what the...
Wed, 21 Dec 2005, 08:05 amWalter Plinge6 posts in thread
what the...
Wed, 21 Dec 2005, 08:05 amok, so who was it who said that australian theatre is sub standard?
granted the local companies could perhaps do with a cash injection, and the actors are less than impresive, but some do go on to better things..like neighbours!
are there any people who attend nada and wapa, that have any talent or do they just let any body in?
granted the local companies could perhaps do with a cash injection, and the actors are less than impresive, but some do go on to better things..like neighbours!
are there any people who attend nada and wapa, that have any talent or do they just let any body in?
Re: NADA just about sums it up
Thu, 29 Dec 2005, 03:01 pm"the arts industry"?
I don't think theatre or TV drama production qualifies to be called an industry in WA. For that you must actually produce something. Two professional theatre companies producing 10 or so heavily subsidised shows a year with about two dozen actors and the odd childrenÂ’s television series every year or so, an industry does not make. A cursory examination of the stats published by government instrumentalities in WA show most screen production is documentary. Maybe it could be called a cottage industry, but even that is stretching the definition.