Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

FAME - Limelight Theatre

Sun, 7 Dec 2008, 01:07 pm
Thomas Stanley8 posts in thread
I went along to the production Saturday 6th December. And I was very impressed! Having only seen the show on the Westend about 6 years ago, I had forgotten how much I enjoyed the songs (and not just the title song). From the very beginning of the show it was evident that the cast were confident and full of energy with them entering onto stage with vibrance and a well rehearsed opening of "Pray I make P.A" The set was well designed and used effectively. The lighting was good however I found the Spotlight very distacting. Whenever someone was lit on the second level of the Set, the hanging lights on the rig cast shadows on the set. Possibly moving the Spot to the staircase up to the Lighting desk or tightening the area of light around the performer would have rectified the problem. The sound in the venue was fantastic, with a great blend between voices and the orchestra, who were superb - Congratulations to the MD and musicians. Outstanding performances were given by the actors playing Mabel, Schlomo and Jose. Their focus was consistant and their performances (both singing and acting) were strong. Mabels prayer was a highlight for me. Such a big voice from a small performer! Jack/Tyrone - Although a strong dancer that was able to hold down the accent well, I felt he failed as a believable "straight" character. Once he danced he slipped out of character and became very camp, which then made the kissing scenes with the female performer look awkard. The angry/upset emotion also came out like a pout. Serena - Fantastic acting, and I enjoyed "Lets play a love scene" but she appeared to be a little less comfortable with the song "Think of Meryl Streep". Carmen - Great voice, good dancer. She tackled "Fame" with ease with a fiery latino feel, However with "In LA". The emotion was there however there seemed to be a struggle with the high notes. Nick - Made into a loveable character, but there was nothing believable about the romance between him and Serena. At first I thought perhaps direction was given to him to play the role as "Gay" and he and Serena were going to play the "Best Friends" roles, but at the end it was clear that their relationship was suppose to be of a sexual nature, which I couldn't grasp. I felt the weakest link of this production were the adult performers. I didn't feel that their performances were strong enough to match the young cast. Ms Bell was fairly natural in her acting (which I beleived) However her singing was just not strong enough. The Singing of Miss Sherman too was very weak. "These are my Children" lacked sincerity and quality. Mr Myers lacked stage presence and Mr Shienkopf kept dropping his Non-specific european accent. The dancing was simple yet effective and cleverly choreographed to show off its best dancers. Although I would have liked to have seen more dancing, I know how hard it is to get Singing/Dancing Actors who are "All-rounders". A great way to spend a Saturday afternoon (and the theatre was full - which was great to see). Chookas to the cast for your final week of performances.

Thread (8 posts)

Thomas StanleySun, 7 Dec 2008, 01:07 pm
I went along to the production Saturday 6th December. And I was very impressed! Having only seen the show on the Westend about 6 years ago, I had forgotten how much I enjoyed the songs (and not just the title song). From the very beginning of the show it was evident that the cast were confident and full of energy with them entering onto stage with vibrance and a well rehearsed opening of "Pray I make P.A" The set was well designed and used effectively. The lighting was good however I found the Spotlight very distacting. Whenever someone was lit on the second level of the Set, the hanging lights on the rig cast shadows on the set. Possibly moving the Spot to the staircase up to the Lighting desk or tightening the area of light around the performer would have rectified the problem. The sound in the venue was fantastic, with a great blend between voices and the orchestra, who were superb - Congratulations to the MD and musicians. Outstanding performances were given by the actors playing Mabel, Schlomo and Jose. Their focus was consistant and their performances (both singing and acting) were strong. Mabels prayer was a highlight for me. Such a big voice from a small performer! Jack/Tyrone - Although a strong dancer that was able to hold down the accent well, I felt he failed as a believable "straight" character. Once he danced he slipped out of character and became very camp, which then made the kissing scenes with the female performer look awkard. The angry/upset emotion also came out like a pout. Serena - Fantastic acting, and I enjoyed "Lets play a love scene" but she appeared to be a little less comfortable with the song "Think of Meryl Streep". Carmen - Great voice, good dancer. She tackled "Fame" with ease with a fiery latino feel, However with "In LA". The emotion was there however there seemed to be a struggle with the high notes. Nick - Made into a loveable character, but there was nothing believable about the romance between him and Serena. At first I thought perhaps direction was given to him to play the role as "Gay" and he and Serena were going to play the "Best Friends" roles, but at the end it was clear that their relationship was suppose to be of a sexual nature, which I couldn't grasp. I felt the weakest link of this production were the adult performers. I didn't feel that their performances were strong enough to match the young cast. Ms Bell was fairly natural in her acting (which I beleived) However her singing was just not strong enough. The Singing of Miss Sherman too was very weak. "These are my Children" lacked sincerity and quality. Mr Myers lacked stage presence and Mr Shienkopf kept dropping his Non-specific european accent. The dancing was simple yet effective and cleverly choreographed to show off its best dancers. Although I would have liked to have seen more dancing, I know how hard it is to get Singing/Dancing Actors who are "All-rounders". A great way to spend a Saturday afternoon (and the theatre was full - which was great to see). Chookas to the cast for your final week of performances.
Walter PlingeSun, 7 Dec 2008, 08:00 pm

Feedback

I was finally able to see the show on Saturday 6th December. After hearing mixed opinions on the previous shows, I too found myself with very mixed feelings regarding the performance :- Setting - Although fairly simple, I found this to be very effective which worked well. However, there were occassions where the changes were too slow. Lighting - As mentioned in the previous comment, there was a shadow effect at times which most certainly could be looked into. Singing - Great vocals from the younger members of the cast. The girl playing Mabel was outstanding. I felt she was in a higher league of her own, and when watching, made you forget for a moment that this is amateur theatre. Great stuff. Definately one to watch! Dancing - Very basic. The final number could have been made a lot better. I was expecting to see at least one box jump from Jack as I noticed he appeared to be very flamboyant and flexible. This is FAME after all. Acting - The acting was split down the middle. Some were very good, and some far from good. Actors who stood out for me were Jose who I found very amusing and portrayed his character well, Schlomo who has a very theatrical image which enabled him to perform his part with ease, and Serena who had good stage presence. I was not so keen on Jack, or Ms Bell. Ms Bell needed to show a lot more emotion for Jack, and unfortunately kept her volume at one level regardless of her characters feeling for each scene, even in song. As for Jack, I felt he was in over his head from the start having to play such a big role. Again, I know it is only amateur theatre therefore changes have to be made sometimes, and expectations lowered. But going from a very technical dancer with a distinctive attitude (tyrone), to a very camp, pouting dancer was just ridiculous. The orientation of the actor playing the part does not matter, however, the actor filling those shoes has to make the part manly and sharp otherwise it really does not work. Jack's short "I have rhythm" dance solo was dreadful. He had the energy, just not the dancing skills, technique, and facial expressions to back it up. Nick I am undecided about. I felt his part was easy to warmth to, but do not feel he gave his best. Perhaps Saturday was not the best show to watch him? I feel after watching him that he has the ability to be a lot better, and needs to work on his feelings for Serena. Still, he could be the dark horse who could steal the show if he improves. Well done to the chorus, who tend to get forgotten about when reviews are left. The blonde girl playing the nerdy student was most entertaining. Energy - Could not be faulted. The cast played off one another well, and gave off a great vibe. Overall, a good show for all ages. There is at least one character for everyone who they will walk away raving about.
Walter PlingeThu, 11 Dec 2008, 03:20 pm

Fame

Although I agreed with a great deal of what has been posted previously - the energy, the ensemble work and, of course, "Mabel" played by Tina Jackson, and the nerdy blonde, however, I feel the previous 2 writers were rather harsh with "Jack" played by Lauchlin Bain. I found this young man most entertaining and particularly enjoyed his dancing (with the possible exception of his rap-type solo - didn't seem to have any focus at all) "Dancing on the Sidewalk" showed not only his dancing ability, but some fine vocal qualities. He is still young and a more 'manly' presentation will come with maturity I'm sure. The 'adult' male characters were really just cameo roles, but the accent of the music teacher did tend to roam Europe a little too much. The ladies were a complete contrast to each other as the characters required, however, Miss Bell lacked any passion in her performance. Although the quality of her singing was not great, I cannot agree with the previous writer about the lack of sincerity of Miss Sherman. Her ability to sell the song more than made up for any lack of singing prowess and she hushed the audience for just a few minutes as they contemplating her plight. It is all too easy to look for the faults in productions and comment exclusively on them, but start looking for all the good things and you'll realise you were well entertained at the Limelight Theatre.
Walter PlingeThu, 11 Dec 2008, 05:04 pm

I think the 1st 2 reviews were fair....

Shelagh - I thought that the previous 2 reviews were pretty honest and didn't just "look at the faults". I thought they gave plenty of praise as well. I went along Wednesday 3rd and thoroughly enjoyed the shows energy, and agree with the first 2 reviews on the faults of the show. Unfortunately your comment in regards to the guy that played Jack, that 'manly presentation would come with maturity' is something I disagree with, As performers we have the choice of how much we want to give an audience of our own selves. Some people can be camp off stage and pull together a believable straight role onstage, and some people can't. Its not necessarily something that they will grow out of. The role of Jack I thought was danced and sung well, and he had a great grasp of the american accent, but his face turned to podium dancer in a gay club as soon as he danced. Its a tough one. But I find it hard to see an openly camp guy playing roles that requires them to be straight! It changes the chemistry from sexual to "friends". and I feel it can pull down the performance of the female that has to play opposite them. It by no means ruined the performance, but I believe it to be up to the director/choreographer to pick these things up and to address them. Maybe they tried, I dont know? To the cast and crew, You did a great job. Chookas for your last week of shows.
Walter PlingeFri, 12 Dec 2008, 12:00 am

Fame!!!

I am wondering why people write anything negative when it comes to community theatre reviews. Is it for the benefit of the actor concerned, as i am sure most people are aware if they hit a few wrong notes or arent the strongest dancer/singer etc, or is it for the benefit of future audience so they can look out for the same when they attend or maybe it is for the director, who i am sure is well aware of any minor short comings of someone in the cast who they have been directing for the past 3 months. I always wonder whether the person writing the negative comment maybe auditioned for the part and didnt get it, or just thinks they can do better. At the end of the day people are up on stage because they want to have some fun, having some (anonymous) person tell them they didnt hit a note or dropped their accent for one line doesnt really add anything to their experience. i saw Fame and i thought the dancing (and singing) of LB was one of the highlights of the show. all the best for the rest!!! Cornelius
Bass GuyFri, 12 Dec 2008, 09:27 am

Infamy!!

Cornelius countered with concern: "I am wondering why people write anything negative when it comes to community theatre reviews." Well, wonder no longer!! Some reviewers may actually take the business of reviewing seriously, and offer a factual report of the performance they saw, wart and all. Some reviewers, on the other hand, may just be spiteful for their own amusement. And some reviewers still may not recognise the distinction between critical reviews and free publicity, and write NOTHING BUT nice things. I, for one, try to write in the first category- if a show was crappy, I'll tell you it was crappy- but also I'll tell you why, and what might be done to make it better. I feel that way of writing is far more useful than having someone say "You've all done very well, and I loved the costumes". Or "U guys sux- the director is sux too, lol, roflmao...." etc etc etc. El "Proud and insolent youth; prepare to meet thy doom!"
Walter PlingeFri, 12 Dec 2008, 10:12 am

Maybe I have the wrong

Maybe I have the wrong impression of Community Theatre? I always thought that the performers should be striving for professional theatre standards. Or should I be attending Community Theatre with low expectations? Some performers may have thoughts of choosing theatre as a career, and some are doing it just for fun. But either way, as a performer you have a responsibility to a paying audience(no matter how much they pay) to give them a GREAT show, otherwise you should keep your performance for the safety of your lounge room. And yes we have a right as a paying audience to make comments on someones performance, in hopes that they can see what is constructive critism and grow from it.
Walter PlingeSat, 13 Dec 2008, 12:20 pm

On the contrary, I think

On the contrary, I think Lauchlin Bain did a fantastic job and I would never just say that to stick up for someone. I came on this site to rave about him and could not believe what I was reading and I have to wonder if we saw the same show?!! I don't know whether it was because I was sitting at the front and I could see his face very clearly but the passion, emotion and commitment on his face really distinguished him and made his performance professional. I saw intent and fire in his eyes. I felt every word he sang and there was SO much energy in his performance of 'Dancing on the side walk' that I felt he could have stepped right out of a professional production. However, I do see where other reviewers are coming from in regard to the dancing but i think Lauchlin suffered because of the choreography rather than his own 'campness'. Other standout performances for me were David Bowyer who was full of energy and had all the girls wanting more... or me at least! Very believable; and Phoebe Jackson as Serena who was the cutest, most adorable lost teenager we could hope for and certainly one of the strongest voices in the cast, reaching high notes with ease and certainty. I don't really want to mention the negative things because I was really very impressed but I feel obliged to just to make a point because of the comment written above, with which I strongly disagree. So here goes: The accents were a bit rough, I felt the students were simply in a different league to the adults (with the exception of Ryan) and I wanted to see more conflict and meaning behind their words. At times I felt they were just saying lines from the script. I didn't believe some of the relationships, such as Carmen and Schlomo but both were very strong as individual performers. And just to state again, the comment 'I am wondering why people write anything negative when it comes to community theatre reviews' is simply outrageous.
← Back to Theatre Reviews