Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

a different Cabaret -- Gosford Musical Society

Sat, 23 Oct 2004, 06:05 pm
Walter Plinge52 posts in thread
If you like the musical "Cabaret" you will probably enjoy the current production from Gosford Musical Society, running from late October to early November.
There is much to like: Leigh Collins' sturdy stage setting has 2 staircases, 1 spiral staircase and a fireman's pole, and it consists of 5 discrete areas of the Kit Kat Club, on 2 levels. Once this set was built, it was not going to be moved, so other scenes have to be partially flown in from above ; this leaves a central problem that the club is still visible, as are its many patrons, and this is distracting ; in fact, even in the club scenes, there is so much activity, that it can be hard to pick out the major characters in their scenes.
There is also the usually high standard of lighting from Damian Rice ; always effective but never obtrusive. There is even a strobe segment where the effect is continued for a decent time (as a child of the 60s I love strobe and am always disappointed if timorous directors cut strobes off after a few seconds).
Suzanne Ohrt's characterization of Fraulein Schneider is a revelation, as is her soft-shoe dancing, and her meticulous German pronunciation.
The onstage appearance of Leo Del Oleo onstage with accordion and Tyrolean hat.
Sally Bowles, played by Toni Williams, has breathless dialogue delivered at rapidfire pace, but her speech is always intelligible.
Even the gentle lilting of a slide guitar in "The Pineapple Song".
Chris King has directed the production and it is a formidable tour de force. Chris is a well-known TV actor, and runs a talent school on the Coast. In this production we have characters moving into the audience, moving out from the audience, a ventriloquist (regrettably not speaking!), flashing telephones, even a descending filmscreen which features a great black and white sequence made for the occasion. It simulates a German train trip and for me was the highlight (some trainspotters may quibble over the NSW PTC logo on the upholstery!).
Yet the show was missing something ; was it me, or was it the script itself? Times have changed, and as s & m has moved into the mainstream, the sight of leather and lace doesn't really convey decadence, and certainly not sultriness ; the emcee was menacing, but I couldn't fathom to what purpose ; the overly-familiar risqué jokes and the groping of genitalia and other body parts was less shocking than clumsy, and not titillating at all . I came away impressed by the effects, but not the story ; insead there was a sequence of good performances that were seemingly unrelated, with noone grabbing the vacant position of "Star of the show" ; at no point did the hair rise on the back of the neck.
Don't let my feelings put you off, though ; go and judge for yourself, as there is still much to appreciate, and many in the audience seemed to like it. I can only say that I still don't know how the story ends -- I left at interval.

Don't know if you've noticed...WWF is all acting anyway!

Thu, 6 Jan 2005, 07:51 pm
Rose Cooper wrote:

> And Craig, you could only review what you saw when Judging
> that thing, so your point isn't really relevant to the issue
> at hand. You couldn't judge the whole thing, just the
> excerpts you saw.

Oh? I really thought that WAS the point? Whether or not you should be allowed to judge what you see...?


> Richard felt entitled to his opinion, and everyone who
> disputed his opinion also felt entitled to their's, but have
> been rapped over the knuckles for having their opinions about
> Richard's opinion (how is that fair?). No one was really
> arguing the negativity or positivity of his opinions, just
> the validity and relevance. An opinion is really only valid,
> if someone's absorption of a point is complete and
> comprehensive - otherwise it's mere speculation based on an
> undercooked understanding.
>

Whoa! Hang on!

On one hand, you say everyone should be entitled to their opinion, and that it should be fair for others to then have their own counter opinion.

On the other hand, you approve of someone deciding an opinion is not valid or relevant....therefore they should not be entitled to it ??

Aren't these completely contradictory philosophies..?


To disagree with the content (ie positivity or negativity, as you say) is a matter of taste; but to quote Thomas Jefferson, I think we should "defend to the death your right to say it".

That's all I've been saying all along. Whether anyone's content is right or wrong, I am in no position to judge, and hell, it's just an opinion. I may or may not have a differing opinion.

But as for allowing them to say it; I think that is a basic right...and WHETHER OR NOT the content is thought to be 'unfounded', they are still entitled to be heard.




Those two opposing viewpoints aside, I'm glad you wrote your article because it was very entertaining!

Cheers,
Craig

[%sig%]

Thread (52 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews