Merry Wives of Windsor
Thu, 8 Sept 2005, 11:15 amWalter Plinge9 posts in thread
Merry Wives of Windsor
Thu, 8 Sept 2005, 11:15 amI had one of the most enjoyable experiences IÂ’ve ever had in theatre last night. ArenaÂ’s production of ShakespeareÂ’s Merry Wives of Windsor was so delightful and entertaining. Congratulations must go to Jo Williams for her original spin on one of the classics and for her brilliant direction. The actors were outstanding, presenting such a diverse range of characters, from an American priest to a French doctor. It is impossible to single out any particular actor because all were so committed.
I took some of my Year 11 and 12 students to see the performance and they all agreed how fantastic the show was. Not only has Arena produced a quality play, theyÂ’ve made Shakespeare accessible to younger viewers, Baz Lurhman style. There is also quite a bit of eye candy, guys and girls! IÂ’m telling you all now, GO AND SEE IT! ItÂ’s fantastic!
Again, congratulations on an outstanding show!!!
Oblivious D
I took some of my Year 11 and 12 students to see the performance and they all agreed how fantastic the show was. Not only has Arena produced a quality play, theyÂ’ve made Shakespeare accessible to younger viewers, Baz Lurhman style. There is also quite a bit of eye candy, guys and girls! IÂ’m telling you all now, GO AND SEE IT! ItÂ’s fantastic!
Again, congratulations on an outstanding show!!!
Oblivious D
Re: Merry Wives of Windsor
Thu, 15 Sept 2005, 02:22 pmWalter Plinge
I think I can say without fear of contradiction that Shakespeare has made a greater contribution to the English language than any other individual ever. His work stands the test of time, not only as literature but also as (capital D) Drama. This production thus becomes part of a living heritage. The question is - is it worthy?
The director thinks so. She says they use "signs, symbols and portents" (not to mention the soundtrack) from our modern world "to make Shakespeare understandable, accessible and, above all, fun". After all, at the end of the day, old Bill was a showman and then as now, 'bums on seats' was the name of the game.
I think they succeed. The language is antiquated and hard to understand, but you get the general idea (and most of the jokes) from the manner of delivery. I can just imagine Queen Bess cackling away at Falstaff's antics. The cast also seem to be enjoying themselves, which I am sure is what WS intended.
My thanks to Arena and all who sail in her for having a go and putting on a great show. Finally, I don't usually single out cast members, but I do thank Michael Lamont for being living confirmation of the Bard's immortal words "Big Blokes with Beards be Beautiful".
Thou spleeny dismal-dreaming haggard!
The director thinks so. She says they use "signs, symbols and portents" (not to mention the soundtrack) from our modern world "to make Shakespeare understandable, accessible and, above all, fun". After all, at the end of the day, old Bill was a showman and then as now, 'bums on seats' was the name of the game.
I think they succeed. The language is antiquated and hard to understand, but you get the general idea (and most of the jokes) from the manner of delivery. I can just imagine Queen Bess cackling away at Falstaff's antics. The cast also seem to be enjoying themselves, which I am sure is what WS intended.
My thanks to Arena and all who sail in her for having a go and putting on a great show. Finally, I don't usually single out cast members, but I do thank Michael Lamont for being living confirmation of the Bard's immortal words "Big Blokes with Beards be Beautiful".
Thou spleeny dismal-dreaming haggard!
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···