Rent
Sat, 8 Nov 2008, 05:06 pmMark Wickett8 posts in thread
Rent
Sat, 8 Nov 2008, 05:06 pm“Rent” tells the story of a year in the life of an eclectic mix of New York characters struggling with uncertainty, jealousy, hopelessness, losing love and losing life. Scott Nell directs the Adelaide premiere of this rock opera with conviction, making good use of the width and depth of the Star Theatre stage.
The ensemble pieces are this show’s strength, though there are individual standouts too: Rod Schultz’s “Collins” is a rock for the show, his jazz smooth but city-grime voice soaring where others missed their notes and he is utterly convincing when he takes us on his emotional ride with “Angel”, played with so much fun, life and complete credibility by James Christopher Reed, who relishes the best costumes of the show. Whitney Boyd gives us immense presence and power as “Maureen” and delivers a stunning duet with Deanna Farnell’s uptight “Joanne” – but there’s strength further down the cast list too: James Clark gets to enjoy playing dark and nasty and a snarly Petra Taylor nearly steals scenes with her ever mumbling homeless woman – and what a great shocking first line in “On The Street”!
Chemistry between the various couples is not always in abundance, but you truly believe the grief late in the second act. Matthew Carey’s band performs terrifically, high above the back of the stage and the well-executed stage design puts up with occasional strange positioning and movement of actors, but it doesn’t jar too much and is more than compensated for by the excellent choreography in “Tango: Maureen” and the superbly steamy “Contact”.
“Rent” is a story of tolerance and friendship despite the worst that life can throw at you – and the opening night certainly had its moments of trying to trip up the cast and crew with technical challenges, but these did not dampen the passion of the company and delivered us a show worthy of its last line “there’s no day like today”.
I saw this show last week
Sun, 16 Nov 2008, 03:07 pmWalter Plinge
I saw this show last week and agree with you. Nobody convinced me in this show - the chemistry was certainly missing. Roger was a bit too beefy to be dying of aids although he could sing relatively well he didn't convince me with his acting let alone his love affair with Mimi. I liked Collins and Mimi, but Maureen behaved like a 'brat' rather than a sultry flirt - vocally too she was all over the place singing out of key and couldn't reach the high notes - she was strikingly beautiful but voice needed more attention as did the direction of Over the Moon. Angel was 'cute' but couldn't dance to save his life, but he and Collins shared the best bond I would say. Nobody really stood out apart from Joanne, Collins and Mimi. The ensemble were very entertaining I think they overshadowed many of the leads. Terrific in bits but I think there needed to be more direction in many songs as most leads were just standing there singing without doing anything. Benny just faded away with the rest of them. Mark did a reasonable job. I would give it a six out of ten, as I saw the Melbourne one recently and that was definitely a top show. Musically it sounded a bit empty too and didn't have that grunge factor, but the musicians did what they could do with the restrictions they had to work with. I didn't dislike it but I didn't walk away thinking 'hey this is the cream of Adelaide talent' as the director stated in his program, it was a good mix but definitely not the best Adelaide has to offer. But go see for yourself, others have loved it, others have hated it. It's just one of those musicals you love or hate and need to judge for yourself.