Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Discharge *** 1/2

Fri, 29 Sept 2006, 12:58 pm
Gordon the Optom7 posts in thread

Matt Penny’s new play ‘Discharge’ is showing at the Blue Room Studio, Northbridge until Saturday 30th September at 9.00 pm.

The show starts with a warm-up Claymation video. This short is made in the style of ‘Wallace and Grommet’ and is called ‘The dog that farts fire’. The very funny, well-produced piece, made by Matt, shows among other things what is really behind the scenes of the Australia Day fireworks display.

The next sketch is about two hospital orderlies (Matt Penny and Joshua Crane) having to clean a toilet that has more shit on it than can be produced by three vindaloos. They talk about the different types of shit and their sources. There were lots of cringing groans from the audience as they laughed heartily, then for some reason the ‘f-word’ and the ‘c word’ appeared several times in this comic act, quite unnecessarily, and this killed the sketch. Am I a prude? This language wasn’t as frequently employed in a rough and threatening film like ‘Last train to Freo’. A pity.

There then followed a Claymation scene based in a hospital ward. The script was funny, the puppets and the sets had humour and the technique and skill employed was well above average and worth watching – but – the voices were put onto the action by actors standing in front of the screen, a major distraction to the action and the storyline. Why not simply use a voice-over microphone?

Next we eavesdropped on the hospital’s two gardeners, sorry groundsmen (Kingsley Judd and Michael Rae), as they had their tea break.  A different genre again, a good script with an unexpected twist, very well carried off with plenty of subtle humour from both actors.

In the next scene, a doctor had been called to see the Hospital Administrator about a serious event observed on the hospital’s security video. Helen Burgess was excellent as the official, determined to get to the bottom of the misdemeanour, whilst the errant doctor (Peter Clark) who started with a ‘what’s your problem?’ attitude soon broke down to a near suicidal state. A tremendous piece of acting from Peter.

Nurses have all the knowledge to kill patients as well as save them – but what is more rewarding? Nurse, Summer Williams, gave an explanation of euthanasia so convincing that my elderly relatives should beware.

Then these four completely different genres are all cut and intermixed together. This broke the flow. I am sorry to be hard on this show as it was a lot of fun. It had great ideas, tackled with new approaches, was innovating in the staging, but in the end left me a little confused and frustrated.

Great lighting from Steve Warren

If Matt, who is obviously very talented at many levels, worked with a partner off whom he could bounce ideas and help him hone the script, then this could be a superb show. I look forward to his next show.

Thread (7 posts)

Gordon the OptomFri, 29 Sept 2006, 12:58 pm

Matt Penny’s new play ‘Discharge’ is showing at the Blue Room Studio, Northbridge until Saturday 30th September at 9.00 pm.

The show starts with a warm-up Claymation video. This short is made in the style of ‘Wallace and Grommet’ and is called ‘The dog that farts fire’. The very funny, well-produced piece, made by Matt, shows among other things what is really behind the scenes of the Australia Day fireworks display.

The next sketch is about two hospital orderlies (Matt Penny and Joshua Crane) having to clean a toilet that has more shit on it than can be produced by three vindaloos. They talk about the different types of shit and their sources. There were lots of cringing groans from the audience as they laughed heartily, then for some reason the ‘f-word’ and the ‘c word’ appeared several times in this comic act, quite unnecessarily, and this killed the sketch. Am I a prude? This language wasn’t as frequently employed in a rough and threatening film like ‘Last train to Freo’. A pity.

There then followed a Claymation scene based in a hospital ward. The script was funny, the puppets and the sets had humour and the technique and skill employed was well above average and worth watching – but – the voices were put onto the action by actors standing in front of the screen, a major distraction to the action and the storyline. Why not simply use a voice-over microphone?

Next we eavesdropped on the hospital’s two gardeners, sorry groundsmen (Kingsley Judd and Michael Rae), as they had their tea break.  A different genre again, a good script with an unexpected twist, very well carried off with plenty of subtle humour from both actors.

In the next scene, a doctor had been called to see the Hospital Administrator about a serious event observed on the hospital’s security video. Helen Burgess was excellent as the official, determined to get to the bottom of the misdemeanour, whilst the errant doctor (Peter Clark) who started with a ‘what’s your problem?’ attitude soon broke down to a near suicidal state. A tremendous piece of acting from Peter.

Nurses have all the knowledge to kill patients as well as save them – but what is more rewarding? Nurse, Summer Williams, gave an explanation of euthanasia so convincing that my elderly relatives should beware.

Then these four completely different genres are all cut and intermixed together. This broke the flow. I am sorry to be hard on this show as it was a lot of fun. It had great ideas, tackled with new approaches, was innovating in the staging, but in the end left me a little confused and frustrated.

Great lighting from Steve Warren

If Matt, who is obviously very talented at many levels, worked with a partner off whom he could bounce ideas and help him hone the script, then this could be a superb show. I look forward to his next show.

Walter PlingeSat, 30 Sept 2006, 08:47 pm

You are a prude.

Gordon the Optom wrote: "There were lots of cringing groans from the audiencei as they laughed heartily, then for some reason the ‘f-word’ and the ‘c word’ appeared several times in this comic act, quite unnecessarily, and this killed the sketch. Am I a prude?" Aha! That's why you didn't review 'Dinner' at Playlovers then?
NaSat, 30 Sept 2006, 10:34 pm

Editors and writers are

Editors and writers are taught that swear words should not be used unnecessarily or over-used. Perhaps Gordon is a prude - or perhaps his reaction is simply a sign that we are over using them in general life. The Prompt Copy Networking emerging theatre professionals www.thepromptcopy.com Sticky Apple Legs http://stickyapplelegs.artsblogs.com Puppets in Melbourne www.freewebs.com/puppetsinmelbourne
Gordon the OptomSat, 30 Sept 2006, 11:27 pm

Sorry, I didn't see

Sorry, I didn't see 'Dinner'.

I laugh at Billy Connelly and even Chopper, but there is a place for everything.

Unless you know the age and the expectations of the audience who are going to turn up, perhaps be careful. There were a couple of 80 (?) year old ladies behind me who may have been disappointed.

Daniel KershawSun, 1 Oct 2006, 08:50 am

excessive swearing should

excessive swearing should not be used in theatre, especially in comedy. The only place where it works, in my opinion, is realistic drama - because when there is conflict in real life, we tend to let off a few f's.
LogosSun, 1 Oct 2006, 09:10 am

Swearing

Swearing is incredibly valuable as a shock point. A tool to make the audience respond. Overuse in any media is not a good idea. We do swear in day to day life, but we live in a society where swearing is once again becoming less common in wider public use than in my youth and middle years. From a point of dialogue as writers we need to refect accurately the way people around us speak. Gordon was right to comment and far from being prudish. The use of swearing simply to shock is pointless. I also agree with Daniel that swearing is not inherently funny. It gets laughs because of nervousness in the audience, it's a cheap laugh and detracts from what you are trying to say with your satire. I now have to admit that I didn't see the show and am working in the dark. I tried to stay general though. Is that all there is? Well if that's all there is my friend, then let's keep dancing. www.tonymoore.id.au
crgwllmsMon, 2 Oct 2006, 02:20 am

Abuse of abuse

I don't agree with your '...especially in comedy' statement. In my opinion, comedy works best when it is grounded in realism...and so by your definition, swearing is not at all out of place. Remember the opening scene of "Four Weddings and a Funeral"? Letting off more than a few (in fact nothing but) f's. Hilarious. It's true excessive swearing can be detrimental in theatre...not, as Logos infers, because of the shock value of the words themselves wearing thin, but more generally - the overuse of ANYTHING wears thin on an audience. Too much stillness, too much movement, too much of the same lighting effect, too much shouting, too much plot exposition....the audience loves to be surprised, and "too much" becomes predictable and boring. Use swearing, and anything else, wisely....earn the right to cause a reaction in your audience, without abusing that right. Cheers, Craig ~<8>-/====\---------
← Back to Theatre Reviews