accept the rich man’s offer. Even when Procne offers, ‘the bushy vale beneath the two Athenian Hills’ he is still less than enthusiastic.

        After some time they have a son, Itys (Gemma Middleton) who is a chip off the old man’s block, greedy and strong-minded. Tereus pines for his beloved Philomela who is forever outside his reach. To ensure that no one else will have her, with the help of his man servant (Dylan Searle) he viciously cuts out her tongue and incarcerates her in a secret venue, telling everyone that she has been eaten by wolves.

       Philomela creates a tapestry that is sent to her sister, Procne, who has the skill to read the threads and finds that she is still alive, Philomela is rescued and the sisters plot their revenge.
      The play finishes with the three main characters turning into three very different birds before flying off.

 

Leah Mercer has created a fast-paced, highly physical play, filled with action that employs the whole theatre. The design (Tessa Darcey, assisted by Jacinta Grando) is simple but visually most effective. The whole stage and the drapes, along with the costumes (Ellie Morrison) are all in virginal white. A great deal of the atmosphere relies upon the lighting design (Duncan Sharp – operated Angela Donlan).

The chorus comprised Rachel Foucar, Tanaya Harper, Amy Johnston, Rebecca Miller and Judy Young. The acting was a little inconsistent, but with particularly fine performances by Hannah Mason and Georgina Cramond, the overall effect was most satisfying.

The script was extremely clever, full of double-entendres, metaphors and symbolism. The audience took a little time to latch on to the style of humour, but still missed many of the jokes.

This adaptation of the Ovid story is wonderfully entertaining and in general well presented by the university students.

Read the play before watching

Thu, 4 Oct 2012, 03:05 am
Walter Plinge
I was so very glad that I was familiar with the story of the Three Birds before I went to see the show- if I wasn't, I would have had a very hard time following the story. For the most part I had great difficulty hearing the words- the diction of the main actors was appalling. The Three Birds is a very well written script that is funny, and yet serious; touching on important subjects such as rape, unrequited love and revenge. It was is a shame that such a beautiful script was butchered so harshly - many jokes were lost because the audience simply couldn't hear them. There were many moments when it appeared that the actors themselves didn't understand what was going on or what they were saying- which causes the audience even more confusion- how are we expected to follow a story when the people telling it do not know it? There were also many moments when it was clear that the actor onstage was acting for the sake of acting. There is nothing worse than watching a man strut about the stage as though he is the greatest actor to have ever walked upon a stage. We are there to see characters; not actors. We don't want to see if you can cry on cue; or how good your Shakespearean voice is- we want to be engaged in the story- we want the characters to seem real. The saving grace for this play is the chorus. They were engaging and clear. Each actor was in their role- not trying to steal the spot light or show how amazing their acting skills are; each knew what they had to do and was clear about doing it; and for the most part their dialogue was understandable. The design in The Three Birds is phenomenal- the set began so beautifully pristine and orderly ended in chaos and mess; the lighting and music set such a beautiful tone for some very poignant moments in the piece. This play was at its best when no one was talking. Overall; it was a disappointment. This play could have been amazing- but they settled for mediocre. I would advise the creators in future to focus more on the acting and less on what it looks like- the most beautiful set can't change the fact that audiences will leave the theatre asking what just happened.

Thread (5 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews