Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Gaslight

Sat, 11 Oct 2008, 07:49 am
Gordon the Optom15 posts in thread

‘Gaslight’ is a thriller, written 70 years ago by Patrick Hamilton. The latest production from the Old Mill Theatre in South Perth, it is showing until 25th October.

         The location is the front room of a reasonably well-to-do house in London in the 1880s. The owner, Jack Manningham (Robert Whyte), is a bullying, philandering husband whom seems to get great pleasure from taunting his loving, delicate wife Bella (Mia Martin). Bella’s mother died in a madhouse ‘with little brain left’ and poor Bella is certain that she is destined for the same fate.

         There are two servants, the elderly dedicated Elizabeth (Rosemary Longhurst) and young flighty, yet slightly mysterious, Nancy (Dannielle Ashton).

         One evening when the master of the house is out visiting friends, Detective Rough arrives and asks to see the Mrs Manningham. Although retired, when the caring Detective Rough has a bee in his bonnet, he won’t rest until the problem has been cleared up.

Although there is one murder in the story, this is really more of a psychological thriller. The script captures the chauvinistic era well, and has the audience wondering if what is obvious is in fact true.

The curtains opened slowly (how rarely one sees a simple act like this used to effect) to gradually reveal the dimly lit room – and the smell of fresh paint, the set being finished only hours before. The décor was probably the best I have seen for a community production in many a year (Hywel Williams and Tim Prosser), so it was little wonder that there was a round of applause before even a word was spoken. The props and soft furnishing (Julie Cecchi and Tina Wilton) made the room truly lived-in! It was obvious that a great deal of thought had gone into the costumes (Jenny Prosser) which were correct for the period. The crux of the play depended upon the gas lighting, and the John Spurling’s ambience was authentic.

Director, Sally Barendse, had already shown the strength of her production team and now with a superb cast, each and everyone outstanding, the show just took off. I am sure that this talented cast, will not mind me giving a special mention of Mia as the downtrodden, demented mistress of the house.

A fairly simple story but riveting. Quality and magnificent.

Lose the beards, boys.

Wed, 22 Oct 2008, 11:26 am
I infer from the comments made by 'Interested Observer' such as "..a lot of time and effort was put into this production.." that 'IO' was in fact on the other side of the fourth wall from the audience, or at least someone closely associated with the show. I did read that review before I went to see the show but I declare that it had no influence on me whatsoever. This is not a very nice play. It is a story about domestic violence of the psychological kind. None of the characters are very likeable. The senior maid seems to be, but she is in fact surreptitiously betraying her employer. The heroic (or should it be anti-heroic?) detective is obsessed with finding the evidence to prove his case and shows very little concern or compassion for the victims. The wife is weak and frenzied, the junior maid is a brazen hussy and the husband is a thorough bastard. Added to that, the storyline is fairly thin and there seems to be a long stretch in the first act where nothing much happens and an audient may be forgiven for drifting off. Having said all that, there were some very positive things about this show. The set and lighting design was excellent. The acting was slightly variable but generally good. The husband was suitably nasty but there was not much chemistry between him and the convincingly slutty junior maid. The wife was so consistently hysterical that I was sure Sgt Rough was going to slap her even if her husband didn't. Unlike 'IO', I found Rough to be more of an alco-pop than a fine wine - aerated with nervous energy, saccharine sweet but with an edge of thinly disguised animal cunning. No wonder his daughters liked the character!-) Finally - about the beards. I accept that 'flowing beards were all the go' in the Victorian era, even among the gentry and police. They would not have been the neatly styled and trimmed versions we see in this show however!-) Seriously though and speaking as one who has been bearded for a good deal of his adult life, I think it makes an actor's use of facial expression a lot more difficult if a good third of his 'fizz' is covered in fuzz. Well done, all. Ssstinger>>>

Thread (15 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews