Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Pride and Prejudice ****

Sun, 4 Feb 2007, 11:06 am
Gordon the Optom6 posts in thread
Pride and Prejudice’ is the latest amateur production from the Melville Theatre Company. It is showing until Mid February.

For an amateur group’s director to choose such a well known classic, one would think it to be total madness. However Vanessa Jensen directed Constance Cox’s two and a half hour dramatisation beautifully. There was a large cast to handle but the essence of the original was retained.

The acting standard was well above average, with several outstanding performances. Surprisingly one of the more senior, and experienced actors, had more than one’s share of fluffs and lengthy ‘dries’.

The costumes were stunning, plush and of the period. The set was versatile with small changes to suggest different location. The side of the proscenium arch being used for a street scene whilst the open stage was quietly and efficiently changed. The director and dramatist also used a novel way of changing locality, by having the maids spring clean the room, whilst acting. By the time they had finished the house was that of a different family.

A very brave risk, which paid off admirably. Congratulations.

Thread (6 posts)

Gordon the OptomSun, 4 Feb 2007, 11:06 am
Pride and Prejudice’ is the latest amateur production from the Melville Theatre Company. It is showing until Mid February.

For an amateur group’s director to choose such a well known classic, one would think it to be total madness. However Vanessa Jensen directed Constance Cox’s two and a half hour dramatisation beautifully. There was a large cast to handle but the essence of the original was retained.

The acting standard was well above average, with several outstanding performances. Surprisingly one of the more senior, and experienced actors, had more than one’s share of fluffs and lengthy ‘dries’.

The costumes were stunning, plush and of the period. The set was versatile with small changes to suggest different location. The side of the proscenium arch being used for a street scene whilst the open stage was quietly and efficiently changed. The director and dramatist also used a novel way of changing locality, by having the maids spring clean the room, whilst acting. By the time they had finished the house was that of a different family.

A very brave risk, which paid off admirably. Congratulations.

Walter PlingeThu, 8 Feb 2007, 10:23 pm

But you left out the most

But you left out the most crucial factor: which girl was most shaggable?
Jodie HansenFri, 9 Feb 2007, 01:44 pm

Tsk tsk Peter

Very classy comment, Peter - very classy....... The answer of course is Lady Catherine - she is the one with the money!!!
Walter PlingeFri, 9 Feb 2007, 02:01 pm

I think he meant the

I think he meant the actresses, not the characters they play
Walter PlingeSun, 11 Feb 2007, 03:48 pm

This Production I thought

This Production I thought was very well put together , the cast were so beautifully placed in their characters and the set and costumes were just lovely. It is so many people's favorite story of all time and they did a brilliant job at pulling it off. There were so many outstanding performances from people that I dont feel the need to single out anyone in particular. Well done to the director and the cast and everyone else bravo !!!
Walter PlingeWed, 21 Feb 2007, 10:40 am

The question is , who out

The question is , who out of them all would you want to shag ? ? ?
← Back to Theatre Reviews