Rent - WA Regal Theatre

Mon, 12 Nov 2007, 11:07 pm

Asta57 posts in thread

Okay so it was bound to happen a review of RENT. Firstly I know that this post is going to cause contraversy and I'm prepared for the barrage of tweenies who will defend their pop idols to the end. So I will say it now... this is only my opinion and I am entitled to it. I also think that when it comes to reviewing I try to be as fair and informative as possible without getting too personal as I know how hard it is to put on a show like this. So here goes. I went and saw the Sunday night (November 11th) performance of RENT. I was very surprised by the small audience considering how much advertising this show has had. Overall I had an enjoyable experience of Rent. It wasn't fantastic and it wasn't crap but it was a nice way to spend a Sunday afternoon. What I didn't like: The first half seemed very slow and very unenlivaning (I know I spelt that wrong). The opening song of Rent was painful to watch. That song is about tension and the music moves at such a pace that something exciting should be going on. But all the characters did was look either at each other or out into the audience and sing their lines. It was boring. I hated the end. Maureen and Joanne rolled up thier coats in such a way that when Mimi lied down to almost die she looked incredibly uncomfortable and it looked terrible. Roger should have had more connection with her at this point but instead he seemed very detatched and apart from her. The girl is dying the least you could do is touch her. There were a lot of instances where the characters sang out into the audience and I mean a lot of instances. Sometimes it worked but a lot of the time it just made me feel very uncomfortable and made the actors look like they had forgotten what they were suppossed to do next. Out tonight was boring. Jaya needed to let go more and be much more sexual. She seemed confined in that small spaced and clumsy climbing on the railings. The voice was fantastic she just needed the moves to match. Ruth was too young to play the mother and her timing was very off in this performance. Which is disspointing cause I know how talented she is. What I loved: Shane Janek. All I can say is wait for act II. He seemed really nervous at the beginning (and almost out of breath in today for you tomorrow for me) but he hit everything perfect in the second act. Joanne! What an amazing voice. She was fantastic. Every time she sang I was amazed but she really shon in Take me or Leave me especially when competing with the star power of Nikki. She was a brilliant actress and singer and her short dance in Tango maureen left Anthony to shame. He couldn't keep up. The guy who played Collin was fantastic. During the reprise of I'll cover you I was nearly in tears. His voice was so full of emotion and he was so beautiful to listen to and watch. an amazing talent. The staging was excellent and allowed the cast to create very distinct areas for the story to unfold. I also liked the idea of having the band on stage. It was very eariee to see the drug dealer guy slink out from under the scaffolding too. The Christmas bell guy stole the show every time he came on stage. Just goes to show you don't need a big part to be a star. He was so funny and had great timing. Good singer too. The voices. The entire cast and I mean entire cast was fantastic vocally. Couldn't fault a single one of them. The Idols: Nikki. I really think that despite a fantastic voice and a really sound performance, she was not right for the part of Maureen. She looked too young and like she was trying too hard to be comfortable with being a bitch and a slut. She also didn't match up with Joanne very well who I loved. But what a voice. Anthony. What a beautiful voice. He was gorgeous to listen to but dreadful to watch. He didn't do anything. It was like watching Ken act. He was very very boring. Shane. I've said enough. Actually I've said enough all together. I could go on for hours. There was so much that I enjoyed about this show and so much I hated. All in all if you have the cash it is worth a look, but I wouldn't make a special trip for it. Love for now Kate. Looking forward to the backlash.

Thread (57 posts)

Threaded Flat

AstaMon, 12 Nov 2007, 11:07 pm

Walter PlingeMon, 12 Nov 2007, 11:37 pm

RENT

The "guy" who played collin was Shai Yammanee, one of Perths greatest home grown talents. If your going to review a performance, read the programme first.

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 12:22 am

I was at the sunday show at

I was at the sunday show at 5.00pm on the 11th too.. I agree with most of your post, except for a few of the things you didn't like.. Re: the opening song "Rent"...I didn't mind the minimal movement considering that all of the characters and their relationships were established in the first song.. at least I was able to concentrate on the lyrics and find out who was who. Plus, they did change positions on stage once or twice during the song as I recall (which was enough in my opinion, and happened at times when there was no singing). Re: the rolling of the coats... looked fine on the second level up stairs where I was sitting. Perhaps downstairs it may have looked different? dunno ps-if you hated the end, then you're pretty much saying you hated the way they did it on broadway, because it was very similar...check youtube.. Re: Out tonight... what would you prefer... Mimi swinging around like a pole dancer and singing like crap, or awesome singing and a little less of the movement... hahah if you reply with saying you want the best of both, then wack on a pair of knee highs, go down to your local park at night time, shine torches in your eyes, and then try your luck on the monkey bars hehe. Didn't look easy! Re: The mother,.. I couldn't really see how old she looked from where I was sitting... but I was up the back.. where abouts were you? I agree, with the voices being amazing! Sounded very tight! I agree with the review on the celebrities.. you didn't mention tim campbell though.. I thought he rocked. Also, dunno how old the character Maureen is supposed to be.. but I thought Nikki at the age of 20 was acceptable.. plus I think that her performance was awesome considering she had a fractured foot and her mic stopped working.. so I think she did a fantastic job considering! Looked fricking hot too! As far as things that I thought that could have been done better, there was nothing major.. Perhaps the main characters were looking out a little bit too much, but it's a musical and it's theatre, so I wasn't too phased by that. Ps- I was sitting towards the back on the second level because I couldn't get a better seat ....so it must have sold reasonably well..

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 12:23 am

In my opinion 'Rent' was

In my opinion 'Rent' was incredibly professional, and produced complete brilliance!! Espacially vocally, this show is beyond professional! You are guaranteed goosebumps! Definite stand-outs: Sharon Wisniewski, Shai Yammanee, Andrew Conaghan. Tim, Shane and Anthony (as in 'celebs') were excellent. Nikki Webster in performance makes me sick.. FOOORCES a performance, vocally AND visually. But I reccomend, an enjoyable experience! :)

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 12:33 am

I went to Saturday

I went to Saturday night.. It was so cool! Wasn't it like Anthony's 1st or 2nd musical? kate.. a little harsh don't you think? He'll learn in time! I can not express how AMAZING the singing during the entire show was! It was like being at a rock concert but better! It was WAYYYYY better than Cruising! Jamie ps- Mike,hahahah I might try that monkey bar thing and get back to you!

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 10:13 am

I saw Rent on Friday the

I saw Rent on Friday the 9th and I have to agree with Kate in the original post. I hadn't seen Rent staged before and so was looking forward to it and I was quite disappointed. For the most part I was just totally bored; I found it hard understand what was going on and there didn't seem to be a lot of flow; it was all disjointed and more like a concert version. I guess the biggest thing for me is that I didn't feel the characters; it was just people singing. I agree that the death scene at the end was just terrible; I almost laughed, it seemed like something out of a daytime soap opera...very melodramatic. And yes, it must have been terrible on Broadway too if this is how they did it there. Technically-wise, I thought the lighting was great, very sharp and great operation on the night that I saw it, so well done to the operator/s. The sound was all over the place, and it might just have been the mike quality, but the vocals sounded very tinny and made it extremely hard to understand what was being said in a lot of parts especially since I didn't know the lyrics. The band was really good; a little loud at the beginning but the levels were soon under control and it was great to hear some fabulous musicians playing some great songs. Performers; As mentioned in a previous post, Shai was absolutely outstanding...the reprise of I'll Cover You was the only time in the show that I was completely lost in what was happening on stage. What a magnificent voice this man has and not a fault to be heard. Just listening to this one song almost made it worth the price of my ticket. I also loved Joannes voice; very strong and very clear...another standout for me. I quite liked Nikki Webster in her solo song, the rest of the performance didnt do much for me, but I thought she did well on her own. I don't like Anthony Calleas nasal voice particularly and his acting was shocking. Tim Campbell was better; I liked his edgy rock sound but his vocal performance wasn't consistent. I do however, think his acting was better than the other two. I was very impressed with Shane Janek; he seemed very in control of his entire performance and I enjoyed his character. I guess this is the great debate that has gone on in the lead up and will probably never stop, but James, I don't care if it is Anthony's first or second musical, for the money that I paid to see this show, I expect all of the performers to be fantastic.... and in character at least. I know that a lot of work went into this show and I absolutely appreciate that, but a great singer does not automatically make a great musical theatre performer.This is all just my opinion, and if you loved this show, that is great because it makes the hard work worthwhile to stage a show like this. Unfortunately I thought it was below the overall standard that I expected. But thank you to all involved for the effort that has gone into this, and best of luck to everyone for the rest of the run.

DazzaBTue, 13 Nov 2007, 10:19 am

I saw the Sunday

I saw the Sunday performance of Rent as well and I have to say I probably come down somewhere in the middle of the reviews posted so far. The vocal work on this show was impeccable - simply impeccable. Easily the strongest, fullest vocal ensemble I have heard in a while - Bravo. I have to agree that Anthony was a bit wooden and 'Ken' like - but then I felt that about him while he was on Idol as well. Also, he is still learning the craft of acting and I'm going to reserve judgement on the poor boy until he's had some time to develop. Shai Yammanee virtually stole the show with the "I'll Cover You" reprise. Simply breathtaking! I love to see our home-growns showing what Perth performers are made of! Unfortunately, I couldn't stomache Nikki Webster. Now before y'all jump down my throat on this, I think I have discovered the reason for why I felt this way. Maureen is a very adult character, and while Nikki has clearly grown up since the olympics and that hideous Strawberry Kisses song, I couldn't get the memory of them out of my head. Unfortunately I couldn't view her performance as Maureen for what it was without being influenced by my own pre-conceptions. I think that those of us who reacted like I did are going to have to admit that we actually can't judge her performance from an objective perspective. Sadly though, this did interrupt my enjoyment of the show as I couldn't stand the scenes that Maureen was in. Sigh... I felt that the set was effective and despite the few hitches (and lets be honest, we always get them) the techs for the show were quite good. Just quickly though to anyone who may be thinking about jumping down Kate's (or anyone's) neck for her opionion. If you feel differently, good for you - but there's no need to attack anyone about their opinion, so long as they give a balanced and constructive review (like Kate did). People are entitled to not like something - just as you are entitled to like it. This production of Rent will stand or fall on it's own two feet (and personally I think it will stand) let people have their opinions and stand by yours! Darren

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 11:26 am

Saturday Night

I thought the show was well done. I agree with a lot of the comments made thus far. On a different note.. The musical hasn't been done too often in WA to my knowledge, so there's no real bench mark here, unless you want to compare it to the DVD/film version (which I wouldn't recommend doing because it is an entirely different medium), or a broadway show (which not many of us get the opportunity to see anyway). I didn't have any preconceived ideas about this version of the show. It's a shame that people have taken their previous perceptions of the actors into consideration when writing their reviews. I guess at the end of the day, it's tough to ignore who is playing which character. However, I'm sure that if the girl who played mimi (Jaya) sang a pop-single at the age of 13 instead of nikki, then we'd be all ultra critical of her instead... if you get my drift.. I understand that some people may not like some of the actors who have been cast, but I try to look at the show as a whole. I thought it was good... do you generally agree? From a business management background, I understand that there is a need to secure larger names in order to make it economically feasible to put good shows on in larger venues. There needs to be a mix of big names and no-names and this all comes down to money and bums on seats... otherwise the show wont sell, and cancellations of productions will occur. I also know that 'dream casts' of who I'd probably like to see in the roles are also not always feasible due to contract and money restraints. So taking that into consideration, I am sure the director and producers have cast to the best of their ability, using the resources and performers that were available. All in all, I agree with the bulk of the comments that have been posted regarding individual performances, however I am a little more forgiving because I know how the industry works, and how tough it is to secure names that will sell shows, making it possible for Perth to see good theatre. Grant ps- hahah monkey bars hilarious!

sarah_limTue, 13 Nov 2007, 11:49 am

Yellow Glass did production

Yellow Glass did production of RENT a couple of years ago at the Bakery Artrage, though it wasn't as highly publicised as the current production. The same direction team though I believe? I really enjoyed that production - it was a nice intimate venue and the cast was fantastic! Rhoda Lopez was playing Mimi, however the show I saw, Mimi was played by Devon Plumley (forgive me if I spell any of the names wrong!) and she did a great job! I remember "Take Me or Leave Me" was a stand out number for me in that production. The actresses playing Joanne and Maureen had wonderful belt voices. Again, sorry for not remembering your names... I have the program somewhere at home!

DazzaBTue, 13 Nov 2007, 11:54 am

Grant, In response to what

Grant, In response to what you are saying here about previous perceptions of actors, I actually totally agree. I wish I could have viewed Nikki's performance without being informed by her previous work, but I couldn't. I don't know why, but I couldn't. This being the case, I chose not to comment on her actual performance because I believe I would be giving a highly biassed opinion. I'm trying to be as fair as I can. I suppose though that this is something many child performers encounter when making the transition from child to adult in the public eye. And I agree - had Jaya been the one to have released a single at the age of 13 then the criticism would go her way instead - hence I tried not to criticise. I can't say that I liked Nikki's performance, but I'm not going to say anything bad about it cause I don't think I can do so fairly. But all in all, I have to agree with you. I thought it was a good production. I hope anyone who saw the travesty that was the movie (and yes, I am aware that I'm going to get some lash back here, but as this is a site devoted to theatre I don't think it's the right forum to discuss my views on the movie in any detail) comes and sees the story told properly on stage. They do a good job. Darren

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 12:04 pm

Hey Darren,I was overseas

Hey Darren, I was overseas in 2000 during the Olympics, so I didn't even know who Nikki Webster was until I saw her in FHM many years later hehehe! So I guess I can't see what all the fuss and bother is about. It was very easy for me not to compare her to anything! She's only 20 and I thought her voice was very mature for her age. I'm glad I was able to see her perform at last and thought she sang well. She had a fractured foot apparantly, so thumbs up for not pulling out! Which was your favourite scene in the show?... I much liked the ones where the entire cast was on stage. Seasons of Love looked like a lot of fun to sing! Grant

DazzaBTue, 13 Nov 2007, 12:39 pm

Favourite Scenes

Hey Grant, By far the show stealing moment for me was Collins singing the reprise of "I'll Cover You" as I believe other people have already said. Yammanee had me with tears streaming down my face. I can't thank him enough for his beautifully touching rendition of the charcater of Collins - probably my favourite character in the show. Overall, the show excelled during choral moments. The sound produced by the Vocal Ensemble was simply breathtaking. In particular Seasons of Love. I've performed that song before and it's bloody hard work - this bunch of people are all clearly extremely talented! Other than that, I also really liked "Another Day" - it's one of my show faves and I think Jaya and Tim did a great job. I've always loved belting that one out with my friends - it's fun and fiery and I think they pulled it off. Actually Tim Campbell surprised me. Not knowing anything about him (because I don't watch television anymore) I didn't have expectations of him at all and I thought he was great. The surprise came when I found out he's a H&A star - all the more reason for me to maintain my embargo on television - it clouds my brain! I really wish I could have viewed Nikki from the same perspective. Sigh... Although, credit where credit is due! I didn't knwo she had a fractured foot! Way to go Nikki Webster! That's an achievement and a half! Darren

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 01:58 pm

Boring, badly acted and

Boring, badly acted and really uninspired directing. YGT's first go was far better. The standouts were those with acting training (Collins, Joanne, Benny) who understood what they were singing. The ensemble sounded good, but such very amateur acting. The band, as usual, were awesome. Larson would not be happy.

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 02:44 pm

Hi Larson,I respect your

Hi Larson, I respect your comments and opinions. However I disagree. The ensemble were not amateurish at all. I've seen most of these actors in shows before and also met and spoke to them in person throughout the years. They are the best in Perth and I think they did a fantastic job supporting the leads. I have read every bio in the program, and I can guarentee that half the stuff they have achieved isn't even mentioned because there is not enough space for it to be written... Many of them have studied in vocal and acting courses since very young ages, and quite a few of them have reserved their university years for different tertiary qualifications (other than acting) to fall back on. A wise thing to do given there is no money in Musical Theatre... What you're suggesting is that a three year course in an acting school is better than 10-15 years experience in performance, supplemented by years and years of vocal and acting training through a variety of differnet courses on offer?I think they equate to about the same,especially considering that most of the shorter courses that are on offer are run by the same people who run the 3 year courses. You wont see a better ensemble for quite some time. Sare

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 02:57 pm

I went to Friday night's

I went to Friday night's show. Prefer their 2005 version better, so this version really didn't do it for me. (Remounting a show after an already successful season is not always such a good idea...) The opening scene was far too slow and uninspiring, and by the interval I wasn't convinced... Jaya Henderson didn't exude enough sexuality or have that raw quality needed for Mimi, and Anthony Callea was about as exciting as a piece of driftwood. Tim Campbell did a great job, though I would agree he did seem very detached in Mimi's dying moment... Nikki Webster is just annoying full stop. What saved me in the second act was Joanne's performance overall (Sharon W) and some good chorus harmonies... but apart from that, I came out disappointed.

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 02:59 pm

Darren, yeah I totally

Darren, yeah I totally agree with you.. That Shai guy was awesome! and yes, it certainly lifted when the whole cast was on stage! I spoke to Nikki after the show and I saw the brace she was wearing on her leg/foot... it looks pretty bad! Apparantly she did it on monday last week. So at least she's hanging in there!

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 04:06 pm

All I'm going to say is

All I'm going to say is that I haven't seen it yet but I'm going to, and I find it really hard to take seriously a review that is so poorly written.

Walter PlingeTue, 13 Nov 2007, 04:08 pm

why do we put up with it?

i find it astounding that perth is still prepared to consider themselves as a less than substandard theatre community by accepting such things as "Wasn't it like Anthony's 1st or 2nd musical? ... He'll learn in time" or "then wack on a pair of knee highs, go down to your local park at night time, shine torches in your eyes, and then try your luck on the monkey bars" - i'm sorry to get a bit b*tchy - but no wonder perth doesn't get the musical/acting credits it deserves when the theatre going public are prepared to put up with substandard performances based on celebrity or lack of experience. as far as i'm aware, yellowglass put on this same production a couple of years ago with a cast of "unknowns" (though looking at their resume's, the majority being consummate performers) and the show sold out with more performances being demanded (even on this website!) plus, from what i'm reading here - the people being given the most credit ARE the supposed "unknowns" - and the celebs are being given free passes for not being as experienced, or injured, or soapie stars ... in my world, if you're good - you're good - no ifs, ands, or buts - and there's nothing wrong with credit where credit is due and criticism where critism is due - thanks so much to those that have so far! - but the more that perth is prepared to defend substandard productions, then the more substandard productions they'll get, and the more we miss out on concentrating on the fantastic performers that perth does have to offer because of situations like "this did interrupt my enjoyment of the show as I couldn't stand the scenes that Maureen was in" that said (a lot i know!, stepping off pedestal now!) - i have huge faith in the guys from yellowglass and can't wait to see the show this weekend to form an educated opinion of what i see ... keep good classy theatre alive perth!

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 12:38 am

GRR! The point is that if

GRR! The point is that if Anthony Callea is in a musical, he SHOULD be able to act already. No excuses, guys. That's just pandering to the fame game. And yes, acting, dancing and singing at the same time IS hard, so that's why you hire talented people who can pull it off. If they can't, they should go back to training, or their day jobs- i.e. being SINGERS, not actors, as in the case of Callea and Wesbter. I am sick of celebrities being used as inspiration to see theatre in Perth. It's pathetic and it makes a joke of people who actually work their asses off to get into these kinds of shows. See the Cruisin' review thread for similar sentiments from other people: don't just hire celebs who can't pull it off. I'm seeing this show on the weekend, and I'm looking forward to it, but already feel disappointed that my expectations of the big names are being met. However, I look forward to forming my own opinion. Also, I apologise, a lot of this review is written in anger. I feel like the whole industry is just going down the tubes in this town. I won't have people pretending it's on the way up.

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 01:39 pm

Get with the script guys before you judge

If you people actually know the script you would know that Anthony's character Mark is supposed to be detached from life and only watching it through his camera rather than interacting. It is only at the end that he comes to the realisation of partaking in life rather than filming it, because of Angel's death. So Anthony's acting is being true to the character of observer and narrator.

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 02:08 pm

Interesting

Interesting that the two singled out for harsh critisism here were praised as 'Perfect' (Callea) and 'Extraordinary' (Webster) in the West Australian review yesterday.

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 02:57 pm

RENT Perth Production

It seems from previous posts when this Cast was originally announced there were already pre-concieved prejudices and yes everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but this is a new fresh production with a new cast and why keep comparing to what happened in years gone by. I have read very positive reviews from people who have been to this production in Bunbury & Perth and some actually went with the idea that they would not like it, but amazingly they were surprised that they did. I expected that the feeling's wouldn't change on this forum as a lot had already closed their minds before they saw the production, and Kate? please why would you think you would be given backlash from tweenies,another preconceived idea. For those of you who are interested I will post the Entertainment Reviewers critique from the "West Australian paper": _______________________________________________________ START "RENT NOT TO BE MISSED Musical: Rent Yellow Glass/Eventainment Regal Theatre Review: William Yeoman Asked to summarise the story of his future Pulitzer prize-winning rock musical in one sentence, Jonathan Larson said: "Rent is about a community celebrating life, in the face of death and AIDS, at the turn of the century." On January 25th, 1996, the night before Rent's first preview, Larson died from an aortic aneurysm. He was only 35. New WA production company Eventainment seems to have taken Larson's carpe diem message - in both an artistic and personal sense - to heart. This is the third major production this year after the enormously successful Hair and a witty, stylish adaptation of the Marriage of Fiagro. Judging by the strength of this production in virtually every department, there seems to be no stopping this company next year. Rent takes Puccini's opera La Boheme and transposes it to modern-day New York's East Village. Instead of tuberculosis raging through the bohemian population, its AIDS. The action takes place within the space of a year, beginning and ending on Christmas Eve, and follows the fortunes of young filmmaker Mark, whose girlfriend Maureen has left him for a woman, Joanne; the rock singer Roger, who falls in love with Mimi; and Collins, who meets and falls in love with a cross-dressing street drummer Angel. These last 4 are HIV positive. Complicating their lives in varying degrees is Benny, the bohemian turned property developer. The cast is a strong one. Anthony Callea is perfect as the somewhat detached Mark, the observer with the camera who cannot help but be caught up in life. Tim Campbell brings a stubborn meloncholy to Roger, while Jaya Henderson makes it quite explicit that Mimi is as unbalanced psychologically as she is physically. Nikki Webster as the fickle Maureen is extraordinary. Her Over the Moon is a real tour-de-force; by contrast, Joanne's strength of character is solidly delineated by Sharon Wisniewski. Shai Yammanee as Collins and Andrew Conaghan as Benny, both so good in Fiagro, again show their adaptness at strong characterisations. Ultimately, however its Shane Janek's doomed Angel that steals the show - a dazzling glitter-ball of energy and high camp. The ensemble is likewise excellent, there is not a weak link among them, and the band, led by music director Simon Halt, lends solid support throughout. Artistic director Chris Kabay has done a marvellous job with the production, playing with visual puns and Christian iconography in order to enrich what is an already powerful emotional experience. This is everything not just a musical, but an opera, should be. Don't miss it."" END: _____________________________________________________ It appears to me that people who are not "RENTHEADS" or in the fringe theatre business will go with an open mind for a night out to be entertained to see this production and absolutely love it, but it appears others who may be in the theatre or trying to get into theatre, seem upset when someone isn't wearing a certain coloured scarf. Why not compare the original production in New York to the film version, many changes I would imagine. There are so many production's of RENT going on all around the world at the moment and I hazzard they are not all unknowns playing the roles. This production is bringing people over from the East Coast to see it, so thats got to be a good thing for Perth Theatre wouldn't you think? I know this show would pack theatres on the East Coast there are many people hanging out to see it in Sydney and Melbourne so why not enjoy live theatre while you can in Perth. I guess I just don't understand why people would go to a show just to sit there and pick it to pieces,I go for the enjoyment.

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 03:03 pm

ok well were do i start

ok well were do i start Firstly the shows direction i thought was average it really didnt flow ...... went from song to song and at stages i found it very hard to figure out where they were and what was going on and i know the musical very well.... The celebs well what can i say anthony we all know can sing .... ACT NO... nikki tries so hard but clearly struggled to potray a homeless lesbian girl she looked very uncomfortable although vocally she was brilliant... SHANE aka Courtney was probably the most genius casting sure vocally in some of the songs he wasn't really strong but what we dont remember he is a male singing as a woman so in that respect i think he was fantastic.... tim was perfect for the part and rocked it really well.... one thing that gets on my nerves and really annoys me is they have used celebs to do musical theatre to sell tickets wise move if you want to make a quick buck but if you were to look through the programme the ackomplishments of all the chorus members JAYA and SHAI all have amazing shows performances and experience in musical theatre behing them and i think to put a celeb in just for there name is CRAP .... they seriously need to learn to act ... vocally the show was amazing ACTING wise the biggest flop ..... Mimi i thought was fantastic jaya was amazing and played the part so well in comparison to the rest .... standout performers would have to be JAYA SHAI SHARON and ANDREW ... none of the Celebs funny that ........ peace out

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 03:20 pm

Rent

I'm seeing this tommorow night. I've got VIP tickets, did anyone else meet the cast with VIP?

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 03:28 pm

Out of Work

Can I ask are you people all "Out of Work" theatre actors? this is a genuine question as there seems to be a pattern, tinged with a little bitterness.

DazzaBWed, 14 Nov 2007, 03:47 pm

LOL - fair question here

LOL - fair question here based on what I've read. I am an actor who was getting lots of work but started to resent the taxing schedule of touring - especially interanational tours. So I gave it up took a desk job (still working in the arts) and now do community theatre for the fun of it. I suppose I write reviews because I feel that constructive commentary helped me to grow and develop as a performer so much. If I sound bitter, I apologise, I don't feel bitter I assure you ;) Darren

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 03:58 pm

Dear Smile,I work in

Dear Smile, I work in Business Management.. Musical Theatre buffs will appreciate talented no-names and go to see theatre because they love it (me especially). Companies that put on musicals do not need to convince musical theatre buffs, like me, to attend shows. They DO, however, need to convince the regular joe blogs to come.... hence they use big-name draw cards to attract the crowds. By doing this, they get bums on seats... bums on seats pay for the venue, the staff to run the show, and also for the no-name actor's wages. I'm not saying that this is good for musical theatre, this is just the reality of the situation. ... if production companies don't attract large crowds by using draw cards, the no-mames wont be getting paid... simple as that. It is not 'pandering to the fame game', it's allowing no-name actors to get paid they money they deserve. The no-names HAVE to be people that the general public know... and thus are not always 100% musical theatre actors. For those who want to compare this production to the last yellow glass production and say 'but the last one sold out' look at the difference in venue size. (Regal seats 1074, Bakery Artrage seats 100). With the larger venue, the no-names will be getting paid more... Shows like these cost big $$$. Getting a whole heap of Unknown musical theatre actors might make a better show... but a show doesn't exist without an audience. Draw cards are needed. We as perth people need to promote musical theatre to the general public so that one day, the draw card might be the bloke next door.... Ps- I read Nikki's Biography... she's been acting since the age of 4 and in musical theatre since the age of 8. Grant Enjoy the show, it's great. Try to go in to the show with an open mind.. =)

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 04:03 pm

Nikki has a fractured foot

Dear Nallan Nikki has a fractured foot - I'd 'look very uncomfortable' too. ps- read my post above as to why draw cards (celebs) are used... it's just the reality of the situation. I'm sure you'll understand (even though we might not agree with it) Grant

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 04:56 pm

RENT

'I should tell you I should tell you!!' Like you I went to the production of RENT on the weekend. I travelled from Interstate and enjoyed it immensely, so much so that I will be returning for more. Other people I met at the production have since told me they have decided to buy more tickets as they enjoyed the production so much. The cast was wonderful. Shame you had your 'beer goggles' on and find the need to critise everyone. It was a stellar performance by everyone. Congratulations to everyone involved in the production. It is such a shame it will not be touring the East Coast or that a DVD is not being produced. :)

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 05:02 pm

I think the situation is

I think the situation is that there are many types of musical theatre audiences; eg there are those that love the artform and attend everything all the shows they possibly can, and want to be moved and forced to think about what they have seen. And there are those that just want an entertaining night out, hear some great songs and listen to talented people. People will expect different things depending on why they go to see a show; no one is right and no one is wrong. Personally, I totally disagree with the review that was in the West yesterday, but obviously we expect different things from a show. Contracting well known people is a good way to get the masses in, and to be able to make it a financially viable business. But the price you pay for doing that is the risk that some people will always see these well knowns as what they do off stage; they cant separate the character from the person and I dont think that you will ever get around this. And Ill admit that I am one of these people; it is not the companys fault, nor the performers, its just how I think. Its great for the arts scene in our city that people who dont usually attend will be encouraged to attend these wonderful shows and see our own amazing performers because there is a drawcard involved. I really do hope that they enjoy it and start to go to more shows in the future. But for me, 'well-knowns' giving what I believe were sub standard performances isnt why I invest in musical theatre. And I dont believe that makes me bitter, its just a different view.

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 05:09 pm

RENT

P.S I should also add, neither I nor any of my friends who attended the production are 'tweenies' as you implied. This is a must see production as The West Australian Newspaper wrote.

AstaWed, 14 Nov 2007, 08:44 pm

Well I was gone for too long obviously...

Wow!!! I didn't check this page for a few days and look whats happened. Just to reply to a few comments directed straight at me. Feel I should defend my honour and explain some of my comments a little more for the kids at home. 1. Firstly I did read the program but my friend took it home with her so I didn't have it with me when I wrote my review. Sorry I do normally try to use everyone's real names. I thought I did rather well remembering considering this. 2. The whole monkey bar thing. Mimi is a stripper so yeah I would have expected a bit more pole dancer moves or at least a hint of flexibility. You can do quite a bit without losing your breathe and losing vocal quality (as Devon and Rhoda both did in the last production.. but lets not start comparing here). Also I was in a show where I (and seven other girls) had to backflip in heavy can can skirts and in high heels so I would gladly take up the monkey bar challenge. Not saying I'm better than Jaya or anything like that just saying that just because she's in heels and on a stage doesn't mean you can't do anything in them. 3. I am not an out of work or retired show person. I am primarily a dancer but I do sing and act as well. I try to see a show a month so I can have a wide range of experiences and see what talent is out there. I do go for the enjoyment. I also write reviews for enjoyment too. 4. The whole tweenie thing was not a pre-concieved idea. It was a joke that obviously didn't transfer properly. It was in reference to last weeks episode of idol but don't worry about it now. I didn't mean anything by it. 5. Saying "ps-if you hated the end, then you're pretty much saying you hated the way they did it on broadway, because it was very similar..." what a load of crap. I'm sorry but whether or not it was the same as broadway or not. This is two seperate performances. I have never seen the broadway version and probably never will so how can I hate something I have never seen. It wasn't the way it was staged that I hated it was the position Mimi got herself into. She looked like her back was being broken in two. I suspect that this was only a one night thing as I noticed Nikki try to move the coats when she saw how uncomfortable Jaya looked. 5. The foot injury with Nikki... they're called understudies for a reason (yes I know they would never put an understudy in for someone like Nikki unless it was really serious). And it wasn't her movement on her foot I hated it was her performance as a whole in this character, except her singing which I thought was fantastic. I personally like Nikki. I have her album and the strawberry kisses and Under Southern Skies singles. I also really liked her in Hair, I didn't like her in this (kinda like how I love Hugh Jackman but hated him in Viva Laughlin- but lets not go off on tangents...ha) Anyhoos I'm gonna sign off again with a big Yippie and thanks for playing with Kate today. I love a good argument and folks you have all made my day. Kudos to the cast and best of luck for the rest of the season. Those who have seen it good on ya, those who haven't enjoy. Cheers Kate.

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 11:17 pm

it's my opinion, not a

it's my opinion, not a review. when you see it,perhaps you will like it. i didn't.i saw it in NYC and when chris and simon first put it on, and i just feel this version leaves a lot to be desired. that's all.

Walter PlingeWed, 14 Nov 2007, 11:39 pm

RENT.

RENT. I just got home from the Wednesday performance. Overall, this is a very good show. Entertaining, good cast, script, score etc etc. A few things bothered me as in all musicals...especially ones that find themselves in Perth. The girl who played Mimi, just a few pitch problems, i'd love to be your singing teacher. Also with Tim Campbell...he was a bit off. It was very lacking in direction...Chris still did a wonderful job but it seemed as though the "celebs" weren't quite sure of what they were doing. It's totally understandable...they're not really actors. I felt they could have dug deeper into the script and what was behind everything. Don't just go for the obvious and what's on top (ie; the lines) look for every hidden meaning and truth. So apart from all this, Simon did a great job with the band. Set was simple and effective. Standouts - Jared Newall and Mitchell Goode. Small parts, but even the smallest of parts can make the best performance. I found myself watching these 2 and some others with wide eyes and the main cast were doing their bit down the front of the stage. Everyone should see this. If not for the show, but for a learning experience. Seeing "non actors" working like this is wonderful. I learnt a lot about how others move and work on stage etc etc. Well done once again. Chookas for the rest of the season. SBL

RandomBoiThu, 15 Nov 2007, 01:05 pm

No Day But Today

Hello All,

Well, I went to see this production of Rent last night, and in true Kyle fashion, I am going to tell you all what I think. Like Kate, I will be ready for some back-lash on what I have to say - but at the end of the day, we all have our own opinions. I'm not saying that what I think is right, but it is what I think - agree or disagree to your hearts content.

Okay, so I was lucky enough to see the deal where you could get tickets for $20 each so my partner and I decided to go. I figure at $40 for a night's entertainment, even if it's bad it's worth it. Well, Rent was far from bad. Overall I thought the show was actually quite good. I think the feel of this production stayed true to what Rent is. The design, direction and choreography were all simplistic, but effective. This simplicty heightened the focus on the performance.

Individual performances were somewhat of a mixed bag. The clear stand outs were Shai Yammanee as Collins, Shane Jenek as Angel and Sharon Wisniewski as Joanne. (Please note that 2 of the stand outs are Perth home-growns!) I have never been quite as moved as I was when Yammanee sang the reprise for I'll Cover You - absolutely breathtaking! Jenek's Angel was so well characterised. One has to wonder though... where does he put it? Wisniewski sparkled as the sassy Joanne, bringing her own flavour to the role, and her vocals were fantastic. On the other end of the scale you had Jaya Henderson who, while clearly a talented performer, was not up to the role of Mimi. She didn't have the vocal control to perform Out Tonight and she looked uncomfortable attempting to create the sexy, strong persona of Mimi. Andrew Conaghan as Benny was also a slight let down. While the tone of Conoghan's vocals was quite beautiful, he simply wasn't as strong as the other principles and it was very noticeable when he would take a solo line.

Okay, now to the other celebrities... To be honest, they surprised me. Anthony Callea's Mark worked for me. No-one can question his vocal talents, but I also felt that his acting was okay. There were a few moments where I felt that the singing could have been more empassioned. I think that at times Callea sang the melody to the best of his ability without acting the meaning. I didn't mind this (although I do understand the people who are saying that just because he is new at this does not give him the excuse to be average when there are many extremely talented people out there - I'll give my perspective on that in a little bit) because I felt that it kind of worked for Mark's detached persona. I don't think he did it on purpose, but that doesn't change the fact that I felt that it worked. Tim Campbell blew me away with his Roger. He is extremely talented and created a very real character. His rendition of One Song, Glory brought my partner to tears! And then of course we have young Nikki Webster. I challenge anyone to say that this young lady is not talented - she clearly is! Her voice is strong and well controlled with good diction and a nice tone. The problem with Webster's Maureen was that I just didn't beleive the character. I don't think she quite understood who Maureen is. Her rolled shoulder stance and bent-in knees just oozed a lack of confidence - and lets be frank here - Maureen is about as confident as you get! And of course, performing opposite Wisniewski did her no favours - she simply didn't stand up to her partner's strength. I will say though - kudos to her for performing with a fractured foot. Very professional - Bravo!

Special mention must also go to Mrs. Cohen and Alexi Darling. (I would like to note that I can't say who played these roles as the only credits listed in the program are for the principle cast... Please change this in the future - I like to know who is playing what so that I can give credit where it is due.) These two performers really shone while on stage. A Capella singing is difficult and they took that challenge and succeeded wonderfully. While neither of these characters have much stage time, the performers gave it all they had and produced very real personas. Well done.

I felt that the direction was actually quite suited to the story. There were only a couple moments that I feel didn't work. During the song Rent Mark and Roger repeatedly faced each other and sang the chorus (such as it is) which worked the first time but became contrived very quickly. I also didn't like Mimi very obviously throwing her drugs on the floor in Roger's apartment. I've always felt that Mimi was very distressed at the concept of losing her heroin (as a drug addict would be) and that this act just seemed totally out of character. The only other moment of direction that didn't work for me was during the second act with Maureen confronting both Joanne and Mark while standing below them on the stairs. I just feel that the character of Maureen is too strong to let herself be put in such a weak position. She wouldn't take on these two people without having everything working to her advantage. Other than those three minor things, Chris Kabay has put together a highly effective piece of theatre - congratulations.

I thought that the lighting design was absolutely spectacular. The use of reds on the panels upstage was very dramatic and the light beams through the haze were highly effective. Unfortunately the cues were slow at times. Quite often a performer would begin to sing and not be lit until halfway through the line. Also, during the moment I mentioned earlier with Mark, Joanne and Maureen on the stairs Maureen was in darkness the entire time. I couldn't tell whether this was a fixed light (in which case it is the actors fault) or the follow-spot. I know that's being quite picky - but it stood out, sorry.

The band were extremely good. I always enjoy having the band on stage as I feel it brings them into the peroformance more and that the music becomes another character of the story. I believe this is why Larsen always wanted the band to be on stage for this show. I also felt that the arrangements for this production were very clever. Congratulations also to Musical Director Simon Holt for his outstanding work.

Some show-stopping moments that I would like to pick out are: Yammanee singing the reprise of I'll Cover You - as I've already said, this was one of the most moving performances I have EVER witnessed. Callea and Campbell's What You Own - the harmonics and energy created between these two was something very special. And not to be forgotten, the Ensemble. The ensemble vocals were absolutely stunning. Songs like Will I? and Seasons of Love made my jaw drop.

My final words are to do with the much debated concept of utilising out of state celebrities in these shows. The reality is that while we do have the talent base here to cast a show like Rent entirely with home-grown performers, these clebrities help to raise the profile of a show. The interest generated by having people like Callea, Campbell, Webster and Jenek as part of the production increase the awareness of musical theatre in the Perth community. This will lead to the growth and development of the performing arts industry here in Perth. Already with Rent people have travelled interstate to see the show because of the celebrity factor. These people have now also seen our homegrown talent perform and will be getting to know them and raising their profile. If you don't like the celebrities, well, that is your own issue, but please do not question Eventainment's initiative and/or integrity in getting them for these shows as they are building the performing arts industry for us here in Perth. For that, I say a big resounding THANK YOU!

That's all from me, break a leg for the remainder of your season

Kyle

Walter PlingeThu, 15 Nov 2007, 03:09 pm

Rent

I saw Rent last night too and find myself agreeing with most of Kyle’s views. On the whole I enjoyed it. I did think the final scene was a bit awkward, as some other posters have already mentioned. Mimi looked mighty unnaturally uncomfortable and I don’t think either she or Roger managed to quite convey the emotion of the moment. Anthony Callea’s vocals were superb and I think it was worthwhile having him in the show for that alone. I agree with Kyle in that while his acting wasn’t brilliant, it was OK, and whether deliberate or not, he managed to capture the detached and disillusioned essence of Mark. I think he deserves the benefit of the doubt though, and I’ll put his portrayal down to better than expected acting. Conversely, I thought Tim Campbell’s acting was very good (apart from the final scene where I don’t think anyone was particularly good), and his vocals were OK. He had a clear, strong voice but not a lot of control. I find it curious that a lot of previous posters seem to think that Nikki Webster is a pop starlet and nothing more. Despite her young age, she actually has a strong background in musical theatre. Again, I agree with Kyle in that while she showed she can sing and act, I don’t think she was quite right for the part of Maureen. She just couldn’t give the role the sass and fire it required, and she couldn’t really match it with her on stage partner, Joanne, who was played really well by Sharon Wisniewski. Shane Jenek was great. He did lose his breath a few times when singing, but that didn’t really detract from his overall performance. He captured the flamboyance and emotion of Angel really well. He was the standout performer for me. I also really liked Shai Yammanee in the role of Collins, and he and Shane Jenek were a very effective combination. Jaya Henderson fell a little bit short in her portrayal of Mimi, particularly vocally. Overall, I’m glad I made the effort to see Rent, and I’m not too fussed if Eventainment continues to import an outsider or two. They help to bring customers through the door and attract additional attention to local theatre, and in the case of Rent, on the whole I thought the imports did a pretty credible job.

Sean BThu, 15 Nov 2007, 09:16 pm

Same on broadway...

Can't comment on this production of Rent- being from Victoria. But Even Broadway uses the celeb draw card to pull fans to shows. Anyone that watches 'The Singing Bee' might be interested to know Joey Fatone was part of the Rent cast on Broadway and many other B'Way shows also use actors from TV etc that can pull a crowd. So it's not a just an aussie thing- if it pulls the crowd, it pulls the crowd. Don't forget entertaining is a business too. But in saying that- I do want to see what I paid for. Especially when forking out hundreds of dollars to see shows. Sean ____________________________________________________________ Currently working on: 'Locked In' a short play based on a real life experience For more details visit: www.freewebs.com/lazycreationsgroup

Walter PlingeFri, 16 Nov 2007, 08:28 am

I really wish I could have

I really wish I could have been in Perth to see this show. With so many friends in the cast and crew it is so important to give support to our fellow Perthites in the industry. I absolutely loved YGT's first version of this show and it would have been so interesting to see the differences with the same director and such a varied cast. Best of luck for the rest of the season and just a quick note in regards to celebs in music theatre. Currently on West End the majority of 'big' shows either have celebs or popular music/films rehashed as drawcards. From Julian Clary in Cabaret and Kelly Osbourne in Chicago through to Bad Girls (songs from Blondies back catalogue), Dirty Dancing, Mamma Mia and now Flashdance. That is not to mention the numerous reality television series using the winners as leading cast members in revivals. Furthermore, you all might be interested to hear that a 'pop' version of Rent has just opened with Denise Van Outen starring. Can't bring myself to see it somehow as I just don't feel that the essence of what Larson wanted to create can be adapted into pop music and contemporary issues. Cheers

Walter PlingeFri, 16 Nov 2007, 08:00 pm

I don't think it's fair to

I don't think it's fair to dismiss bad acting on a professional stage and say "it's okay, he's only new to this" or "She's still growing up". If an audience member pays for a ticket to their favourite show, and it's Rent, nothing will stop their dissapointment when they've paid to see a story unfold in front of them, and their actor can't perform and do the story justice! To be in a musical, you need to act, sing and dance. A triple threat. And if you aren't particularly good at one of those things, you need to get better, or face the backlash. I haven't seen the production... so I can't be particular... i'm just stating an opinion... I don't think an audience should feel sorry for actors either if they are somewhat out of their depth. They have paid to see this show. They should get their money's worth!!!

Walter PlingeFri, 16 Nov 2007, 08:01 pm

I saw the show last night,

I saw the show last night, 15/11 and was very impressed. After umm-ing and ahh-ing about whether to go see it because of the star-studded cast, I eventually bought tickets and went with an open mind. I am not a Nikki Webster fan, but I do think she is quite talented. I decided I wouldn't go thinking "err Nikki Webster" but in the end found myself thinking "why Nikki Webster?". While she does have an awesome voice and actually does keep acting while she's on stage, I just found her performance painful. I just felt if she wasn't Nikki Webster - if she was just a 20 year old blonde girl - she wouldn't have got that part. She wasn't suited to her partner and she just wasn't convincing in her role. I thought her "over the moon" was good, but "take me or leave me" was a bit of a let down. Similarly, when Mimi came to sing "out tonight" I was a bit confused as to why she was wearing jeans? Sure, it's winter, but isn't she a strip club dancer? Oh and when she's telling Roger how she has the best butt around? She's in trackies! How could he tell?! I loved Tim Campbell (though got a bit sick of his signature dance move - pretty much just leaning back). His voice seemed effortless at times and was so on the ball. I thought Anthony Callea was suitable in his role and his singing was quite strong. One thing i picked up...if they're such poor bohemians... why is he wearing new converses?? I had seen Sharon Wisniewski in Guys and Dolls, so it was great to see her in this part. Amazing voice and stage presence. Initially, I thought Shai Yammanee was pretty average. AND THEN he sang the reprise. AWESOME. Very impressed. And yes, Shane Jenek stole the show, but I'm pretty sure he went out there with that intention! but yes, where DID he put it? The ensemble were great as well. At one point, my friend and I were just watching one of the members as she played with her "dog" in her handbag. They were all so animated all the time. and "will i" gave me shivers! Just one final thing...as someone who hasn't seen or read the Broadway version, I was very confused about the scene that followed Angel's death. With the white sheet? Can someone explain what that was about? And that's my 5 cents (cos 2c doesn't exist anymore.) Enjoyable evening all round. There is a group putting on a version at the Bakery in December, I think it'd be interesting to see this show in such a small space.

Ben_DSat, 17 Nov 2007, 12:07 am

I just got back from

I just got back from seeing rent for the third time.. and the first two times I saw, didn't notice anything weird or awkward about the whole Mimi dying scene, so I made sure I paid extra attention tonight to see what you are all talking about..

But I found nothing. Why would she look 'comfortable'?? - she is almost at the point of death, I wouldn't think some paradise resort feeling would be necessary! Tim was very much worried and attentive to her, if it was done any further it would have looked as if he was trying to get into her pants! The scene is spot on, and the chemistry is definetly evident. But that is my opinion:)

This show is without doubt one of the most incredible things I have seen on stage..

Get in quick and see the show before it ends.. an inspirational two and a half hours!

~~BEN~~

Walter PlingeSat, 17 Nov 2007, 02:24 am

I don't think it's fair to...

Don't people on this site feel the need to actually see shows before criticising and developing theories? I have seen Rent and several times, so am feeling spectacularly well-qualified among most of the company here. There's no bad acting so there's no need for the whole 'discussion'. Read the West Australian's review. I'm sure it's more worthy of consideration and discussion than an uninformed blog style.

Walter PlingeSun, 18 Nov 2007, 11:53 am

I found Mimi's death a

I found Mimi's death a little humourous on the night I went. She was great when they brought her on and as she was saying goodbye and all that, then she sort of did this plop and her arm fell. Sort of like if you asked a 5 year old to pretend to die. It's just that it was so sudden - fall, head to one side, arm droop. Hard to describe it in words rather than show it, but i just felt it may have looked better if she slowed it down.

Walter PlingeSun, 18 Nov 2007, 02:50 pm

Fantastic.

Saw RENT on thurs night. Awesome. Vocally amazing.Amazing standout performances from all including the multitalented ensemble. After reading many reviews on this site...not just of RENT.. it seems to follow a very negative trend of petty and often bitchy posts and one can only wonder what makes these people so mean spirited. Musical theatre in WA needs positive promotion to grow the industry and create jobs for all these out of work experts. Do yourselves a favour.... promote the industry with positive encouragement and only substantiated constructive critisism then maybe you will get work and Perths small population will support and sustain the industry. There was much to admire in this production both from the homegrown talent and the STARS, little to fault and it was a very enjoyable night, congrats to all.

Erin CSun, 18 Nov 2007, 05:29 pm

sorry...

sorry i dont mean to jump on your toes but when he says "larson would not be happy" he means Jonothan (sp?) Larson...writer and composer of the show. (He died due to heart problems just before previews of Rent started on B'way.....if i remember correctly...) I like what you're saying though

Walter PlingeMon, 19 Nov 2007, 03:09 pm

Personally I didn't think

Personally I didn't think you were one of the ones who sound bitter. The ones who say something is bad (or worse) without any explanation whatsoever are 'a little suspect' though, as are those who have commented and missed the point of the characters and situations. That's not the sort of constructive commentary you mention as your aim. I did want to point out to you that on the night you went, the mikes dropped out at times, including for Maureen's performance. Nikki's 'Over The Moon' was amazing through a functioning mike. Maybe you realised that, but just in case you didn't...

DazzaBMon, 19 Nov 2007, 03:34 pm

The Joy of the Microphone

Hey Marcie, I most certainly do know what you mean re: microphones dropping out - I have experienced that more than a few times in my travels. To be honest, I've been thinking an lot about Nikki's performance as Maureen. I've REALLY been trying to detach from my preconceived ideas of her as a performer - to the point that I even went and saw the show again last Wednesday night (cause I could get a ticket for $20) and I have to say that I felt a lot better about her in the role. I have to agree with what a few people have said about her characterisation - she just didn't do it for me in the role of Maureen, I didn't get that over-confident, extroverted, in-your-face quality from her that I would want to see in the character - but her vocals were outstanding. 'Over the Moon' was extremely well performed. And, I disagree with some people, I think 'Take Me or Leave Me' was also really well performed. I felt her and Sharon complimented each other well and the song was one of the high points for me this time around. Anyways, nuff said for the moment Darren

DazzaBMon, 19 Nov 2007, 04:10 pm

The White Sheet Scene

Hi CassieV, I can see how this scene would be really confusing! Firstly, a little of your confusion could come from the fact that this scene doesn't FOLLOW Angel's death, it actually PRECEEDS it. Anyway, I just did a quick search on Wikipedia and this is what they say about it in the synopsis: "The scene turns to a bed containing all the couples, with the implication that they are all having sex, which quickly transforms into a frustrating and awkward situation for all of them. For Collins and Angel, at this point, the bed turns from a place for sexual contact to a place where Angel becomes bedridden and dies. ("Contact"). " For me personally (and I think this will be different for most people as this scene is very abstract) this scene is about passion and intensity in the face of death. I think it's all about one of the main themes Larson was trying to convey with his work - that we need to live. I have the Rent book (which is a collection of interviews with many people who were invovled with the conception, creation and production of this show - including Larson) and Larson explains that his show is not about death and mourning, but about life and celebration. He was surrounded by friends who had AIDS and he attended many Life Support meetings while he was working on this show. He even said himself - Rent is about celebrating life! (Incidentally, it is for this reason that Mimi didn't die at the end) The 'Contact' scene shows another side of the whole celebrating life message. Angel was dying - they knew that - so I think the song represents the raw passion shared by Collins and Angel in the lead up to his death in an effort to live life as much as possible while they still could. That's my interpretation anyway. Any thoughts from others?? Darren

Walter PlingeMon, 19 Nov 2007, 07:18 pm

Don't stop - it's good to

Don't stop - it's good to read unbiased and constructive articulated stuff. I knew you'd know about mikes, but just wanted to say how different it was that Wednesday night. Anthony's dropped out at some crucial times too. For various reasons I've seen it a number of times. After I posted I wished I'd suggested you see it again, so I'm glad you did. Did you change your mind about any of the rest? I saw it early on and feel that Tim Campbell has improved both in singing (especially the singing) and creation of a character. I think the music is stunning and I'm going to see it again too. It's sad to feel that others aren't prepared to have open minds about this, to the extent there are apparently no blonde lesbians. Last night Anthony in What You Own and Hallowe'en moved me to tears and Shai is just wonderful; Collins is such a good role and he makes the most of it. The ensemble is superb. I love that it's been done in a more conventionally musical style than the original. I know saying that is living dangerously so will not go on to explain. I'm still not sure about the 'sheet'.

Neville TalbotFri, 23 Nov 2007, 01:29 pm

No day like today

Unfortunately I need to head down south very soon and don't have time to write the full review I want (yet). Well actually, there is nothing unfortunate about getting away... But I think it important to tell those that might be waiting for an excuse to get there. I saw the show last night (Thurs 22/11) and my overall impression was that this was simply excellent. It's run ends this weekend, so get in there and see it. More depth coming later, but- Vocally, this is about the strongest overall cast I have seen in a show in Perth. Pro or am. Very very few issues, and those of the nature of live performance- this is both imports and locals. Shai Yamanee- this man is a star. This was a performance of the absolute highest order. Rich and powerful and highly-controlled sound- throughout the performance. and the delivery of his character was almost flawless. I add 'almost' because I am sure there may have been something I missed. For me it was simply breathtaking. and yes- I cried bitterly in 'the spot'- but it began during Without You. The image of two people completely in love dealing with one's death was almost overwhelming during this song. When Shai sang the opening words of I'll Cover You I almost sobbed. I am actually lost for words to explain the impact this scene had on me. Get to see him Perthies, cos a player of his quality will not be here for too long methinks. I also thought that Sharon Wisniewski demonstrated an extraordinary voice in the role of Joanne. Some may remember my concerns about her voice fitting the part she was cast in in Guys and Dolls last year . Well- this was her part! My god- I could listen to that voice in full flight again and again. and again! Very confident and professional performance. Jared Newall in his couple of small roles demonstrated completely the axim that there is no such thing as a small role! His christmas jingles man (I think mentioned above) plus the waiter in the final scene of act one were well conceived and prepared, and delivered confidently. His was the first voice in Will I also, demonstrating he also has a beautiful vocal sound that will only improve with age and training. Of the imports I was impressed most by Tim Campbell, who I am sorry to say (to him!) really suprised me by how good he was. Good vocally, and good characterisation. Disagreeing with those above- I thought Callea was fine, and his voice was superb (and I have to tell you that I am/was not a Callea or Idol fan- at all). Nikki showed an awesome voice, but I'm not sure she was right for Maureen. and Shane was great- more detail later on all these! The band were awesome. Really clean and tight sound. The fact we hear so little about them is probably the best sign of how good they were. and the overall sound was almost flawless throughout the night. My wife and I were discussing the fact that last night is the first time EVER we have been in or watching a show at the Regal and the sound wasn't a source of bitter disappointment. Kudoes to mr Alan D Thompson. (just guessing, but did Eventainment actually spend some money and give the sound crew the actual gear they needed to do this properly- cos it sounded like it) Overall my only disappointment with the night was the bizarrely empty audience. I cannot believe that a show this good, with the reviews it had (West Australian), has apparently not filled the hall once. This is a travesty. Perhaps when us perthies are complaining yet again about a show not coming here, or about a talented local heading east, or about a company bringing easties in to play, or about there being no paid theatre work in this town- we can look at the Eventainment/Yellow Glass experience and realise it's mostly our own fault. I have much more to say, including theories on the audience probs (I cannot help but think that with the entire cast being paid, this show must be losing money, and probably not a small amount!), and more detail about the rest of the cast. But my wife wants me to get off my butt and get ready to go, and pregnant women must be obeyed! :-) Massive congrats to everyone in band, cast and crew- and especially the awesome creative team. More next week sometime (too much- too late?!) Neville It's the simple things stupid...

← Back to Theatre Reviews