Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

A Laughing Matter- Graduate Dramatic Society

Sat, 25 Oct 2008, 11:01 pm
Freddie Badgery4 posts in thread
Last night saw the opening of Grads' latest production, A LAUGHING MATTER, at the Dolphin Theatre at UWA. Originally commissioned by the National Theatre in London, A Laughing Matter (written by April De Angelis) is a bawdy romp of a play about a bawdy romp of a play. As it were. It tells the semi-fictional tale of David Garrick (Peter Clark), the most celebrated actor of his generation. He is caught between having to please his Patron, Lady Kensington (Meredith Daniel), by putting on the highly moralistic (and incredibly boring) 'A Fashionable Lover', and wanting to produce the much more low brow (but extremely funny) 'She Stoops To Conquer'. To add to his woes, his wife likes hiding in the closet, his actors like hitting the bottle, and his kidney stones like to act up at exactly the wrong moment. What's the most famous actor in the world to do? Sadly, he's forced to choose the former, and the second act explores the hilariously disastrous consequences of his choice. Having seen the fabulous poster, and knowing close to half the actors in the play, I was very much looking forward to seeing this show. And I can't say I was disappointed. The acting was above par for such a large cast (18 souls), the costumes (especially on Mrs Garrick and Mrs Woffington) were gorgeous, and the set design was well set up and executed. Furthermore, there are some genuinely funny, laugh-out-loud moments in this play, folks. One thing I unexpectedly enjoyed about this production was the pathos that the director, Susan Lynch, brought out. I was expecting and got, as stated above, a bawdy romp, but I was also treated to a psychological insight into a man who revolutionised the actor's art in no small measure. We see a strong insight into not only the power but the pitfalls a man of Garrick's reputation can find himself caught in. It is a cautionary tale as much as it is a full-of-fun farce. On the down side, however, the level of pathos running throughout the main body of the production serves to lessen the truly poignant moments of the final scenes. One might feel, as I did, that Dr Samuel Johnson's (Barry Park's) final revelation should be a heart breaker, simply because it comes as such a shock after the farcical fun of the scene that precedes it. However, the pathos is not so much to blame, methinks, as the other dreaded P word: PACE At two hours and forty-five mintues (not including interval) the play was far too long. One of my fellow attendees said afterwards that he would have taken a big red marker to the script, and whilst I am inclined to agree that a little pruning might have been in order, it was the energy of the actors and the speed of the cues that needed attention. In a play like this the pace is everything. A farce (which most of the second half of the play is) needs to be run so quickly that the actors are almost falling over each other to say their lines. Otherwise, it simply turns into, well, a farce... as it were. Having said that, there were some notable performers who really brought out the manic energy the play needed. Grant Watson was wonderful as Dr Goldsmith, and his wig should perhaps be considered for an award category of its own. In the same vein, Mrs Garrick (Alysha Cleeman) was a true delight to watch. Both actors brought a sense of heightened reality to their characters which gave their scenes a wonderful vitality. More please! Despite my grumblings over pace, the rest of the show was very good. I'd like to point out every actor in the show, not just the ones I mentioned, for each giving their character something special. To be short: they all had their moments. All in all, I would like to say that I had an entertaining evening and admired the actors for their work, especially in making themselves heard over a rather loud thunderstorm that happened to drop by. A Laughing Matter runs until the November 8th, bookings through Bocs.

Thread (4 posts)

Freddie BadgerySat, 25 Oct 2008, 11:01 pm
Last night saw the opening of Grads' latest production, A LAUGHING MATTER, at the Dolphin Theatre at UWA. Originally commissioned by the National Theatre in London, A Laughing Matter (written by April De Angelis) is a bawdy romp of a play about a bawdy romp of a play. As it were. It tells the semi-fictional tale of David Garrick (Peter Clark), the most celebrated actor of his generation. He is caught between having to please his Patron, Lady Kensington (Meredith Daniel), by putting on the highly moralistic (and incredibly boring) 'A Fashionable Lover', and wanting to produce the much more low brow (but extremely funny) 'She Stoops To Conquer'. To add to his woes, his wife likes hiding in the closet, his actors like hitting the bottle, and his kidney stones like to act up at exactly the wrong moment. What's the most famous actor in the world to do? Sadly, he's forced to choose the former, and the second act explores the hilariously disastrous consequences of his choice. Having seen the fabulous poster, and knowing close to half the actors in the play, I was very much looking forward to seeing this show. And I can't say I was disappointed. The acting was above par for such a large cast (18 souls), the costumes (especially on Mrs Garrick and Mrs Woffington) were gorgeous, and the set design was well set up and executed. Furthermore, there are some genuinely funny, laugh-out-loud moments in this play, folks. One thing I unexpectedly enjoyed about this production was the pathos that the director, Susan Lynch, brought out. I was expecting and got, as stated above, a bawdy romp, but I was also treated to a psychological insight into a man who revolutionised the actor's art in no small measure. We see a strong insight into not only the power but the pitfalls a man of Garrick's reputation can find himself caught in. It is a cautionary tale as much as it is a full-of-fun farce. On the down side, however, the level of pathos running throughout the main body of the production serves to lessen the truly poignant moments of the final scenes. One might feel, as I did, that Dr Samuel Johnson's (Barry Park's) final revelation should be a heart breaker, simply because it comes as such a shock after the farcical fun of the scene that precedes it. However, the pathos is not so much to blame, methinks, as the other dreaded P word: PACE At two hours and forty-five mintues (not including interval) the play was far too long. One of my fellow attendees said afterwards that he would have taken a big red marker to the script, and whilst I am inclined to agree that a little pruning might have been in order, it was the energy of the actors and the speed of the cues that needed attention. In a play like this the pace is everything. A farce (which most of the second half of the play is) needs to be run so quickly that the actors are almost falling over each other to say their lines. Otherwise, it simply turns into, well, a farce... as it were. Having said that, there were some notable performers who really brought out the manic energy the play needed. Grant Watson was wonderful as Dr Goldsmith, and his wig should perhaps be considered for an award category of its own. In the same vein, Mrs Garrick (Alysha Cleeman) was a true delight to watch. Both actors brought a sense of heightened reality to their characters which gave their scenes a wonderful vitality. More please! Despite my grumblings over pace, the rest of the show was very good. I'd like to point out every actor in the show, not just the ones I mentioned, for each giving their character something special. To be short: they all had their moments. All in all, I would like to say that I had an entertaining evening and admired the actors for their work, especially in making themselves heard over a rather loud thunderstorm that happened to drop by. A Laughing Matter runs until the November 8th, bookings through Bocs.
Gordon the OptomSun, 26 Oct 2008, 10:58 am

a little more review

‘A Laughing Matter’ by April De Angelis is directed by Susan Lynch for the Graduate Dramatic Society. It is showing at the Dolphin Theatre in UWA nightly, at 8.00 pm, until the 8th November.

             It is 1773 in The Turk’s Head, and Dr Samuel Johnson (Barry Park) introduces the first Act. Oliver Goldsmith (Grant Watson) has written a play which he wishes to have produced, however the Lord Chancellor only permits the operation of two theatres in London – both are booked. Goldsmith approaches David Garrick (Peter Clark) and asks if he will put on his show, but the Rev Cumberland (Peter Nettleton) got in first with his terrible play, his last being a commercial disaster.
              Garrick puts Sam (David Bruce), a young promising actor whom he has taken under his wing, into a major part. Garrick slowly realises that the Reverend’s play is total rubbish and goes back to Goldsmiths ‘She Stoops to Conquer’. Then virginal Hannah More (Michelle Berg) arrvives and asks (with blackmail) that Garrick reverts to the Reverend’s play, as it has morals and is not lewd like the Goldsmith farce.
            The company of actors have their say, and eventually a decision is made. Who will star in the production? Well, the casting couch was going strong even in those days. Where will it be staged? The owner of the land, Lady Kingston (Meredith Daniel) may well be influenced by Garrick’s actions – or was it Macklin’s (Stephen Greenacre) prowess which won her over?

This play, as Freddie has suggested, was touch long but generally the pace was very good on the Saturday night, with quick scene changes by the whole cast of 18 – many with two character parts. Directed with skill, traditional period performances, yet retaining plenty of fun in this bawdy romp. The script, comically graphic, was beautifully constructed with numerous double entendres and hilarious visual vulgarity as Garrick stabbed himself.

The director Susan Lynch has managed to include dancing, singing, farce, heavy dramatic acting, visual gimmicks, and several genres – and believe it or not, she gets away with them all.

The whole cast worked as a close team, squeezing every ounce of humour from the situations, but I must give special mention to Peter Clark and Grant Watson.

The display in the entrance hall with factual details of the characters was very well presented.

Totally admirable and enjoyable.

deadSun, 26 Oct 2008, 12:38 pm

And still more review ..........

Also went and saw this production on Saturday night with my partner and had a wonderful evening - well done to the GRADS cast and crew; you have a winner! I personally did not feel that the show was too long - we were all done and dusted by 10.30pm which I think is standard for most shows starting at 8pm. The fact that I didn't stare at my watch probably indicates that the show was engaging - we have all seen shows where seconds turn to hours! Overall the lighting and sound was good and helped support multiple scene changes throughout the show - always a dangerous thing to attempt but well executed here. The simple but effective set (and subtle changes) transferred us smoothly between each location and on occasion’s different times/years. Congratulations to the stage manager (Siobhan O'Gara) must be a very stressful environment back stage! With such a large cast (18 in total) you would be forgiven for thinking that there maybe at least a couple of 'lemons' - but not in this show. Well done to the director for finding such a strong cast (no easy task in Perth!) - the standard was very high; we certainly had a true sense of 'company'. The main reason for seeing this show, or the draw card if you like, was the fact that Peter Clark was appearing in it. We first saw him perform in Dangerous Obsession at Old Mill earlier in the year and have followed him since - 'Clark' fans! Again, we were not disappointed. A fantastic portrayal of David Garrick and effective characterization. Peter's ability to command the stage and draw the audience in is outstanding - you cannot help but be mesmerised by his overall performance and presence. Lovely subtleties within the character and varied range of emotions. This role needed to be the strong core and was well placed with Peter - a meritorious performance. Grant Watson (Goldsmith) & Barry Park (Johnson) were also stand-outs within this production. Grant manages to create an extreme Goldsmith character full of expression and passion - although bloody ugly! And what a fantastic wig! You could not help but laugh and fall for this mistake of a man. Barry's portrayal of Johnson was exemplary - a solid voice of authority and strong presence on stage. His scenes with Garrick were some of the strongest in the show. And what a lovely transformation to the 'supporting actor'! Allysha Cleeman had a lovely elegance as Mrs Garrick; sometimes a little hard to understand but overall very strong. Her interaction with Garrick seemed very natural and realistic - you believed they were husband and wife (with history). Also a wonderful opening dance routine in Act 2 - angelic. Domini Anderson as Peg Woffington was a joy to watch - provocative and very arousing! A strong character and overall 'bitch' experience achieved! The imposing cleavage also helped! Other strong performances included Stephen Greenacre as Macklin (also looks great in a dress!), Meredith Daniel as Kingston (ability to get into small places - very funny!), David Bruce as Cautherly (centered young man), Michelle Berg as Miss More (wolf in sheep’s clothing), Desiree Crossing as Mrs Barry (Sultry vixen) and Tom Rees as Boswell (enjoyable character). A Laughing Matter is a great show - a solid evening of entertainment. A wonderful script brought to life by a strong cast. I would certainly recommend to anyone seeking an enjoyable evening. All the best to the cast and crew for the rest of the season - you should all be proud. DW
Walter PlingeSun, 2 Nov 2008, 03:27 am

Steak Could Use More Sizzle

"I had to calm the audience somehow. Entertaining them seemed the only option". I saw the show the other night and was well entertained. As the reviewers have said, it is a classy, meaty combined effort. However, I was particularly looking out for the 'farce-pace' aspect mentioned by FB and I think I may have nailed it. Act II Scene IV, when the company is frantically trying to perform to a feral audience (on the opposite side of the stage from the real audience), some of the characters seem to be still in a world of their own, oblivious to the seriousness of the situation exploding around them. While that may be consistent with the attitude of those characters as developed, it does detract from what could otherwise be an even more hilarious piece of pace-farce. I would have liked to have seen all of them almost 'break character' and throw the switch to PANIC. Also, there does seem to be a lot of scenes where everyone is standing in a line across the stage. Okay for curtain calls, but...
← Back to Theatre Reviews