GRADS - With Friends Like These...
Tue, 29 June 2010, 02:55 pmJonno20 posts in thread
GRADS - With Friends Like These...
Tue, 29 June 2010, 02:55 pmI've just read a copy of Ron Banks' shocking assassination of this production.
First I should 'fess up that I have been involved as set builder, and that I am a friend of several castmembers.
How a so called professional reviewer can deliver such a withering attack whilst admitting to only seeing the first half, is highly suspect. Does he have some personal negative history with Edgar?
I watched both the opening night and the second performance. I was in fact seated close behind the couple who left early, and had heard several appreciative laughs from them. Maybe they got a text re. a babysitter crisis; who knows?
Mr Banks leaves us in no doubt as to his feelings regarding a character in a comedy afflicted with a stutter. The other 80-odd audience members on both nights didn't seem to share his offended sensibilities. They stayed right to the end, laughed loudly and frequently, and applauded enthusiastically. Perhaps Banks has a close relative suffering this affliction: that would be the only logical explanation for his degree of vehemence.
A fair reviewer, even if mentioning offence at that particular element, might also have mentioned the delightful performances from many of the cast - I would personally single out Kerri Hilton and Beth Legg.
Don't be put off by the singularly one-eyed review. As a long term GRADS member, I am pleased to see the group presenting a new, local and thoroughly amusing light comedy. No doubt the penetration of "The West Australian" and Ron Banks' abuse of his media power will affect the success of the production disastrously, which is a real pity when so many of us have worked long and hard to mount a show which is far more worthy than he implies.
A fair point...
Tue, 29 June 2010, 08:17 pm... is made by The Beckett; surely there is something of a dereliction of duty, or at very least professional ethics, by being paid (I assume Banks was paid) to review a show, and not "suffering" the whole work. Who knows, maybe the second half would have explained the first? It is at the very least poor form on Banks' part.
It is even WORSE form on the West's part to publish this "non-review" as a review. Were they that short of content today that any meagre column inches, no matter how bleak, would have sufficed? This is something I would encourage be best taken up with Mr Stephen Bevis in his capacity as the West's Arts Editor.
I am given to understand that the reason this community theatre show was reviewed was simply because of the involvement of the august personage of Mr Metcalfe. In fact there was a valedictorian-style piece about him last week in The West detailing this very production. If memory serves (and it could very well serve a double-fault here) I thought that piece was also penned by Mr Banks... can anyone confirm this?
However, the fact remains that the show has received another patented "Banks Bashing", but I honestly don't believe he holds the sway he once did. People will come see Mr Metcalfe's show to say goodbye, and they'll make up their own mind.
Eliot McCann- who wouldn't mind a gig reviewing for The West, if anyone's interested....