Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Pocket Theatre Nov 08

Sun, 23 Nov 2008, 01:15 pm
John Grim7 posts in thread
A friend and I went along to 'Crackerjacks' (North Fremantle Bowling Club)to check out Pocket's latest offering. My friend thought it strange, that the words 'bowling club' and 'theatre' should appear in the same sentence. Fear not said I, for I had similar concerns when invited to a 'theatre production in the basement of the Swan Hotel.' We arrived (thanks to the clear and much appreciated signage) to find a bowling club much in the traditions of the many that dot our wonderful country. I'm pleased to say there was no cafe latte's or avocado and chilli muffins on offer, just your usual well priced drinks, and friendly staff on hand...tickets in hand we joined other patrons in front of the small stage. It was evident that stage sets and lighting were not the focus of the production (note: I think the sound and lighting people did a great job given the location of the equipment etc... now before I move onto making comments about the production, I confess again that I don't have any credentials to my name that entitle me to make judgement on plays, nor do I have the dictionary of buzz words that those better placed to critique do... all I have is my humble opinion, for the meagre amount that's worth...that said, onwards we go..the first play for the evening (Mariella Rossi, Where are you?) was written by Helen Brett. This well written peiece was performed admirably by Luciano Vecchio. My only negative (see I'm learning)is that I felt the story and interesting goings on in the Rossi family deserved a longer life than the 30 minutes given. Up next was 'The Mother Lode' a monologue by Liz Hoffman (a finalist in the 2007 Maj monologue competition. Again, this excellent script was given life by the talented Tracey Paulik. A very real story,touching at one moment, amusing at the next. 'Sex in the dead of winter' was next. Another piece written by Liz Hoffman (the winner of the 2008 MAJ monologue comp). Outstanding script, performed brilliantly by Craig Williams. It left me wondering how Liz could delve that accurately into the pysche of middle aged males. It reminded me to close my bedroom curtains at night. To close we had 'Serenade in Blue' written by Noel O'Neill, and performed by Noel and Valerie Dragojevic. Noel of course is well recognised for the talent that he is, and he was well supported in this touching play. I'm not going to give the premise away, for I feel that would spoil it. To close the show Helen Brett invited local writers to submit their material to Pocket for possible inclusion in future productions, with a guarantee that if not selected the writer would at least receive feedback on their submission. How precious is that to a writer. Having witnessed lots of local theatre with brilliant sets, and marvellous lighting, it felt good to walk away from this production feeling that the stories I'd seen and heard didn't need the support of set and lights. I guess that speaks volumes for what theatre is all about. Congratulations to the Pocket crew and Crackerjack staff for a most enjoyable evening. Long may the bowling club survive and with it too, Pocket theatre. I recommend that you get along and check it out, and please, whatever you do, don't ask the barman if they can possibly serve avocado and chilli smoothies at some stage in the future. cheers Johnny Grim A lad in sane productions

Thread (7 posts)

John GrimSun, 23 Nov 2008, 01:15 pm
A friend and I went along to 'Crackerjacks' (North Fremantle Bowling Club)to check out Pocket's latest offering. My friend thought it strange, that the words 'bowling club' and 'theatre' should appear in the same sentence. Fear not said I, for I had similar concerns when invited to a 'theatre production in the basement of the Swan Hotel.' We arrived (thanks to the clear and much appreciated signage) to find a bowling club much in the traditions of the many that dot our wonderful country. I'm pleased to say there was no cafe latte's or avocado and chilli muffins on offer, just your usual well priced drinks, and friendly staff on hand...tickets in hand we joined other patrons in front of the small stage. It was evident that stage sets and lighting were not the focus of the production (note: I think the sound and lighting people did a great job given the location of the equipment etc... now before I move onto making comments about the production, I confess again that I don't have any credentials to my name that entitle me to make judgement on plays, nor do I have the dictionary of buzz words that those better placed to critique do... all I have is my humble opinion, for the meagre amount that's worth...that said, onwards we go..the first play for the evening (Mariella Rossi, Where are you?) was written by Helen Brett. This well written peiece was performed admirably by Luciano Vecchio. My only negative (see I'm learning)is that I felt the story and interesting goings on in the Rossi family deserved a longer life than the 30 minutes given. Up next was 'The Mother Lode' a monologue by Liz Hoffman (a finalist in the 2007 Maj monologue competition. Again, this excellent script was given life by the talented Tracey Paulik. A very real story,touching at one moment, amusing at the next. 'Sex in the dead of winter' was next. Another piece written by Liz Hoffman (the winner of the 2008 MAJ monologue comp). Outstanding script, performed brilliantly by Craig Williams. It left me wondering how Liz could delve that accurately into the pysche of middle aged males. It reminded me to close my bedroom curtains at night. To close we had 'Serenade in Blue' written by Noel O'Neill, and performed by Noel and Valerie Dragojevic. Noel of course is well recognised for the talent that he is, and he was well supported in this touching play. I'm not going to give the premise away, for I feel that would spoil it. To close the show Helen Brett invited local writers to submit their material to Pocket for possible inclusion in future productions, with a guarantee that if not selected the writer would at least receive feedback on their submission. How precious is that to a writer. Having witnessed lots of local theatre with brilliant sets, and marvellous lighting, it felt good to walk away from this production feeling that the stories I'd seen and heard didn't need the support of set and lights. I guess that speaks volumes for what theatre is all about. Congratulations to the Pocket crew and Crackerjack staff for a most enjoyable evening. Long may the bowling club survive and with it too, Pocket theatre. I recommend that you get along and check it out, and please, whatever you do, don't ask the barman if they can possibly serve avocado and chilli smoothies at some stage in the future. cheers Johnny Grim A lad in sane productions
crgwllmsTue, 25 Nov 2008, 09:29 pm

Last three shows this week.

Thanks for the review, Johnny. Only a 6 show season...and you've now missed three! Johnny enjoyed it, and we've had great written feedback from audience members who've taken the time to fill in the questionnaire afterwards. Come and see for yourself, this Thursday, Friday and Saturday at 8.00pm. Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------
Gordon the OptomWed, 26 Nov 2008, 07:49 am

how about a date?

Like most people with an addiction, I live from day to day, by daily opening the 'What's on today' section, to check what to see tonight. Unfortunately your show hasn't been programmed into the list properly and doesn't appear, so I have missed a couple of opportunities.

This week is a busy one, so doubt if I will manage, many apologies.

Good to hear of the show's success.

crgwllmsWed, 26 Nov 2008, 10:29 am

Pocket season final shows - Thurs 27, Fri 28, & Sat 29 Nov.

Thanks for bringing that to our attention Gordon. I've sent a notice to Pocket Theatre, hopefully they can update the website so it notifies correctly. It's a shame, but it seems the only time it listed was November 3rd...nowhere near our actual season of Nov 20-29! In the meantime, please check this page for correct information! http://www.theatre.asn.au/production/2008/pocket_08_one_act_season Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------
stingerMon, 1 Dec 2008, 02:44 pm

"one-act plays by local dramatists"

Encouraged by JG's great review and forsaking other offerings, I went along to 'Crackerjacks' on Saturday night last. I must agree that it was a very entertaining show, well-written and complemented by a high standard of acting all-round. It seemed to me that there was a common theme running through all four pieces, being that of 'inability to express true feelings'. In one of the monologues, the character (who was an actor) was told by a family member something along the lines of "you're an actor, so you know how to express your feelings". Ironically, I overheard one of the actors remarking during the break that as an actor, one tended only to express one's true feelings when onstage and in character!? I suppose a true method actor would say one had to experience the expression of ones true feelings before one could act it...catch 22!!?? As to the definition of a 'one-act play', I believe the ITA Dramafest rules require at least 2 actors and a modicum of movement. This show by that token consisted of one long monologue, two short monologues and a medium-length duologue. I would like to see the definition clarified for future reference if you please!-) Well done, all! Ssstinger>>>
NormaMon, 1 Dec 2008, 04:16 pm

One-Act plays by local Dramatists

The definition of eligible plays 'allowed' in DramaFest is fairly simple.

A minimum of 2 persons, length between 20 mins and 45 mins. There is no restriction on "amount of movement"

The reason that this rule was instituted was that on several occasions the Festival appeared to be being "Hi-jacked" by some writers appearing merely to want  to  find an outlest for their monologues and this was felt not to be the most approriate 'use' of a one-act Festival which is designed to give a wide range to writers, actors and directors.

Maybe there should be a "Monologue/Duologue" section or indeed a Festival all on its' own??

Food for thought.

crgwllmsMon, 1 Dec 2008, 06:18 pm

Experience vs Expression

It may well have been me you are referring to in your post above, Stinger...! (I think I saw you when you were entering the venue, sorry I didn't get to meet you afterward.) While the popular premise of method acting is that you experience everything your character does...obviously (I hope) that doesn't quite work if your character is a murderer, or if what they go through on stage is completely away from your own personality. So you try to approximate the mind-set of the character, and amplify your own knowledge of feelings of malice and anger to allow you to come somewhat close onstage. So I guess I partly agree that you need to be able to acknowledge your true feelings in real life to help you to express them onstage...but it doesn't necessarily follow that you need to EXPRESS them in real life first. Performing can therefore be a kind of release for some actors (I'd say myself included): in real life they may not be actually brought to tears of rage or the wailing of despair, even if these are true feelings they have bottled inside themselves...but onstage they are allowed to show these innermost frailties, and to express them under the guise of 'acting'... The Catch-22 is that those who often perform get this emotional release onstage, and so they can arguably be more stable and contained in their real personas...so the ones you'd least expect to be capable of a rush of emotion might be the best ones to deliver it onstage..! (Similarly, how many great manic comedians are withdrawn and unfunny in their real-life personas?) Acting might be a real therapy to some....no wonder it attracts so many of us screwballs! Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------
← Back to Theatre Reviews