Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Pool (no water)

Sat, 12 Sept 2009, 09:46 am
Gordon the Optom13 posts in thread

‘Pool (no water)’ written by British playwright Mark Ravenhill in 2006, was inspired by the true story of a Booker Prize winning writer (A. S. Byatt). It is presented by the Black Swan State Theatre Company and features their HotBed Ensemble. It is being performed at the PICA Performance Space, James Street, Northbridge until the 27th September. Showing nightly at 8.00 pm, with three matinees.

Due to the nature of this play, NO entry for LATECOMERS.

         Internationally famous artist and financially extremely successful Sally, invites her fellow Bohemians around for an overdue get-together, and to wallow in her new swimming pool. As they dance the night away, they recall how as young art students they would regularly go skinny-dipping, the wild parties and their close friendships. They then talk with admiration of the wonderful generosity of their hostess, her visits to sick children’s wards, hospices and homes of the poor. Now, however, her old friends are battlers, scraping a living together from the odd sale of a painting, are exceedingly envious.

        During the festivities, a horrendous accident happens to the hostess, forcing the substance-abusing friends to hatch an audacious plan. Could their comatose ‘friend’ unwittingly become exploited and thus their next successful artwork?

        What will happen as their now famous ‘gang’ member fades from the earth? What will their attitude to their old friend be like? Will they love or hate her?

Director, Adam Mitchell, employs rapid dialogue with each performer giving a hard-hitting couple of sentences, combined with a Breton style Surrealism (?) delivery, in which the four actors change characters continuously throughout the play. With every cast member playing the comatose patient at some stage. The cast were Arielle Gray, Natalie Holmwood, Jacinta John, Kazimir Sas and Will O'Mahony all selected by HotBed for their special acting talents, which they used to the full.

Alicia Clements’s set consisted mainly of a central unit, about the size of a large snooker table with a surface of changing lights, which was employed as the swimming pool – a very impressive opening scene of the artist swimming – and then as the hospital bed.

Trent Suidgeest’s lighting design consisted mainly of powerful spots at shoulder height, which gave the faces a crisp aura against the stark black background. When the drama hit the various climaxes the lighting would turn to a stark icy cold white. Very well thought out design.

Ben Collins’ sound had some snappy, well synchronised sound effects blended with most effective, creepy low level music which played throughout.

The acting was powerful, the cast’s drive and energy amazing as they tackled this unusual style of acting presentation. Despite the intelligent and admirable quality, this is a love it or hate it play.

Thread (13 posts)

Gordon the OptomSat, 12 Sept 2009, 09:46 am

‘Pool (no water)’ written by British playwright Mark Ravenhill in 2006, was inspired by the true story of a Booker Prize winning writer (A. S. Byatt). It is presented by the Black Swan State Theatre Company and features their HotBed Ensemble. It is being performed at the PICA Performance Space, James Street, Northbridge until the 27th September. Showing nightly at 8.00 pm, with three matinees.

Due to the nature of this play, NO entry for LATECOMERS.

         Internationally famous artist and financially extremely successful Sally, invites her fellow Bohemians around for an overdue get-together, and to wallow in her new swimming pool. As they dance the night away, they recall how as young art students they would regularly go skinny-dipping, the wild parties and their close friendships. They then talk with admiration of the wonderful generosity of their hostess, her visits to sick children’s wards, hospices and homes of the poor. Now, however, her old friends are battlers, scraping a living together from the odd sale of a painting, are exceedingly envious.

        During the festivities, a horrendous accident happens to the hostess, forcing the substance-abusing friends to hatch an audacious plan. Could their comatose ‘friend’ unwittingly become exploited and thus their next successful artwork?

        What will happen as their now famous ‘gang’ member fades from the earth? What will their attitude to their old friend be like? Will they love or hate her?

Director, Adam Mitchell, employs rapid dialogue with each performer giving a hard-hitting couple of sentences, combined with a Breton style Surrealism (?) delivery, in which the four actors change characters continuously throughout the play. With every cast member playing the comatose patient at some stage. The cast were Arielle Gray, Natalie Holmwood, Jacinta John, Kazimir Sas and Will O'Mahony all selected by HotBed for their special acting talents, which they used to the full.

Alicia Clements’s set consisted mainly of a central unit, about the size of a large snooker table with a surface of changing lights, which was employed as the swimming pool – a very impressive opening scene of the artist swimming – and then as the hospital bed.

Trent Suidgeest’s lighting design consisted mainly of powerful spots at shoulder height, which gave the faces a crisp aura against the stark black background. When the drama hit the various climaxes the lighting would turn to a stark icy cold white. Very well thought out design.

Ben Collins’ sound had some snappy, well synchronised sound effects blended with most effective, creepy low level music which played throughout.

The acting was powerful, the cast’s drive and energy amazing as they tackled this unusual style of acting presentation. Despite the intelligent and admirable quality, this is a love it or hate it play.

Walter PlingeSat, 12 Sept 2009, 10:11 pm

what is a breton style?

what is a breton style?
Gordon the OptomSat, 12 Sept 2009, 10:39 pm

breton style

In 1924, André Breton, revived the term in his Manifesto of Surrealism, where he describes a "super-reality" connecting the dream world and reality.

However my interpretation of this manifesto is open to correction.

Gordon

Walter PlingeSat, 12 Sept 2009, 11:04 pm

i was looking for a

i was looking for a description that was not copied from wikipedia
grantwatsonSun, 13 Sept 2009, 11:41 am

And some of us are

And some of us are constantly looking for online discussions with people who don't use pseudonyms, but what can you do?
jmuzzSun, 13 Sept 2009, 06:29 pm

You gotta love this Plop

Asks for a definition. Gets a definition handed to him. Complains about the source which indicates he looked up the very thing he asked for a definition of. Jeez, the trolls aren't even trying these days......
crgwllmsSun, 13 Sept 2009, 07:02 pm

Praise (no counter)

>> Despite the intelligent and admirable quality, this is a love it or hate it play. WHY, Gordon? You've only told half the story. All very well to mention those things you liked, but you don't justify your final sentence. Why might it be a 'hate it' play? The script, the style, the seating, the soundtrack, the smell..? Maybe there WERE no such bad points. I haven't seen it yet. But how, then, can you finish with such a sentence? Your praise would carry more credence if you would also voice your concerns. Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------
Gordon the OptomMon, 14 Sept 2009, 07:48 am

putting on the style

I am one of these people that like to have a label for things, the style of acting in this show was something I have not seen before, and possibly don’t want to see again. Still it was new experience, and I always admire people that try something new, whether it succeeds or fails, at least they tried.
The delivery for the whole hour of the play was in punchy two-line sentences thrown from one actor to another, who were in turn changing characters.
There is no doubt that Adam and his team did a brilliant job – absolutely no complaint with them whatsoever, the teching was superb, so basically I think it boils down to the script and the style of delivery, which was tiring after about 20 minutes.
I know some will think the concept brilliant, hence the ‘love or hate’ quote.
LabrugMon, 14 Sept 2009, 04:34 pm

Google

Why not google his name. Amazing how many sites talk about him and his techniques.

Absit invidia (and DFT :nono:)

Jeff Watkins
SN Profile
"ƃuıʇsǝɹǝʇuı ǝɟıן ƃuıʞɐɯ"

Walter PlingeMon, 14 Sept 2009, 09:52 pm

pool

I agree with a lot of what Gordon has said. I love this site and visit it nearly every day, but rarely comment. I was at the preview on Friday. It was a piece that worked on the individual levels, sound, lights, set, movment and I thought the Actors performed well. But I still left the building feeling as though it didn't work as a whole. The sound design by Ben Collins fitted well, maybe when the Actors are talking upstage the sound could have been lowered a touch more, but that could be my dodgy old ears. I did like the Movment Direction by Claudia Alessi, very good. The lighting and Set design were also well done. There were a couple of moments that I had trouble picking up some (not too many) lines from Jacinta John, but again it could be my problem. After is was over, I remembered a quote from an old friend who went to see a WAPA show a few years ago.... "They were technicaly perfect, but had no Heart" and this is what is sticking with me about this production, it seemed to lack a heart. I will put this down to the writing, no... the fashion. This stream of concious type writing is becoming more popular/trendy and I think the line between Performance Art and Theatre is starting to meld. I don't mean the hanging from hooks while reciting poetry about the evils of human kind, but the "I want to say this and you will listen to me" type stuff. Where as I believe Theatre should be trying to connect and engage with an Audience and shouldn't be like an Art Gallery where people just look at what someone else has done. And this is most probably my final feeling about "Pool" I watched what they did, but never engaged with it. Regards Bruce
Walter PlingeSun, 20 Sept 2009, 09:36 pm

But anyway....back to

But anyway....back to actual comments about Pool (no water). I thought it was a great Saturday afternoon's entertainment. Didn't have to think to hard. Enough pretty people to look at. The pace kept me awake. Great lighting. I just wanted to be on stage with them- the actors looked like they were having a great time. Well done to Adam Mitchell, crew and cast.
Walter PlingeTue, 22 Sept 2009, 02:34 pm

Agree with Comrade Bruce

I totally agree with Comrade Bruce... It was pretty to look at but I couldn't help feeling that the actors were, dare I say it... "acting". I could see their eyes flicker when they were thinking what line was going to come next and where they need to be standing when they deliver that line. So off putting. Just don't think this was the "style" Adam Mitchell was going for as two of the actors (forget their names) appeared more believable than the others and were able to connect with the audience (with me and my companion anyway). So yes I guess it is a love or hate it play and i hated it!
crgwllmsThu, 24 Sept 2009, 01:12 am

Be brave

Gordon said >> "I always admire people that try something new, whether it succeeds or fails, at least they tried." Yes, I quite agree with that sentiment. A play doesn't have to be perfect, to be entertaining. And quite often elements might not actually work at all, but one can still be impressed by what they were trying to achieve, if it's a good concept. On the other hand, it doesn't matter much if a poor concept is executed perfectly...it'll still be a poor concept! So let that thought encourage further experimentation. Directors, please don't hold back on good ideas, trying to make your play 'perfect'. It probably won't be, and you might also be making it boring! Far better to be brave and interesting! Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------
← Back to Theatre Reviews