Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Godot - worth waiting for!

Tue, 1 June 2010, 03:33 pm
julia dalby6 posts in thread
If you’re lucky (geddit??) at least once in your life you will experience a production that is so good, so beautiful, so utterly pitch perfect that you daren't breathe too loudly for fear of missing a millisecond. In 2006 I was blessed by the Great Spaghetti Monster and caught an Irish production of Waiting for Godot at the *shudder* Barbican Centre in London (The Barbican: where absolutely everything is a baffling ordeal.). To date, it remains the most faultless, sublime and exquisite piece of any performance, in any genre, I have ever seen. Ever. If you can hunt down a copy, grab the film version of Godot done in 2001. This was the same stunning cast we saw in 2006. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0276613/ Fast forward to Saturday night, and the current production on at the Maj. It was a marvellous show. Just wonderful. A romp! If I get hit by a bus tomorrow it’s cool because I will die having experienced Sir Ian on stage, in all his magnificence. In some ways, it’s unfair to put Sir Ian up there with mere mortals. As good as the rest of the cast was (and they were brilliant) there is just no comparison. As one friend put it, it was like watching a show featuring three fantastic actors, and one shuffling bum called Estragon. Apart from performances, there were other differences in the treatment of the play. This production was much lighter than the Irish one, yet both were screamingly funny. This one had an impressive set, whilst the Irish one had a tree and a rock and that was about it. This is a wonderfully accessible and very easily understood (as well as any absurdist piece can be) production. There is very little darkness and no sense of impending doom. Was this Beckett for the Masses? quaquaquaqua. Had it been done in such a way to appeal to the punters who were coming just to see Gandalf on stage? quaquaquaqua. I think it’s great that folk who would never ordinarily set foot in a theatre, will come and see this for McKellan. Maybe they’ll go see something else now they’ve lost their collective theeyata cherries. Quaquaquaqua!! I have made reference to the first cast being Irish, and I have done so for a reason. Was the Irish production so much better because only Irish actors/directors “get” Beckett? The Irish cast nailed it as far as subtext and nuance is concerned. Imagine, if you will, an American company trying to do justice to Don’s Party or The Boys. They could give it a Big Aussie Go, and may well do a superb job, but they will never get the quintessential “Australianess” of the plays. The thing missing from this production was the delightful Irish “gallows humour.”, the bleak sensibilities that are an unholy yet stunning combination of the turgid, the absurd and the hilarious. McKellan came the closest and I wonder if it was because he played Gogo as a Northerner with a thick Lancashire accent? Quaquaquaqua….. “….for reasons unknown..” JMD

WAITING FOR GODOT

Thu, 3 June 2010, 12:51 pm
Hooray for Julia Dalby – what a relief to find that there are others in this town who respond so positively to WFG. As a would-be director with a wonderful local cast in mind in search of a local company to support a season of WFG, I had begun to despair. Reactions I have had include 'We don't like doing two-handers' (true!); 'A bit too intellectual for us, mate'; 'I hate that play!' (I have never read it or seen it, so it can't be any good?)'; 'I couldn't recommend it to my committee, I'm afraid, dear boy'; 'existential claptrap – no-one would come'; 'We prefer contemporary scripts by local writers'. But there have been one or two cautious nibbles which I have put on hold until after I had seen Sir and company's effort this week. Having had that pleasure, I am convinced that a local production could only benefit from the reputation of Sir's Show. Like Julia, I have a reservation or two about this production but it will remain in my mind as one of the theatrical tours-de-force of my ever-longer life, into which I have managed to squeeze Lucky and Didi in two different productions – and it wasn't all down to Sir. The highly theatrical setting, such a departure from the original direction, the solid grasp of Beckett's music-hall references and the clearly defined characterisations, while giving me a lesson in theatrical humility, kept me smiling all night, broken only by the occasional belly-laugh. The few (kerr-ritticks!) who left at halftime – and there are always some who think it's finished and others who refuse to understand it – had drunk only half this particular glass – there was another half to come and then runneth over with the most delightfully theatrical of curtain calls which, alone, was worth at least 25% of the ticket price. Speaking of which, I was glad I had had the strength of character to forgo my usual truffle sandwiches in order to save the $89 for the cheapest (but good-enough) seat – but $20 for a program was going just that little bit too far so, apart from Sir, I can't give names to all the cast, all of who were, of course, splendid. Oh, and by the way, if there is anyone out there who can offer help in getting a local WFG on the boards, give me a call … please? 9398 9958. CHIZZ PHIL MACKENZIE FLIPMAC

Thread (6 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews