Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Fleeting treats

Sat, 22 Sept 2007, 12:48 pm
Gordon the Optom7 posts in thread
Fleeting Treats’ has its final show at the Playlovers Theatre in Draper Street, Floreat on Saturday 22nd September at 7.30pm.

These ‘treats’ are a series of three short plays the first being:-

Indian Summer         Two young girls are running a London railway station café (good set). Laura (Jayma Knudson) who is fed up with the losers that come into the café wishes to travel and to see the world, especially India. Her friend Steph (Kyla Jones) tells her to seize the day and just do it! The customers relate the waitresses their life’s problems. The two waitresses and the half dozen patrons are played by the two actors. There is a complex mix of characters, emotions and accents required, and they both carry it off very well – especially Kyla who is making her stage debut. Good direction by Dannielle Ashton.

Fully installed            A young couple, Wayne (Brendon Fallon) and Kate (Dannielle Ashton) are typical of young parents. Worn out and getting into a monotonous rut. Then they visit the local art gallery where Wayne becomes fascinated – obsessed – with a living sculpture (Rae Boulton). Who is she? What will happen?

The actors proved themselves in the following play, but seemed under rehearsed in this.

Starkers          Rachel (Colette Doherty) is looking for a ‘different’ birthday present for her husband, something that he will really appreciate and may even give their private life a bit of a kick. She commissions an artist (Kerry Goode) to do a charcoal of her, topless. During the sitting, practically half the village comes through the house. Will the painting have the desired effect? The acting was generally very good and Muzza (Michael Limb) had especially good delivery and lifted the play.

The greatly respected WAAPA guru, Geoff Gibbs, said that ‘Julia Jarel's stories are humorous exposes of the foibles of suburbia’. Jarel wrote ‘Fully installed’ and ‘Starkers’, both of which I have seen before. The latter play was almost there, although a fair amount of the humour was lost. I know that it is unfair to compare the professional versions that I saw at the Blue Room in Feb 2005 with a community theatre show, but there really was no comparison.

Now, oh dear!! Comes the bad bit.

Because the first two plays are divided into several episodes, it is essential to ensure that the pace of the show doesn’t lag. In ‘Indian Summer’ when one customer left and the next was entering a long delay was experienced and by fading the lights to half brightness, probably to suggest passage of time, this made the entire punchy comedy tempo disappear. The episodes were very different and not linked by a particular theme, so whilst interesting and well presented became very bitty. In the second play, similarly, a fade to black at the end of each scene really broke the whole thing up, especially as the fade was to facilitate unnecessary scene changes.

It is demanding to ask an actor to appear semi or totally naked, but if they accept the challenge, then they must get in the mood of the piece. The Starkers wife spent about 20 minutes with her back to the audience delivering her lines to the backcloth. Clothed, or unclothed, this makes the audience frustrated; this may work well in a suspense where the villain is made to be mysterious, but in a comedy like ‘Starkers’ one just got annoyed. Just say to yourself, ‘Oh blow! And let it all hang out!’

The lighting and sound designs were good, but the operation was some of the worst that I have ever experienced. Every play had lights tweaked up and down whilst the actors were in full flow. One play required a seated actor to be picked out by a spotlight, I don’t know if the lighting console wasn’t labelled, but two lights dimmed and came back up, and then there was a total blackout before the correct lamp was found.

The sound had three or four split-second bursts of stray noise, when no effects were even required in the performance. A white light was left on in the wings, so that a fade to black still allowed us to see the ASM, in a very light outfit (wear black and be invisible!) wander on and cover a prop with a black cloth – this routine, carried out about ten times, became the biggest laugh of the night. By simply leaving that area of the stage unlit the audience will ‘not see it’ and the whole pace of the episode will be better. The same ASM should not go onto the stage until he knows precisely where he is going, it is not a time to become stagestruck and to wander aimlessly around. Then there was the person who took more than half a dozen flash photos from around the auditorium during each of the shows – where was the house manager?

I am glad that I was in a good mood last night, as this review could have been worse. To enter the competition these play need to be tidied up. Sorry, but I am very disappointed, Playlovers normally set the standard.

Thread (7 posts)

Gordon the OptomSat, 22 Sept 2007, 12:48 pm
Fleeting Treats’ has its final show at the Playlovers Theatre in Draper Street, Floreat on Saturday 22nd September at 7.30pm.

These ‘treats’ are a series of three short plays the first being:-

Indian Summer         Two young girls are running a London railway station café (good set). Laura (Jayma Knudson) who is fed up with the losers that come into the café wishes to travel and to see the world, especially India. Her friend Steph (Kyla Jones) tells her to seize the day and just do it! The customers relate the waitresses their life’s problems. The two waitresses and the half dozen patrons are played by the two actors. There is a complex mix of characters, emotions and accents required, and they both carry it off very well – especially Kyla who is making her stage debut. Good direction by Dannielle Ashton.

Fully installed            A young couple, Wayne (Brendon Fallon) and Kate (Dannielle Ashton) are typical of young parents. Worn out and getting into a monotonous rut. Then they visit the local art gallery where Wayne becomes fascinated – obsessed – with a living sculpture (Rae Boulton). Who is she? What will happen?

The actors proved themselves in the following play, but seemed under rehearsed in this.

Starkers          Rachel (Colette Doherty) is looking for a ‘different’ birthday present for her husband, something that he will really appreciate and may even give their private life a bit of a kick. She commissions an artist (Kerry Goode) to do a charcoal of her, topless. During the sitting, practically half the village comes through the house. Will the painting have the desired effect? The acting was generally very good and Muzza (Michael Limb) had especially good delivery and lifted the play.

The greatly respected WAAPA guru, Geoff Gibbs, said that ‘Julia Jarel's stories are humorous exposes of the foibles of suburbia’. Jarel wrote ‘Fully installed’ and ‘Starkers’, both of which I have seen before. The latter play was almost there, although a fair amount of the humour was lost. I know that it is unfair to compare the professional versions that I saw at the Blue Room in Feb 2005 with a community theatre show, but there really was no comparison.

Now, oh dear!! Comes the bad bit.

Because the first two plays are divided into several episodes, it is essential to ensure that the pace of the show doesn’t lag. In ‘Indian Summer’ when one customer left and the next was entering a long delay was experienced and by fading the lights to half brightness, probably to suggest passage of time, this made the entire punchy comedy tempo disappear. The episodes were very different and not linked by a particular theme, so whilst interesting and well presented became very bitty. In the second play, similarly, a fade to black at the end of each scene really broke the whole thing up, especially as the fade was to facilitate unnecessary scene changes.

It is demanding to ask an actor to appear semi or totally naked, but if they accept the challenge, then they must get in the mood of the piece. The Starkers wife spent about 20 minutes with her back to the audience delivering her lines to the backcloth. Clothed, or unclothed, this makes the audience frustrated; this may work well in a suspense where the villain is made to be mysterious, but in a comedy like ‘Starkers’ one just got annoyed. Just say to yourself, ‘Oh blow! And let it all hang out!’

The lighting and sound designs were good, but the operation was some of the worst that I have ever experienced. Every play had lights tweaked up and down whilst the actors were in full flow. One play required a seated actor to be picked out by a spotlight, I don’t know if the lighting console wasn’t labelled, but two lights dimmed and came back up, and then there was a total blackout before the correct lamp was found.

The sound had three or four split-second bursts of stray noise, when no effects were even required in the performance. A white light was left on in the wings, so that a fade to black still allowed us to see the ASM, in a very light outfit (wear black and be invisible!) wander on and cover a prop with a black cloth – this routine, carried out about ten times, became the biggest laugh of the night. By simply leaving that area of the stage unlit the audience will ‘not see it’ and the whole pace of the episode will be better. The same ASM should not go onto the stage until he knows precisely where he is going, it is not a time to become stagestruck and to wander aimlessly around. Then there was the person who took more than half a dozen flash photos from around the auditorium during each of the shows – where was the house manager?

I am glad that I was in a good mood last night, as this review could have been worse. To enter the competition these play need to be tidied up. Sorry, but I am very disappointed, Playlovers normally set the standard.

Daniel KershawSun, 23 Sept 2007, 04:25 pm

I absolutely agree with

I absolutely agree with everything Gordon said. I thought Fully Installed was terrible and I don't use that word lightly. Starkers had some redeeming qualities. Some. However, I did enjoy Indian Summer. Gordon said, when one customer left and the next was entering a long delay was experienced and by fading the lights to half brightness, probably to suggest passage of time, this made the entire punchy comedy tempo disappear. The episodes were very different and not linked by a particular theme, so whilst interesting and well presented became very bitty. - this is almost the exact thing I told the director when I saw the tech run. I also had an issue with the set, but overall the production would be one of the better One Acts I've seen this year.
Walter PlingeSun, 23 Sept 2007, 11:14 pm

nudity

Gordon also says: It is demanding to ask an actor to appear semi or totally naked, but if they accept the challenge, then they must get in the mood of the piece. The Starkers wife spent about 20 minutes with her back to the audiencei delivering her lines to the backcloth. Clothed, or unclothed, this makes the audiencei frustrated; this may work well in a suspense where the villain is made to be mysterious, but in a comedy like ‘Starkers’ one just got annoyed. Just say to yourself, ‘Oh blow! And let it all hang out!’ Be fair Gordon... i cant think of any shows where an actor just has to stand there nude and 'let it all hang out'. It takes alot of bravery for her to get up there in the first place. I enjoyed the plays on the whole, but not up to the usual standard I am afraid. J F
Gordon the OptomMon, 24 Sept 2007, 09:47 am

choosing your part

I agree fully with you Jennifer, that simply getting onto a stage can be a nightmare for performers, however it is their decision whether to accept or refuse the parts they are offered and the conditions attached. As said previously, ‘should they accept the challenge’ then they must get on with it, and give the part their all.
 
I know actors who would feel more comfortable appearing in the nude than having to sing, dance or recite poetry.
 
You mentioned that you cannot think of any show in which the actors have ‘let it all hang out’ – how about: -
Loveplay’ now showing at PICA, has a male totally nude,
Romeo and Juliet’ at the Marloo had an appropriate, subtle and sensitive topless.
Zen’s red mouth’ had a hilarious topless song about ‘gratuitous nudity’ and it wasn’t considered gratuitous.
Reprehensible’ had an uproariously funny couple, starkers.
 
My main point was not the nudity, but that actors should only choose the parts with which they feel comfortable, or leave it to others.
Walter PlingeMon, 24 Sept 2007, 03:24 pm

I would just like to throw

I would just like to throw into the mix, that instead of questioning the actors comfort and/or discomfort of being nude, we should perhaps ask of the directors intention for this positioning?
Walter PlingeMon, 24 Sept 2007, 09:07 pm

nude offerings

I saw the plays on Saturday night, I had no problem with the directors staging. The positioning of the Artists model worked for me. It allowed all the other actors to face the front and throw the sideways glance that works in comedy, and for red blooded men like me in row D, it kept us focused, for the illicit sneaky peeky.. and this is what some of the characters, notably Muzza, ( excellent comedic performance) played to. I dislike " bad nudity" I agree with Gordon that if you are going to flaunt it then get it out there. I don't think the flaunting it was crucial to this play. I have seen a performance of Shirley Valentine wrecked by a 3 second flash in the half light, which made a lie out of Shirley's speech about being "out there and proud of her stretch marks" This is the nudity I dislike, especially when you read the play and a costume is described for that particular scene! I went and saw " Bug" (good theatre) it has nudity that fits the mood and scenario, it wasn't out of place, it wasn't hidden, it was natural and in context. On the night I thought Starkers was the best of the three plays. The first " Indian Summer" while well acted with a good set didn't appeal to me. It may have been that most of the monologues seemed to follow the " All men are bastards" theory/ mantra of Feminist literature. That is not to detract from the great performances of the two actors, the characters were well defined and I enjoyed the actors craft while not thinking much of the play, ( if that makes sense) I do agree that there were many unnecessary set changes in "Fully Installed" Just turn the light out! It is far less distracting than having someone running on and off with a sheet, and the audience running a book on "how much of the prop got covered this time" Let the model re-arrange the prop as a natural part of her " installation performance" Time isn't a problem with this show so let it flow. All in all, not a bad night, I will agree that this season hasn't set a new bench mark for Play lovers and the tech side was strangely wonky. But the greatest crime for me was that when I and my partner came out for intermission. The Bar had a closed until after the performance sign up! Unfair Play ladies and gentlemen. Sorry, no fancy quotes or a photo, just a real name. Bruce
danni_skyeTue, 25 Sept 2007, 11:38 am

Cheers...

Thanks for the constructive feedback guys... Also Congrats to Jayma and Kyla, for taking out an award at Bunbury...The many rehearsals and hard work paid off guys...very proud of you!!!
← Back to Theatre Reviews