Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Wizard of Oz

Sat, 19 Jan 2008, 11:13 am
Craigo94 posts in thread

So I found myself catapulting through Kansis aka Mandurah once more on opening night of MPAC's Wizard of Oz - haven't I been here before. Perhaps I too suffer from the bump on my head the size of an ostrich egg (Is that the bump or my head? - I'm a little confused)

I must say there definately are improvements from last time. The budget must have doubled. It's at least $4 now.

The Sets - I believe Kansis is purposely a little dull to enhance the Land of Oz. At times you had to imagine a few things here & there but that wasn't too hard. I'm sold anyhow. Lots of surprises too which I won't spoil but needless to say you have to keep your eyes peeled to capture the odd & strange detail here & there, and widen them sometimes to take it all in :lol:

The Actors - With a few new names on the bill I believe they all did really well. There's 2 Dorothy's (Jenn Wickham & Alison Hill) & insiders tell me they each have their strengths - and both are equally good to watch! I saw Jenn (Dorothy) & was nearly in tears over her dilema of losing Toto (Rusty). Even if the dog made strange transformations into a cane basket at times!

The Witch (Carole Dhu) absolutely glows with nastiness. There's so many kids there in Munchkinlad I pity the directors. The S'crow (Kim Godleman.), Tin boy (Jesse Angus) & Putty Cat (Darren Bilston) were wonderfully different from each other & captured the roles really well. Aunt Em/Glinda (Karen Godfrey)were 2 distinct characters but with the same warmth & fuzzy love. Unc' Henry (Malcolm Pratt) was certainly a father come uncle figure for her niece & wonderfully riled Miss Gultch (Carole Dhu) up at every opportunity. As the Guard he certainly was mad but a little predictable & perhaps aimed at the younger audience specifically. The Professor/Wizard (Laurence Williams) was a strange choice but only in that he was young. He held his character so well that I was completely convinced of the realism of Oz whenever he was around! All the minor leads did a great job too with Peter Rogers (Barrister/Tree/Monkey/Winkee General) stealing much of the show. Each minor lead though brought a great angle to each scene.

The Tech's - As usual with MPAC crew they've brought their magic to the fore. Lights intelligently worked out - changing the moods. Some large changes that were seeming done in no time at all. The usual opening night jitters too. Sometimes I feel that the Centre really doesn't give the boys enough time to tech rehearse as the opening night of many shows held there have issues. Opening night problems was for microphones this time. Cutting in, dropping out, interference. I heard that 2nd night went without any sound hitches AT ALL. Come on MPAC admin. Get/Let them get that quality on Opening!

The Band - It's so nice to hear the live sound. MPAC has done well in keeping I believe some professional players in their midst. It appears that it's so much easier for the cast with them in the pit. There' only 5 of them too but the lads (& a lass?) are playing so many instruments down there that there's a class to it all. Perhaps an international feeling.

It certainly made me think that with a Pro & Semi-Pro team around a cast that a local production like this one can be very convincing & thoroughly enjoyable. Go on, Go see it!

The Script

Tue, 22 Jan 2008, 01:29 pm
Walter Plinge
Surely people going to see this show know the film very well and due to copyright they would have to stick to the script that would they not. Sting says that there was no originality to the cast members, would you rahter them take away from the magic that was formed over 50 years ago? Having read the script The Wicked Witch has actually got the jokes written into her dialog, so therefore the script broke the villan not the actor. You say there was no originality in the show, apart from Glinda, however OZ himself was quite orignial would you not think. Many people would watch the show expecting an old man, at no time is there any indication to his age. As sting says a boy? This was clearly a man and not a boy and would have got the role for a reason. The set changes are a little slow and sometimes under appreciated, however if the budget was there a lot more would have been spent on this equipment. As for the audience member who walked out. You must know that characters go on a jounney and in the first act they had just all met how could a bond be created in a first instance., clearly you walked out and didn't see the tight bond and the warm fuzzy feeling the created in the 2nd act. I think it was quiet nieve and impatient of you to have left at that point, But obviously you want things spelt out to you in black and white. I had a lady in tears next to me by the end of the show due to the emotion portrayed by Dorothy and the 3 other leads (emotionless I don't think so Sting) These people have all trained in professional fields and you can see that bought to stage. I strongly suggest seeing it.

Thread (94 posts)

Wizard of OzCraigo19 Jan 2008
← Back to Theatre Reviews