Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Hamlet

Wed, 26 Aug 2009, 08:20 am
Gordon the Optom20 posts in thread

‘The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark’ a powerful tragedy by William Shakespeare, is presented by the Bare Naked and Class Act Theatre companies. Performed on the main stage at the Subiaco Arts Centre, Wed 26th Aug 8pm, Thu 27th Aug 10 a.m. & Fri 28th Aug 10 a.m. Further performances in Mandurah on the 18th September.

           It is the year 2000 (four hundred year ahead of the play’s true date of 1600) in the royal castle at Elsinore in Denmark. Prince Hamlet (Craig Williams) strumming an electric fuzz guitar tells us in song of the death of his father.

         Hamlet’s best friend, Horatio (Rhoda Lopez) arrives and tells Hamlet of sightings of the old King’s ghost by the sentries. On hearing this, Hamlet tries to see the ghost for himself. When the spectre appears (on video, like the start of the old ‘Dr Who’ series) the King’s spirit tell how Claudius had poisoned him and requests that Hamlet seeks revenge. After some hesitation, Hamlet decides to take vengeance on his uncle Claudius (Dan Luxton) who has gained the throne by a dubious election and, almost incestuously, married the widowed Queen Gertrude (Angelique Malcolm), Hamlet's mother.

        Laertes (Ben Russell), the father of Hamlet’s girlfriend Ophelia (Whitney Richards), returns from the wars and is told by Polonius (Stephen Lee) that he suspects Hamlet does not have sincere feelings for Ophelia. Then to make things worse Polonius tells Queen Gertrude that he suspects Hamlet is unbalanced. Initially Prince Hamlet feigns madness, and as an alibi, simulates grief.

        Then the trouble really begins – who will gain the other’s love. Who will die in the process?

Director Stephen Lee has an exceptional knowledge of Shakespeare’s writings, and even in this contemporary version, he manages to pass on a full understanding of the script to the audience, which last night was comprised mainly of school students. He also made accessible the hidden agendas of the play. Written at a time of religious upheaval, there is a Catholic versus Protestant theme. Also, satirical playwrights were punished for politically ‘offensive’ works, so Shakespeare had to hide any digs at the establishment. Here Lee has given some of the characters an American ‘deep south’ accent to hint at the strife between Norway and Denmark, I felt the success of this idea was variable.

The play’s light relief, the Rosencrantz and Guildenstern scene, is delivered in this production with great success as a hammed-up video scene from the old TV series ‘Dallas’.

Hamlet is the most skilled of all Shakespeare’s plays at rhetoric and, backed with a VERY strong cast, Craig Williams captured the tricky portrayal of the many sensitive meanings with clarity.

The scene where Hamlet fought with and abused Ophelia, the director hinted at the Prince’s possible (but controversial) Oedipus complex. Ophelia’s collapse into madness is superbly depicted with full emotions by Whitney Richards, in her first major production. In a play that is flowing with moral corruption, and which considers most women to be mere whores, the director has chosen a woman to play Horatio – with great success.

Hamlet is Shakespeare's longest play and most popular work, and it still ranks high among his most performed. Here we have a novel approach that was most successful, and with convincing, vicious fight scenes the play was loved by the young audience, who possibly came to truly understand the story for the first time. Most enjoyable, a difficult play handled with great talent.

The readiness is all.

Mon, 31 Aug 2009, 05:35 pm
Is Hamlet gay? Many of the interpretations prior to the twentieth century did paint Hamlet as rather flowery, arty, and effeminate. Modern interpretations tend to push the rebellious, angry, sullen and brooding. This is another reason why the 'rock star' image worked so well, because it allowed the tough rebel fighter image to marry seamlessly with the image of a poet who has a sense of the theatrical. Hamlet is an artist (or at least a wannabe) and is therefore, in a sense, ageless. While it makes mathematical logic to expand the life expectancy timeline of the past to fit today's, it doesn't follow biologically. You can't just stretch the timeline and expect all the points to move proportionately. Otherwise you'd expect children would have gotten their teeth, & been able to talk, about three years earlier than they do today; sexual maturity would have happened at about 8, etc...! (Just like the myth of human years being equivalent to 7 dog years...it works for the first few years of a puppy's life: in 3 human years a dog can be born, pass through 'childhood', 'pubescence' and enter 'adulthood', but thereafter the 7 year thing doesn't work. Otherwise there are a hell of a lot of what would be considered 80 year olds, in dog terms, still running around and rooting as if they were in their 'twenties'..!) So no, I think the compromise is to accept that Hamlet is pretty close to 30, but in most other aspects of his behaviour acts more in his early twenties. However, that's why I listed the ages of the actors who have played some definitive Hamlets. They were almost all late 30's to 40's, which is possibly the intellectual age of Hamlet, and the typical age an actor might need to be to have the experience to tackle it sensibly. Being older, and (particularly in the era of short life spans) closer to death would justify some of Hamlet's stoic attitude to death and fate and whether he is ready to face his end. All in all, he's just a character in a play with a function to perform, and so he can be allowed some artistic license in the consistency of his actual physical existence! Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------

Thread (20 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews