Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Sweet Charity *****

Wed, 14 June 2006, 05:40 pm
Gordon the Optom4 posts in thread

Sweet Charity’ is running at the WAAPA Theatre in ECU Mount Lawley campus until 22nd June 2006. It is a second and third year music theatre production.


In giving a rating for a production, as well as the general enjoyment factor, I take into consideration use of the cast’s potential acting skills and experience, along with the quality of the lighting, costumes and scenery in relation to the estimated budget. A primary school Nativity Play could consequently, in theory, get five stars.

On going to see this opening night I therefore ‘demanded’ to be entertained to a high level and was prepared to mark hard, but like all of the audience, I emerged totally gob-smacked!!

‘Sweet Charity’ is a simple story by Neil Simon about a ‘hostess’ who after eight years on the game in a sleazy nightclub, has decided to try and find true love and settle down. The script is hilarious, especially the scenes ‘trapped in the lift’ and ‘Vidal’s bedroom’. The comic timing of the cast is perfect.

The two-dozen strong musicians of the WA Youth Jazz Orchestra, under the inspirational direction of David King played flawlessly. With wonderfully arranged numbers like ‘Hey, Big Spender’ and ‘If they could see me now!’ the whole auditorium was foot tapping.

Because of the huge number of songs and the almost non-stop acrobatic acting required by the central character, Charity, director Crispin Taylor decided to employ three ‘Charitys’ to share the load. I was apprehensive as to how well this would work, but he made three very different looking girls into ‘one’ person. Their accents matched, and their changeovers from one actor to another coincided with the required subtle character and personality changes, making the switches almost unnoticeable. Amazing casting.

Enhanced with the well thought out lighting and the inventive costumes, which ranged from dull raincoats to psychedelic flower-power caftans as in scenes like the uproarious ‘The Church of Life’, Jenny Lynnd’s choreography was a major highlight. The stage was regularly filled with dancers, all interweaving and performing complex routines in perfect synchronisation, which reminded one of a Rubik’s cube being solved.

The aloof’ and ‘The heavyweight’ complex dance sequences were breathtaking. The ensemble wore black and white costumes for the numbers. Kathryn Sgroi smoothly slinked her way around the stage mesmerising the audience.

The director of ‘Dusty’ was in the audience to see his daughter, Lucy Maunder, play Charity (character 2) and must have gone home very proud, but worried. Worried as to whether his show matched the immense vitality and stunning choreography of this WAAPA production?

A small dilemma. If two very talented performers are required to have thick accents for their characters, but are then required to perform one of the most famous songs of the show, is it more important for them to retain their accent, which consequently weakens their delivery, or can they be allowed to drift a little and so allow their skilled voices to belt out the number as it should be performed? I think the latter.

Special bouquets must go to Kate Hanley (Charity 1), Robert Bertram (Oscar her loved one), the club boss (was this Stephen Mahy?) and dancer Kathryn Sgroi.

At the end of the show, Chrystal de Grussa was presented with this year’s prestigious Warnock Student’s Award.

One runs out of superlatives in describing this show. It is the best choreography that I have seen in any theatre show, ever! No mean task. MANY CONGRATULATIONS.

Thread (4 posts)

Gordon the OptomWed, 14 June 2006, 05:40 pm

Sweet Charity’ is running at the WAAPA Theatre in ECU Mount Lawley campus until 22nd June 2006. It is a second and third year music theatre production.


In giving a rating for a production, as well as the general enjoyment factor, I take into consideration use of the cast’s potential acting skills and experience, along with the quality of the lighting, costumes and scenery in relation to the estimated budget. A primary school Nativity Play could consequently, in theory, get five stars.

On going to see this opening night I therefore ‘demanded’ to be entertained to a high level and was prepared to mark hard, but like all of the audience, I emerged totally gob-smacked!!

‘Sweet Charity’ is a simple story by Neil Simon about a ‘hostess’ who after eight years on the game in a sleazy nightclub, has decided to try and find true love and settle down. The script is hilarious, especially the scenes ‘trapped in the lift’ and ‘Vidal’s bedroom’. The comic timing of the cast is perfect.

The two-dozen strong musicians of the WA Youth Jazz Orchestra, under the inspirational direction of David King played flawlessly. With wonderfully arranged numbers like ‘Hey, Big Spender’ and ‘If they could see me now!’ the whole auditorium was foot tapping.

Because of the huge number of songs and the almost non-stop acrobatic acting required by the central character, Charity, director Crispin Taylor decided to employ three ‘Charitys’ to share the load. I was apprehensive as to how well this would work, but he made three very different looking girls into ‘one’ person. Their accents matched, and their changeovers from one actor to another coincided with the required subtle character and personality changes, making the switches almost unnoticeable. Amazing casting.

Enhanced with the well thought out lighting and the inventive costumes, which ranged from dull raincoats to psychedelic flower-power caftans as in scenes like the uproarious ‘The Church of Life’, Jenny Lynnd’s choreography was a major highlight. The stage was regularly filled with dancers, all interweaving and performing complex routines in perfect synchronisation, which reminded one of a Rubik’s cube being solved.

The aloof’ and ‘The heavyweight’ complex dance sequences were breathtaking. The ensemble wore black and white costumes for the numbers. Kathryn Sgroi smoothly slinked her way around the stage mesmerising the audience.

The director of ‘Dusty’ was in the audience to see his daughter, Lucy Maunder, play Charity (character 2) and must have gone home very proud, but worried. Worried as to whether his show matched the immense vitality and stunning choreography of this WAAPA production?

A small dilemma. If two very talented performers are required to have thick accents for their characters, but are then required to perform one of the most famous songs of the show, is it more important for them to retain their accent, which consequently weakens their delivery, or can they be allowed to drift a little and so allow their skilled voices to belt out the number as it should be performed? I think the latter.

Special bouquets must go to Kate Hanley (Charity 1), Robert Bertram (Oscar her loved one), the club boss (was this Stephen Mahy?) and dancer Kathryn Sgroi.

At the end of the show, Chrystal de Grussa was presented with this year’s prestigious Warnock Student’s Award.

One runs out of superlatives in describing this show. It is the best choreography that I have seen in any theatre show, ever! No mean task. MANY CONGRATULATIONS.

TylerJFri, 16 June 2006, 12:33 am

SWEET CHARITY

SWEET CHARITY WAAPA’s production of SWEET CHARITY, presented by the Third Year Music Theatre students and featuring the Second Years as ensemble members, is a bright, colourful, slick and original mounting of a classic show. SWEET CHARITY premiered on Broadway in 1966, directed by the legendary Bob Fosse with his wife Gwen Verdon playing the title role. The show features a wonderful, 60s flavoured score by Cy Coleman, with lyrics by Dorothy Fields, and the book is by playwright Neil Simon. This production is unique in that it has three actresses alternating the central role of Charity in the one performance, as it would be a demanding role for a single student performer to undertake alongside regular classes. I was at first skeptical of how this might work, but the marvelous execution of the concept won me over, and I applaud director Crispin Taylor for introducing such a fresh idea to the show. Kate Hanley, the show’s first Charity, gave an endearingly goofy interpretation of the role, her winning smile and quirky mannerisms inviting comparisons with a young Carol Burnett. Vocally expressive and bursting with energy, she was a delight to watch and it was a sad moment when she passed the hat (literally!) to Lucy Maunder a third of the way through the show. But a sad ‘moment’ was all it was, for in a matter of seconds the audience was entranced by Lucy’s fresh take on the character – even portions of sweetness and sexiness rolled together into an equally justified Charity. With a truly electrifying presence, strong, clear voice and superb comic timing, Lucy really energized the central portion of the show. Janine Atwill brought the show home with her bright, excitable, happy-go-lucky Charity. Her portion of the show required her to navigate a wider emotional range than the others, but she executed Charity’s sadder scenes with ease. Not only delivering a poignant rendition of “Where Am I Going?”, she slid effortlessly into production-number mode for the spectacular “I’m a Brass Band”. Overall, I felt that the “three Charity” concept kept the show fresh and interesting, while also showcasing three dynamic, talented and employable young performers. The supporting players were all fantastic and well-cast. Most notably, Robert Bertram as Oscar Lindquist; he entered the show just prior to the first act curtain and almost ran away with the whole thing (he would’ve too, if the rest of the cast hadn’t been so darn talented, hehe). The frequent laughs that came from the character were in large part thanks to Robert’s detailed and genuine characterization, which endeared the character to the audience. It also made his actions near the conclusion of the show all the more shocking and deplorable. As Charity’s best friends, Nickie and Helene, Katie Allison and Anna Tsirigotis were two major highlights. Their comic timing and accents were both flawless and sustained throughout the length of the show (even throughout their songs, which did not detract from my immense enjoyment of the musical numbers one little bit). Both shone in the showstopping “There’s Gotta Be Something Better Than This”, Anna dancing up a storm with maximum sparkle and seemingly minimal effort, while Katie’s gorgeous and controlled soprano was showcased in the opening solo verses. Matt Edwards was brilliant as Italian heartthrob Vittorio Vidal, completely embodying the accent and mannerisms of the charismatic B-movie star, without ever resorting to parody. He glided effortlessly through his one number “Too Many Tomorrows” and it was a true shame he had to disappear from the story at such an early stage. Sarah Croser, who was absolutely stunning as Meredith in Bat Boy earlier this year, scored a number of laughs for herself in the small but amusing role of Ursula, Vittorio’s girlfriend. Further praise must be extended to David Hooley’s amusing Daddy (methinks a distant cousin of Emily Paddon-Brown’s hilarious Reverend Hightower in Bat Boy…) and first-rate minor players Vincent Hooper and Naomi Bourke, who both had the audience consistently amused throughout their many ensemble roles. Crispin Taylor may soon be lost under a heap of praise, so skillfully has he executed the role of director. He has crafted an incredibly slick show, with expert flow and never a dull moment. In terms of focus, I was always aware of where my eyes should be, even in potentially confusing crowd scenes such as ‘The Rescue’. The placement of the actors and their negotiation of the space were justified and never awkward, and I also enjoyed the use of different levels employed in some scenes, for example, Vittorio’s apartment, around the fountain and in the Coney Island scene where Charity and Oscar were flown in from above. I could attempt to isolate all of Taylor’s directorial touches that made this a truly phenomenal show, but there's enough of them to fill a whole other review (and then some), and the English language only provides a certain number of superlatives. Therefore, I will merely say Bravo, and encourage you all to applaud a truly stunning effort. Jenny Lynnd’s choreography was inventive, visually exciting and superbly executed. At times I felt as if I was watching a meticulously crafted human kaleidoscope, such was the thrilling and complex nature of the ever-changing shapes consistently filling the space. If the whole show were to be described as a meal, Lynnd’s choreography is certainly the salt and pepper that spices up what could otherwise be a bland dish. Congratulations!!! David King’s music direction was also superb. Every number sounded the way it should, bold and brassy in some places, soft and tender in others, and always with a professional sound. As conductor he also engaged pleasantly and professionally with the audience just prior to the Overture and the Entr'acte. It was in the musical numbers that the show really took off, which stands as a testament to the skill of both Lynnd and King. All in all, a fantastic show. I’ve run out of positive adjectives, so I may as well cut it off here before I start repeating myself. I cannot wait to see how this year’s crop of Music Theatre Third Years fare in the professional showbiz world post-graduation, as they are a dynamic and talented group of performers. I am a student of WAAPA's Certificate Music Theatre course this year, and have been incredibly inspired by the work I've seen these BA students accomplish. -Tyler Jones Any comments or feedback please send to tyler-j-jones@hotmail.com
Walter PlingeMon, 26 June 2006, 02:59 pm

Thick accents

Gordon the Optom wrote: "A small dilemma. If two very talented performers are required to have thick accents for their characters, but are then required to perform one of the most famous songs of the show, is it more important for them to retain their accent, which consequently weakens their delivery, or can they be allowed to drift a little and so allow their skilled voices to belt out the number as it should be performed? I think the latter." Exactly part of the problem with musical practitioners and musicals in general. Surely part of the skill of the performer is to perform in character and that means sing in character as well. It defeats the purpose of some musical singer talking in a Bronx accent and then starts singing in Queens English!
LabrugMon, 26 June 2006, 03:09 pm

My thoughts

It would very much depend upon the intention of the writer of the music and script wouldn't it? Besides which, many musicians around the world speak with one accent and sing with another quite naturally. Take (for example) Simple Minds who in their ealry days (and to a lesser degree today) speak with heavy Scotish and sing almost American. I think it is natural to expect that in a musical performance.

On the other hand, groups such as the Pretenders do have a rather unique flavour by singing in accent.

The question then needs to be, does the accent add or detrack from the performance? Go with whichever gives the better results.

My two cents..

Dixi

Jeff Watkins
Perth based Actor/Performer
Fight/Sword Choreographer

http://au.geocities.com/labrug

← Back to Theatre Reviews