Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Grease in the Burbs

Fri, 14 Sept 2007, 11:05 am
RandomBoi30 posts in thread

I made the trek down to the burbs last night to see a production of Grease that was put on by Rockingham Theatre Company. Well, what can I say... Grease is one of my favourite shows. I first saw the movie when I was eleven years of age and I have loved it ever since. I've also seen the stage show several times and I understand that it is much different from the movie, however, what I saw last night was highly disappointing!

The show began in near darkness, with the opening number Grease is the Word being performed with only two follow-spots that chased around the stage and prevented the audience from being able to see any of the performers' faces. Even a low level wash here would have lifted the scene immensely. The next thing I noticed was that, while the Pink Ladies looked about the right age, three of the T-Birds appeared to be in their 30's, acting opposite a Danny who was clearly under the age of 20! The directors (Beverley and David Heckingbottom) need to think carefully about casting in the future - this was simply embarassing for the actors performing the show as it made the entire story completely unbelievable!

The show proceeded to disappoint from there. While the chorale voice was quite strong, many of the soloists were clearly not ready for such a task. Kudos to Danny, Sandy, Rizzo, and Jan & Roger who held their songs together quite well. (In particular, to the young man who played Roger - you have a compelling voice with heaps of potential - I could tell that you were nervous, but you did well. Keep it up!) I would have liked to see Sandy and Rizzo give more of their own interpretation when performing though. These two girls are clearly quite talented and capable of making a song their own, but I feel the direction was to emulate those performances featured in the movie. Doody's solo Magic Changes was very flat in places and undermined the harmony created by the chorale voice. A truly painful performance! Kenicke's interpretation of Grease Lighting was completely out of time and had a severe lack of energy. I could hardly hear Marty's voice when she sang Freddy My Love - although this could be the fault of the sound technician. Possibly the worst sung performance however came from the actor playing Vince Fontayne and the Guardian Angel in Beauty School Drop Out. Rob Walker attempted to achieve things that he simply does not have the voice for - please, learn your limitations!

The choreography was simplistic and poorly executed. Grease has some very innovative numbers and offers the chance to create choreo that is equally innovative. I saw a simpler version of the same old routines one sees everywhere for these numbers. Please, please, please learn to take a chance with your choreo - the pay-off will be enormous! Also, why repeat the exact same routine when you present a number for a second (and in thsi case third) time? The choreo for We Go Together was not all that good to begin with; however, when I saw it for the third time I had to question the experience of the choreographer. Surely a woman who has been teaching dance for as long as Beverley Heckingbottom could have come up with a different routine - particularly considering there were far more cast members on stage the second and third time this particular number was staged.

As far as direction goes, I was astounded to learn that this show had been rehearsing since late April! I initially thought that the directors had not had enough time to get things right. Apparently I was wrong. There was a clear attempt to re-create the movie with many characters, which I feel is just lazy; the bulk of the blocking seemed to have no point other than the fact that a certain character had not moved in a while; and of course the creative casting truly undermined the entire production. My other concern regarding direction was the decision to include a 17-and-a-half minute medley of every single song from the show as the finale. We (the audience) had just seen the show, we did not need a reminder! This was a highly poor moment of direction that simply sent me spiralling into fits of insane boredom. Why?

I also have to call into question the strange choice of using pre-recorded music as opposed to a live band; a decision I must say I did not understand at all. Grease is all about the energy, which I'm sure you will agree is created by the music. The use of pre-recorded music caused the energy levels of the show to flatline! This lack of energy was then exacerbated by the bored looks on the faces of most of the performers. I question why most of these young people were on stage when they clearly were not enjoying themsleves.

A few positives:

The costumes were of a relatively high standard. Kudos to Sandy - you looked gorgeous in your tight number at the end - Olivia would be proud!

The sets were effective although at times overused. Just because you have steps on stage does not mean someone has to climb them in every scene!

Sonny had a fun, youthful energy (although was clearly at least 10 years older than Danny) that was communicated well to the audience.

Danny was clearly a cut above the rest. Hold onto him - he is the type of performer you want in your company. Good voice (although his microphone levels were too low for the bulk of the show), extremely strong dance and a convinving interpretation of the character. And perhaps most important of all - energetic throughout the entire performance!

Jan had something very special about her. She clearly loved performing this show and I hope I see her again in something soon. She is a true talent - keep hold of her as well!

At this point I would like to voice a quote I heard a few years back - "Just because it's community theatre, doesn't give it the excuse to be crap." I have seen many community shows (including other shows presented by Rockingham Theatre Company) that have been of a very pleasing standard. In fact, at times I have seen community shows that I feel rival those on the West End and Broadway! Please, please, please do not fall into the trap of "near enough is good enough, we're only a community show" as this cheapens the rest of the community theatre being presented around the traps.

I hope Rockingham Theatre Company look forwards from this production and return to their previous higher standards of performance. I did not enjoy Grease at all!

Thread (30 posts)

RandomBoiFri, 14 Sept 2007, 11:05 am

I made the trek down to the burbs last night to see a production of Grease that was put on by Rockingham Theatre Company. Well, what can I say... Grease is one of my favourite shows. I first saw the movie when I was eleven years of age and I have loved it ever since. I've also seen the stage show several times and I understand that it is much different from the movie, however, what I saw last night was highly disappointing!

The show began in near darkness, with the opening number Grease is the Word being performed with only two follow-spots that chased around the stage and prevented the audience from being able to see any of the performers' faces. Even a low level wash here would have lifted the scene immensely. The next thing I noticed was that, while the Pink Ladies looked about the right age, three of the T-Birds appeared to be in their 30's, acting opposite a Danny who was clearly under the age of 20! The directors (Beverley and David Heckingbottom) need to think carefully about casting in the future - this was simply embarassing for the actors performing the show as it made the entire story completely unbelievable!

The show proceeded to disappoint from there. While the chorale voice was quite strong, many of the soloists were clearly not ready for such a task. Kudos to Danny, Sandy, Rizzo, and Jan & Roger who held their songs together quite well. (In particular, to the young man who played Roger - you have a compelling voice with heaps of potential - I could tell that you were nervous, but you did well. Keep it up!) I would have liked to see Sandy and Rizzo give more of their own interpretation when performing though. These two girls are clearly quite talented and capable of making a song their own, but I feel the direction was to emulate those performances featured in the movie. Doody's solo Magic Changes was very flat in places and undermined the harmony created by the chorale voice. A truly painful performance! Kenicke's interpretation of Grease Lighting was completely out of time and had a severe lack of energy. I could hardly hear Marty's voice when she sang Freddy My Love - although this could be the fault of the sound technician. Possibly the worst sung performance however came from the actor playing Vince Fontayne and the Guardian Angel in Beauty School Drop Out. Rob Walker attempted to achieve things that he simply does not have the voice for - please, learn your limitations!

The choreography was simplistic and poorly executed. Grease has some very innovative numbers and offers the chance to create choreo that is equally innovative. I saw a simpler version of the same old routines one sees everywhere for these numbers. Please, please, please learn to take a chance with your choreo - the pay-off will be enormous! Also, why repeat the exact same routine when you present a number for a second (and in thsi case third) time? The choreo for We Go Together was not all that good to begin with; however, when I saw it for the third time I had to question the experience of the choreographer. Surely a woman who has been teaching dance for as long as Beverley Heckingbottom could have come up with a different routine - particularly considering there were far more cast members on stage the second and third time this particular number was staged.

As far as direction goes, I was astounded to learn that this show had been rehearsing since late April! I initially thought that the directors had not had enough time to get things right. Apparently I was wrong. There was a clear attempt to re-create the movie with many characters, which I feel is just lazy; the bulk of the blocking seemed to have no point other than the fact that a certain character had not moved in a while; and of course the creative casting truly undermined the entire production. My other concern regarding direction was the decision to include a 17-and-a-half minute medley of every single song from the show as the finale. We (the audience) had just seen the show, we did not need a reminder! This was a highly poor moment of direction that simply sent me spiralling into fits of insane boredom. Why?

I also have to call into question the strange choice of using pre-recorded music as opposed to a live band; a decision I must say I did not understand at all. Grease is all about the energy, which I'm sure you will agree is created by the music. The use of pre-recorded music caused the energy levels of the show to flatline! This lack of energy was then exacerbated by the bored looks on the faces of most of the performers. I question why most of these young people were on stage when they clearly were not enjoying themsleves.

A few positives:

The costumes were of a relatively high standard. Kudos to Sandy - you looked gorgeous in your tight number at the end - Olivia would be proud!

The sets were effective although at times overused. Just because you have steps on stage does not mean someone has to climb them in every scene!

Sonny had a fun, youthful energy (although was clearly at least 10 years older than Danny) that was communicated well to the audience.

Danny was clearly a cut above the rest. Hold onto him - he is the type of performer you want in your company. Good voice (although his microphone levels were too low for the bulk of the show), extremely strong dance and a convinving interpretation of the character. And perhaps most important of all - energetic throughout the entire performance!

Jan had something very special about her. She clearly loved performing this show and I hope I see her again in something soon. She is a true talent - keep hold of her as well!

At this point I would like to voice a quote I heard a few years back - "Just because it's community theatre, doesn't give it the excuse to be crap." I have seen many community shows (including other shows presented by Rockingham Theatre Company) that have been of a very pleasing standard. In fact, at times I have seen community shows that I feel rival those on the West End and Broadway! Please, please, please do not fall into the trap of "near enough is good enough, we're only a community show" as this cheapens the rest of the community theatre being presented around the traps.

I hope Rockingham Theatre Company look forwards from this production and return to their previous higher standards of performance. I did not enjoy Grease at all!

DazzaBFri, 14 Sept 2007, 11:42 am

Harsh! But Fair!

WOW, what a full on review! Be aware - negative reviews usually spurn insane amounts of lash-back!! Anyway... I saw the show last night as well, and yeah, it was pretty dodge - but fair is fair, they have a tiny venue and Grease is such a big production. Snaps to you for mentioning the positives as well as the negatives though hey :) I agree - Danny and Jan were excellent! As were Rizzo, Sandy and Sonny. And yes - the 17 minutes of deja-vu at the end was really painful! I couldn't beleive they actually did that! WTF??
Walter PlingeFri, 14 Sept 2007, 12:04 pm

The 17-minute medley

The 17-minute medley probably stems from the same thing done in the professional touring production that came to Perth in 1998 with Danni Minogue and Craig McLachlan
RandomBoiFri, 14 Sept 2007, 12:46 pm

A Director's Choice

Thank you Gary for clarifying the origin of the medley. The 1998 season is one particular production of Grease I missed as I was unable to attend due to other commitments.

The reasoning for the existence of this medley however brings me back to the point I made in my intitial post about re-creating moments from the movie. In this case the directors have re-created a moment form another stage production. I do not know how well the medley worked in the 1998 production, but I feel that it did not work in this production - mainly due to the complete lack of energy exhibited by the bulk of the cast at this point. And personally, I fail to see the logic in repeating the entire score in truncated form at the end of the show - I don't think that I would have liked it even if it had been energetic and well performed. Perhaps that's just me though.

I would also like to note that, if in fact this medley was featured in the stage script, the director has the right to choose to change things in the script. Please note that the stage script for Grease DOES NOT include the song Hopelessly Devoted to You which was written specifically for the movie to show off Olivia Newton-John's voice. Also, the stage-play uses the song Stranded at the Drive in Movie as opposed to Sandy as featured in the movie. The director made the choice to change the script here - why not for the medley?

Walter PlingeSat, 15 Sept 2007, 08:24 am

not a director's choice

I would like to point out that it is not a director's choice to alter any script. Particularly in what is known as "grand" scale(?)works (something like that - anyone able to clarify the term?) (musicals and the like). The performing rights contracts are very clear about this. No changes to the "book", lyrics or music can be made without permission. And for a work like West Side Story (for eg) they even go so far as to specify that the original choreography must be used (or they did when I directed it in the 1990s- very difficult without professional dancers). It is important to be careful of "adapting" anything.
Walter PlingeSat, 15 Sept 2007, 09:18 am

The medley in the 1998

The medley in the 1998 stage version seemed like overkill back then, too.
Walter PlingeSat, 15 Sept 2007, 09:59 am

overkill

The medley drove me insane !! But i didnt mind the show. Good effort. The dances were a little dissapointing i thought, especially since they have been rehearsing for so long
Walter PlingeSat, 15 Sept 2007, 04:51 pm

when you are given that

when you are given that kinda of cast after paying the money the show cost you need to work with that. you cant waste that kinda of money and for an ammature production the show went well. it is not a professional company so kudos for them. ive heard good reports on this show and yours is mearly one bad comment drowned in alot of good ones.
Walter PlingeMon, 17 Sept 2007, 03:07 pm

I'm wondering what you mean

I'm wondering what you mean Alissa by your comment - it is very difficult to understand... I saw the production and I didn't think it was very good either. As far as the initial review goes, I actually thought it was pretty balanced. The reviewer didn't just say that your production was crap, they picked out the good points as well and offered some constructive comments. As far as 'wasting money' goes (and i think that you are referring to the money spent on rights which was about $6500 right?) - I don't think that that has any bearing on the quality of production you put on. A company knows the cost of rights before the production goes on. I agree - given your cast, you did an okay job - but the production wasn't good. And finally, in response to "and for an ammature production the show went well. it is not a professional company so kudos for them" - well, I've seen a lot of amature productions that have great production values. For example, Mandurah Little Theatre's production of Grease was very good! I think that the comment "because it's community theatre, doesn't give it the excuse to be crap." was right on the money.
DazzaBMon, 17 Sept 2007, 03:11 pm

An interesting comment

An interesting comment Linda K... You are right, for several productions there are very strict conditions for putting it on. West Side Story is one of the strictest I have encountered... For most productions however, a director does have license to change/cut approximately 10% of the script to suit the companies needs... (Any more and you need to seek permission from whichever company owns the rights) I'm not sure where Grease fits in here (I've never directed it myself) but given that the company added/changed a couple of songs, I would be guessing that this is not one of the strict ones...
Walter PlingeMon, 17 Sept 2007, 03:28 pm

i saw this show too. I

i saw this show too. I reckon the first guy who reviewed it should chill out a bit. it was okay. i mean yeah, there was a few things that werent good. i didnt like the dance comp, it was way too short. the music was a bit dodgy to. some of the songs sounded like midis and others sounded like band music that had been taped. i reckon marty did a good job of her song too. she was a bit quiet but that was probably coz of the mike. the chick who was sandy was HOT in her costume at the end. awesome! she can kick me in the chest anytime she wants! and wicked car hey! if you havent seen the show they have a real car on stage. its great people shoudl try to look at the good things hey. the show wasnt perfect but what show is?
RandomBoiMon, 17 Sept 2007, 03:39 pm

I would just like to state

I would just like to state that a review is one person's opinion. I have voiced mine in the best way I can think of. I tried to be as constructive as I could as opposed to just saying that I didn't like it - I see no point in being needlessly mean in a review. However, I didn't like the production. Different people have different tastes!

I don't think that this is the place to discuss the quality of my review though. This is the space to talk about the show. If you have a different opinion from mine then write it up! Maybe you saw the show on a different night and the performances were better... This is the nature of live theatre, no two shows are exactly the same.

Walter PlingeTue, 18 Sept 2007, 11:08 am

Grease used to be the word...

Oh My God! This show was possibly the worst thign I've EVER seen! I think everyone on here has been waaay too nice so far! It was pure crap! I don't even know where to start with how bad this show was! I'm sick and tired of tiny amature companies taking on these BIG shows and killing them! Do something that's right for your stage and you talent base. Grease was just too much for what you had available. What about Little Shop of Horrors - that's more your size I reckon. Although, given the people you have available for your shows, maybe not - I'd hate to see you do to Little Shop what you did to Grease!!! This show stunk!
jadeylilTue, 18 Sept 2007, 11:48 am

Grease in the Burbs

I went to Rockingham on Sunday for the matinee show. Being a big Grease fan I too was disapointed. It was such a shame that the performers just had a huge lack of energy! It was like watching corpses on stage! If the energy had of been there then a bad note here or there would have been overlooked. We went to be entertained! Isn't that what theatre is about! Most of the cast looked bored out of their brains and hardly anyone played to the audience. The timing was so out in parts of the dialogue. In fact they just looked exhausted! Best performer was Jan, I also liked Rizzo and thought Frenchy and Marty did ok too. Sandy did look great in her black costume and has a good voice but didn't come across as likeable and kind of looked fed up. Maybe she was just as frustrated as the rest of us. I think there is another week to go of performances so come on guys lift your energy and just enjoy yourselves, it is GREASE afterall!! PLEASE DITCH THE MEDLEY AT THE END. IT IS PAINFUL!!!
Walter PlingeTue, 18 Sept 2007, 03:08 pm

huh??

hey, are you saying that you think the cast was pretty crap here? Cause that's what it sounds like! There was an Alissa in the show... Is that you? If so, you're not the most supportive person are you? If I was in a cast with you and saw a comment like that I'd wanna kick your ass! And if you are the Alissa from the show, where do you get off picking on your fellow cast members - you were one of the worst on stage! You just didn't get the role of Patty at all. She's supposed to be really bubbly and in-your-face-annoying. You just looked bored!
Walter PlingeTue, 18 Sept 2007, 09:41 pm

yeah that was me. i dont

yeah that was me. i dont give a crap what you think of me. i dont care. i dont do this for my every day career its fun. move on get over it. the cast know how i feel about them. we are all very close. we all know we come for different skill levels. who are you to judge.
Walter PlingeTue, 18 Sept 2007, 09:55 pm

Rockingham theatre Believe

Rockingham theatre Believe in "community theatre" this includes promotion and support for all theatre companies and including a large cross section of the community in productions. This would encompass new and/ or inexperienced people, people with disabilities, none singers, non dancers, all ages and genders and sexualities. A musical production includes all these and more, this eclectic group become a community in the true sense of theatre. We have been to see hundreds or shows some great and some not so good, some awful, both ammuture and professional, but for the greater good and promotion all of the people who need to be involved in theatre for reasons- such as chronic shyness, low self esteem, confidence building, social skills, speech improvement or just pure fun- it is far better to offer support and constructive criticism than sarcasm and vitriol for ones own self inflating ego. Try to remember community theatres are restricted by budget, venue, volunteers, available resources and talent, unlike pro- productions that have all the facilities available and can budget their wants list and not their wish lists. The best judge of successful community theatre is the good old "bums on seats" and the happy punters leaving singing and hyped after each show, the boost in confidence in some shy chorus kids who suddenly believe in themselves. Far more important than an unsolicited opinion of a mean spirited citizen with little to support the observations or rather lack of observations made for the self promotion and inflation of some strange ego. Best wishes to you.
Walter PlingeWed, 19 Sept 2007, 09:13 am

Kudos to you for that

Kudos to you for that comment. I've seen the show and I think that some of these reviews are too harsh - particularly the one by "disappointed." This production was put on by a bunch of young people, and if you read the program, you would know that many of them were on stage for the first time. If you are going to criticise, do it constructively - don't just bash the show! I think a lot of the people in this show have lots of potential, and I hope they all keep going with it. For people who have other jobs or school to worry about as well they did a good job. Sure, it wasn't perfect, but what is? I do have to agree though that the medley at the end was a bit much. Great job at building your community!
Walter PlingeWed, 19 Sept 2007, 04:43 pm

Community Theatre

i've read all of the comments posted on this show far and I think one of the major discussion points here is interesting. Okay, so this production of Grease is a community show right? A couple people have said bad things about it, some people have said good things - that's fine, people are entitled to different opinions. the interesting thing is the question about what to expect from community theatres. Well done to them says: "Try to remember community theatres are restricted by budget, venue, volunteers, available resources and talent, unlike pro- productions that have all the facilities available and can budget their wants list and not their wish lists." my answer to that is that it is amazing what you can do with a small budget if you use your ingenuity! Budget should not really come into consideration for the performance quality of a show. the most common complaint so far has been the low energy of the performers. this is the important issue! And i don't think this has anything to do with whether the company is professional or amature. The performance i saw (sunday matinee) had very low energy. i think that if the cast were more enrgetic the performance/entertainment quality of the show would of been much better. the cast are all clearly talented people, they just need to think about giving more energy to their performance. this would lift the show immensely. I think the company actually did really well in the way of set and costume. I think they used the budget they had very well - this wasn't the problem with the show. If anyone from the cast is reading this forum - pass the message on: you have a good show, you just need to give it the energy it deserves and people will stop saying bad things. you have one more weekend of shows right? give it your all and see what the result is on here! Break a leg
RandomBoiWed, 19 Sept 2007, 04:51 pm

I am beginning to regret

I am beginning to regret posting what I thought was a constructive review. That was not me being mean, I promise you. Alissa, there is no need to respond to such a blatant attempt to stir you up - this person has even called themselves stirrer! Trust in your performance. If you are happy with it, you don't need to listen to that kind of juveile nonsense. I gave no comment on your performance because I thought it was fine. It didn't stand out, but it was good. I actually liked the scene where you were trying to get Danny's attention while doing your stretches. To Stirrer - Please be constructive! I feel that I have opened up a nasty can of worms by posting this review. My hope was that someone from Rockingham Theatre Company would read it and take on the constructive points. If it came accross as scathing and mean - my apologies. I did not enjoy the show, but I do respect the effort that went in (particularly from the performers) to put this show on stage. In actuality I think the cast has a lot of potential, I just did not see that potential realised during the performance I saw. Break a leg for the remainder of your season. Kyle Grant
Walter PlingeWed, 19 Sept 2007, 08:50 pm

kyle, it did come across

kyle, it did come across rude, and im sorry i snapped back. in no ways did i mean that. im still grieving over the loss of my best friend. and yes that should effect my performance, i wasnt having a go at you about the guy that said i was crap. thats his thought, in fact id love to see him perform. just proving a point.... about seeing some pro shows not that good.... i saw alice in wonderland today although a ballet it was full of acting and i was highly disapointed. the best thing was the sets. so it goes to show you even the pros have bad runs. but others liked it. just ones opinion is different from anothers.
KnickersFri, 21 Sept 2007, 02:25 pm

The proof is really in the

The proof is really in the pudding isnt it? The theatre is packed every performance. Most evenings the audience are on their feet clapping and cheering through that 17 minute mega mix at the end. We thank them for their audience participation, it spurs us on to do better. Thanks for your constructive critisism, we have had some tech difficulties, many productions do.. The feedback has been hugely positive on emergence from the dressing rooms on all nights. Matinee's are notoriously quiet. If you want a more noisy raucous experience, come on a Friday or Saturday night.... Please remember, we do this for fun, its not our jobs.. The Rockingham Theatre is a tight knit group of people who try to do the very best they can with what they are provided with. Bev Heckingbottom has got a lot of experience, but she is trying to teach people to dance with two left feet!! The show is full of wonderful hard working people who have given up alot of their time to put the show on. Some of us can sing and others can dance. Please dont mistake bored faces for frustrated ones who are trying to put one foot in front of the other!!:-)
BiglouieSat, 22 Sept 2007, 11:35 am

Applause to Knickers

You're right Knickers. Despite what the "stuffed shirts" say, the proof is in the pudding. Sell-Out shows, audiences dancing in front of their seats and in the aisles, and raucous applause is the only review necessary. And that's the kind of audience reaction this show is recieving.
Paul TreasureTue, 25 Sept 2007, 06:44 pm

Playing Devil's Advocate

Sorry... didn'y see "Grease" so my comment is not directed at the production, but at the people saying that because it was a sold out show it must have been good. I'm sorry but that's nonsense! I have been involved in a couple of shows in my time that have sold out before the curtain went up on the opening night. So even if they had been the biggest load of tripe ever created they were still sold out. There is financial success and there is artistic success, you can have both but one does NOT necessarily mean the other. Then again audience numbers do not necessarily mean financial success either... I have seen sold out shows only just break even and shows with an average of a third of an audience per night make a huge profit. Oh... and to Biglouie "Sell-Out shows, audiencesi dancing in front of their seats and in the aisles, and raucous applause is the only review necessary." Was the show good? (I don't know I didn't see it) fine... but could it have been BRILLIANT! Don't EVER settle... unless the show was perfect (which almost never happens) keep pushing yourselves... Keep thinking - wow if this is the reaction we get now what could we get if we push it further! You don't owe that to your audience, you owe that to yourself!
DazzaBWed, 26 Sept 2007, 09:22 am

Constructive Criticism

I would like to say that I think a review like this one is totally unfair! Not because you have said you didn't like it - to be honest, I thought the show was average at best - but all you have done with this review is slam the show. No constructive criticism at all! I don't think it's fair to do that. When you post a review like the one above all you are doing is making yourself sound jealous - did you audition for the show and not get in or something?? And it's totally unfair to say: "Although, given the people you have available for your shows, maybe not - I'd hate to see you do to Little Shop what you did to Grease!!!" You simply have no right to make judgement calls like that! For your information, RTC put on Little Shop of Horrors a few years ago (also directed by Beverly Heckingbottom) and the show was excellent! Please think about what you're writing in these reviews - you don't have to say a show was great, but don't just say it was crap - people won't take you seriously if you say that. Give some constructive feedback and try and talk about the things that did go well for the production as well. In Grease, some of the individual performances were excellent - credit where credit is due! Darren
DazzaBWed, 26 Sept 2007, 11:24 am

More thoughts...

After recent questions regarding the support I offer to community theatre in the city I live in, I would like to add a little more regarding this particular show. Please remember that when I write a review I try to offer constructive criticism in the hope that those reviewed will take on board what I say and use it to grow and develop their own skills. This is what I do - I crave honest reviews for my performances as I know that I am not perfect and still have a HUGE amount to learn. However, I am not the be all and end all of reviewers, I don't know everything there is to know about thetare and if you wish to ignore my opinion, feel free - after all it is simply that - my opinion :) RTC's production of Grease was, in my opinion, not their best work. I actually agree with most of what was written in the intial review - which is why I didn't post something larger initially myself. I would like to re-iterate my comments regarding the size of Rockignham Theatre. This is a small venue, and given the size restrictions and technical capabilites of the venue I think that RTC gave Grease a good shot. I did not agree with the casting - I felt that having a Danny that was visibly younger than the bulk of the other T-Birds didn't work - however I was not present at auditions, so I do not know how many people (in particular, men) they had turn up. I am guessing that this was the best cast they could put together. I understand that it is sometimes VERY difficult to get the cast you would like. My other concern with the casting was regarding the youth of the Pink Ladies next to the T-Birds. I felt uncomfortable at the highly visible age difference between the older T-Birds and the younger Pink Ladies - particularly when the more intimate moments occurred. However, once again, the company had to work with the people they had audition. I thought that many individual cast members gave excellent performances. Danny, Sandy, Rizzo, Sonny, Jan and Roger were stand outs for me. They approached their roles with confidence and gave energy to their performances throughout - well done. I felt that the rest of the cast lacked energy. This may well have been due to the heavy performance schedule coupled with the fact that the cast of volunteers have full lives outside of the theatre, but it did impact upon the performance that I saw. I have however heard that the energy levels were lifted for the final week of performance - well done. To the director, I have seen other shows you have directed and been most impressed - in particular Little Shop of Horrors in 1999. Your direction for that show was innovative and exciting. I did not feel that you employed the same innovation for this show. At times the blocking seemed somewhat superfluous - for example, when Sandy began to sing Hopelessly Devoted To You she climbed to the top of the stairs (which I thought had been arranged to form the walls of the bedroom) sang two lines and then descended the stair case and moved downstage to stand in front of the curtain line so that the curtains could be drawn for a scene change. I personally felt that this move was un-needed and it confused me. I don't think it added to the actor's performance of the song. I believe that you were unable to get musicians to play live music for this show. That explains the pre-recorded music and I do understand how difficult it can be to get musicians. I feel though that at times both the singers and the dancers were out of time with the music. If you install a couple fold-back speakers this will help with this issue. In all, as I said earlier, I don't feel Grease was RTC's best work, but I also don't agree with those people that have posted remarks like "This show stunk." Those remarks are unconstructive and mean. I feel that the cast were a talented bunch of people (many of whom had never performed before) with large amounts of potential. I hope that all of them continue to perform and hone their skills as I believe they all have some great things to offer the arts in this area. Regards Darren
Walter PlingeFri, 28 Sept 2007, 11:35 pm

We saw Grease at Rockingham

We saw Grease at Rockingham and there were definitely no people standing up and dancing or cheering in the seemingly endless - horrible megamix.... I agree with everything that was written in the initial review here. Some performances were good (especially Rizzo and Eugene and Danny), but in general, it left a lot to be desired.
Walter PlingeSat, 29 Sept 2007, 09:55 am

Yes, megamix was a bit

Yes, megamix was a bit pointless, but I thought it was a good effort for a small community theatre, and although I had a few issues with parts of it my teenage daughter and her friend loved it.
Walter PlingeTue, 2 Oct 2007, 02:04 pm

The right to an opinion

I think the point has been missed by a few people here. The original review was well said, and very tame! Anyone who comes to watch a show - Community Theatre or Professional Production - has the right to an opinion. When you step on that stage you are putting your performance out there for the audience to judge - isnt that the reason we do it? Even when you do it for fun - you still need to listen to the opinions and suggestions of those who watch you - otherwise you will never improve!!! It surely cant be fun to pull out the same tired performance every time? I have been in many small community productions and personally LOVE hearing what people thought of the show! Even those who say "it was crap" - You cant honestly think every member of the audience is going to love the show? And a small budget is no reason for a poor show - by most reviews I have read it wasnt the costumes or sets that was the problem - it was the energy of the cast and the choice of lead roles! Last time I checked - these things come for FREE!
Walter PlingeFri, 5 Oct 2007, 08:00 pm

View from the inside

As a cast member of grease, i feel i have the right to make my comment in reference to all comments and reviews on this website... I have to say i agree with the initial review posted by random boi, i as a professional in the arts understand that a review is written as one persons oppinion of the which i have just perormed, and is generally not written to slag off the performers, or directors, or companies, but to put forward a different view for the performers, directors and companies to take on board to better thier performance. I have had my fair share of bad reviews, and take on board all that is said to do my best to make each performance better than the last! As has been said all throuout the comments on this site, it is not the budget that makes a show what it is. The best amature theatre show i have seen (as an audience), was Up for grabs, a play directed by Paul Treasure, at Kwinana Theatre Workshop, on a $200 budget! what makes a show, is direction, and the cast, who should be well cast, and completely in charactor and full of energy, the budget, (usually used for set and costumes), should only compliment, not make a performance! I thoroughly enjoyed performing grease, as rockingham theatre is like home for me! and the show was generally well recieved, but being on stage, all 11 shows, i never saw any one dancing in the isles, or singing along! grease is a guaranteed seller so there is absolutely no way you can judge your success on, bums on seats! i encourage all who have seen grease, and/or read the reviews, to go back to roko, and see what shows they do in the future, i will agree that grease probably isn't the best show that has been put on there, but at the same time i have been in, and seen some amazing shows at the castle! Chookas to all in there next show! and i hope to see you all there in the future! bob
← Back to Theatre Reviews