Babes in the Wood - Marloo Theatre
Sat, 17 Nov 2007, 04:01 pmPaul Treasure6 posts in thread
Babes in the Wood - Marloo Theatre
Sat, 17 Nov 2007, 04:01 pmOne of my favourite pieces of bitchy crit goes something like this:
"There is nothing like a good Panto, and this was... nothing like a good Panto!"
Unfortunately it is a line that has been able to be used all too frequently in Perth for a good many years.
Imagine my surprise when I came out of "Babes in the Wood" and I COULDN'T use the line!
This show was actually good!
Despite what many people think Panto is very difficult style to pull off well, and while this show was far from perfect, it was definitely well over the line as far as enjoyability goes, which is the main requirement of Panto after all.
The first question for the success of a Panto relies on two pieces of casting, the Dame and the Principal Boy, cast them well and you are half way there! And well cast these two roles were...
[Note: no programmes opening night... I AM going to forget names!]
What can I say about the casting of Rod Vermeij as Dame Delightful?
Best. Dame. Ever!
No, seriously, I have seen many dames in my time, and been them on more than one occasion, and Rod's portrayal was assured and well placed and HILARIOUS! All the time I was watching him, all I could think was, this is what Sir Ian McKellen's Dame must have been like - WELL DONE!
Ashley Warner as the Principal Boy, Princess Lucinda (trust me, if you've seen this show you will agree that the princess IS the prinicpal boy role) was also a delight. Well handled, believable, looked good in the tights...
From these two star performances the rest of the cast are evenly spread from "very well done" through to "the least said the better". But I don't have time [or a programme :-(] to go through them all.
As I said at the beginning, it is not a perfect Panto, but it is thoroughly enjoyable, and very energetic, and far better than many Pantos I've seen recently.
If you want an idea of how good Panto can be, you could do worse than checking this one out!
Well done!
Keep the energy up guys and you are on a winner!
Paul TreasureSat, 17 Nov 2007, 04:01 pm
One of my favourite pieces of bitchy crit goes something like this:
"There is nothing like a good Panto, and this was... nothing like a good Panto!"
Unfortunately it is a line that has been able to be used all too frequently in Perth for a good many years.
Imagine my surprise when I came out of "Babes in the Wood" and I COULDN'T use the line!
This show was actually good!
Despite what many people think Panto is very difficult style to pull off well, and while this show was far from perfect, it was definitely well over the line as far as enjoyability goes, which is the main requirement of Panto after all.
The first question for the success of a Panto relies on two pieces of casting, the Dame and the Principal Boy, cast them well and you are half way there! And well cast these two roles were...
[Note: no programmes opening night... I AM going to forget names!]
What can I say about the casting of Rod Vermeij as Dame Delightful?
Best. Dame. Ever!
No, seriously, I have seen many dames in my time, and been them on more than one occasion, and Rod's portrayal was assured and well placed and HILARIOUS! All the time I was watching him, all I could think was, this is what Sir Ian McKellen's Dame must have been like - WELL DONE!
Ashley Warner as the Principal Boy, Princess Lucinda (trust me, if you've seen this show you will agree that the princess IS the prinicpal boy role) was also a delight. Well handled, believable, looked good in the tights...
From these two star performances the rest of the cast are evenly spread from "very well done" through to "the least said the better". But I don't have time [or a programme :-(] to go through them all.
As I said at the beginning, it is not a perfect Panto, but it is thoroughly enjoyable, and very energetic, and far better than many Pantos I've seen recently.
If you want an idea of how good Panto can be, you could do worse than checking this one out!
Well done!
Keep the energy up guys and you are on a winner!
Walter PlingeSat, 17 Nov 2007, 04:25 pm
well you saw a different
well you saw a different show to me then, I was there Friday night, and the lack of energy from the stage was astounding. Although there were a couple of stand out performances for me. The dame was def one of the highlights of the show, Asheley as the Princess was ok, but as soon as she started to sing it let her down. Although she did a fairly good job of Someone to watch over me. the woman who played the Queen was excellent, and her song was well presented. But the man who played Boggle was absoloutely awesome, he had me in his big green hand from the moment he appeared. It was unfortunate that he was only in the second act. I found the man who played the evil wizard very overbearing, and thought he overacted his way through his performance. The rest were sort of a blur. It is unfortunate that the chorus left a lot to be desired. Kudos to the horse "Trojan" the tap routine in the 3rd act was fabulous. Lighting was ordinary, but the sound was fairly good. All in all it was a passable attempt in my opinion. and i guess that is what it is about - your own opinion. everybody should make up their own minds. But to have an opinion you have to see it. So no flames at me, because at least I went and saw it.
Walter PlingeSun, 18 Nov 2007, 01:04 pm
Great fun
Firstly I have to say I have 2 family members in the cast which you will say influences my opinion (and of course that's true to a certain extent) but I do try to be honest in my feedback to them. I saw the show last night (Sat),for the first time, with my family ranging from ages 4 to 83. Sure, as mentioned before it's not a 'perfect' show, but they all really enjoyed it and thought it was a great fun show. The 4 year old loved being able to 'help' the fabulous dame find Nip & Tuck and the 'big scary spider'. None of us are 'theatre buffs' and so didn't watch it with any knowledge or experience in acting, lighting, sound, etc, etc. Just loved the characters, songs and costumes and the light heartedness of an end of year panto. Thanks to all in and behind the show for all your hard work and a good fun night!!
HeraldicSun, 18 Nov 2007, 08:50 pm
Bec
Well bec hoddle, I suggest you go back to Broadway and pay $100 US a ticket. Considering the the amount of technical & cast difficulties this production had to endure , it stands out a fantastic piece of Community Theatre!. I would challenge anyone to witness a Panto horse tap dancing in perfect timing elsewhere. Dame Delightful was carried off with excellent delivery by an accomplished actor. Mr Treasures review is spot on!
Walter PlingeThu, 29 Nov 2007, 08:34 am
What do you mean Heraldick
What do you mean Heraldick by the statement: "Considering the the amount of technical & cast difficulties this production had to endure..."? Did it have technical and cast difficulties?
HeraldicSat, 12 Jan 2008, 12:10 pm
Yes. A freind of mine said
Yes. A freind of mine said the show had script, and production difficulties that threatened to cancel the show entirely at several points in time. Much more I cannot say, but this being the case the cast should be commended for the result.