Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Someone Who'll Watch Over Me

Fri, 1 Oct 2010, 09:17 am
Gordon the Optom10 posts in thread

‘Someone who’ll watch over me’ by Irish dramatist Frank McGuiness is based on the true story of Brian Keenan - an East Belfast Protestant - who was captured by Lebanese Islamic extremists and held for almost 5 years in underground prisons. Lawson Productions at the Old Mill Theatre, Mends Street, South Perth are presenting this powerful drama until 2nd October. The two and a quarter hour performances start at 8.00 pm.

 

This Tony Award winning play showed on Broadway for around 300 performances, before winning the 1993 New York drama critics' circle award for best foreign play.

 

        It is April 1986 in Beirut and American doctor, Adam (David Gregory), after four months of captivity, is doing press-ups and trying to keep fit. His cellmate is a mentally strong Irishman, Edward (Kingsley Judd), whose idea of sport is recalling well-known soccer matches and racing events. They form a strong self-supporting bond, and then one day a new man appears in their prison. He is a straight-laced, pedantic English lecturer, Michael (Stephen Lee), who is erudite to the extreme. His scholarly conversations leave the other two bored and frustrated.

        Will this strange mix of men be able to survive their indefinite time together?

 

I remember 20 years ago the release of Keenan, and the similar tale around this time of a giant of a man, Terry Waite. Waite worked with the Archbishop of Canterbury as his international special envoy, and he regularly acted as a negotiator with terrorist groups for the release of prisoners, when out of the blue he found himself incarcerated for 5 years. I can still see his emaciated, pathetic, yet proud, figure emerging from the rescuers van. Because of this I have put off seeing this play, after all why at the end of a tiring day at work would one wish to be faced with such depression, misery and upset? If you have similar feelings put them aside. This is play is packed with humour, occasionally very dark, but most of the time just great fun. Seeing the positive attitude of the three men gives one a true uplift.

The teenage guards are never seen, but are they the real threat? Or is the true enemy within the men themselves? You often wonder throughout the play whether the men are actually mad, or is this flippancy their way of coping?

Because the text of the play was so lucid, I found myself drifting back to the hell that was exposed; the suffering of the families and the desperation of Government officials who had no idea where these prisoners were being held.

When there are millions of starving children, or people suffering, it is easy to turn a blind eye and move on, but when the story of a single individual is being considered, then the whole drama becomes more meaningful and personal. The strength of various individual’s human spirit and determination amazes me. The ability of the three men to endure each other was conveyed in a heartrending way.

The script was superbly constructed, the dialogue marvellous as it conveyed the depths of the prisoners’ feelings. To say that the acting was remarkable is an understatement, it leaves you gasping at the quality and Peter Clark’s direction was astonishing. Beautifully lit by Josh Veitch and managed by Glynis Best.

It is not often that I join the appeal for an audience, as often those asking have chosen a poor play, have cast poorly or simply done a diabolical job. This is NOT a community theatre play, but a professional production – in all the meanings of the word – where the team have invested their own money, hired the theatre and have come up with a superb production. Please support it, otherwise directors will continue to pick ‘safe’ plays and Perth’s theatre entertainment will be boringly bland, generating the same trite repetition.

Theatre at its very best.

The show you shoulda seen

Sat, 2 Oct 2010, 01:41 am
This was it. I'm not sure whether this show reinforced my faith in why people do theatre or depressed the hell out of me as regards what we're supposed to pander to. On one hand you had this extraordinary production bursting with great performances from three actors thoroughly at ease with the demands of their roles, totally trusting each others instincts, nurtured by a director who had an obvious love of the material, and supported by a tech crew who provided the ambience or harshness of the environment as the needs dictated plus the soundscape to support the narrative. On the other hand 66 seats full meant too many seats empty. Had it been a safe english farce I dare to venture the house may have been full and that depresses me. Not because english farces or musicals for that matter aren't there to be enjoyed or valid - of course they are - but this show was a diamond and many of those other shows are simply adequate. I can't believe ANYONE who attended this show would leave feeling unfulfilled. I can't believe anyone witnessing this show wouldn't thank the cast and crew for the opportunity to have attended it. I can't believe we aren't - as a theatre community (both performers and attendees) - demanding more productions such as this. It seems grossly unjust that seats went unfilled. As a fulltime idiot and part-time amateur actor I can't imagine WANTING to be bothered doing yet another farce when there is material like this to really CHALLENGE both the performer and the audience. Perhaps thats the answer? Perhaps those of us willing to give up our personal time should REFUSE to perpetuate the banality and repetitive nature of some of those productions by auditioning or answering that desperate call where there is a struggle to get a cast together? Perhaps we should demand the chance to at least try and bring something new and exciting and important to the stage? Perhaps only then will we change the palate of our audiences and get them to accept something that's not the general fare? Perhaps then 66 seats filled will be a poor night. Moot point really. I understand the need to put on fare that will get an audience from an economic standpoint. No argument there....as long as we accept we're playing 'safe' and putting on 'safe' and often imitative theatre (think any production of a famous english TV series). If we're happy with that, don't change but don't complain when you struggle to find a cast interested in doing such stuff. Peter Clark has put on three shows in the last couple of years I've seen - The Birthday Party at the late lamented Rechabites, Sugar Daddy (that was the name wasn't it) at Marloo, and now this production at Old Mill. All three were excellent, quality productions and all three deserved the attention of anyone serious about attending theatre. Peter puts up his own money for these shows (as I'm sure others do) not because his ego so desperately needs feeding but because he desires to provide fare that challenges but also entertains an audience and hopefully gives them an insight into the quality that theatre can provide. How long will he continue to do so when audiences stay away in droves? I've railed against the perception that Perth is a city of cultural philistines and that if you want artisitic creativity embraced you have to travel to the eastern states. I'm now coming to the conclusion that sadly this may be true. Empty seats fuel that thinking. Had my rant - feel better now. Well done to all in Someone Who'll Watch Over Me. Very glad I made the effort to get there and hope your last night is a wee ripper.

Thread (10 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews