Richard III
Fri, 7 Nov 2003, 11:06 amWalter Plinge20 posts in thread
Richard III
Fri, 7 Nov 2003, 11:06 amWHAT: Richard III
WHEN: Thursday, November 6
WHERE: Nexus Theatre, Murdoch University, WA
"No-one else seems to have written a serious review of this production, so it falls to me to provide some hopefully useful feedback." :-)
I'll try and keep this short - there are only two performances left (tonight and tomorrow) so I haven't much time to push the show. I've said before that I'm not a Shakespeare aficionado. I have never read or seen Richard III and am only familiar with the story from what I've seen on Blackadder. I haven't even seen Richard I or Richard II, so I apologise for my confusion coming in at the end of the trilogy.
Nevertheless, I LOVED this production. I'll freely admit that, early on, I had no idea what was going on. It took quite a while to work out who was related to who, why such-and-such wanted so-and-so dead, and who was trying to bonk who. (Thanks for the excellent programme which helped somewhat.) However, the production was presented so entertainingly that little things like plot coherency didn't seem to matter.
As advertised, the production was performed in the style of a Bollywood Musical. At the drop of a hat, the cast would burst into huge production numbers - singing and dancing to mostly original (and extremely catchy) music. ENORMOUS congratulations to Musical Director Nick Choo. The choreography was clever and appropriate for the style, the acoustics were perfect, the set was lovely and the costumes were absolutely stunning - particular favourites included Kayti Fryer's backless dress, Kristan Smith's fetching suit, Dana Lisman's shimmering gown, Alexa Taylor's translucent frock and Melissa Merchant's dominatrix outfit. What? Don't look at me like that!
The tremendous liberties taken with the script may raise the hackles of some Shakespeare purists, but it's all done in good fun. It's quite rightly emphasised that the desire for power, and corruption therein, is just as relevant today (if not more so) as it was 400 years ago.
My vested interests? Apart from one close friend in the cast I don't know anyone involved with the production. I only went to the show because of my friend and I'm certainly glad I did. I paid for my tickets like everyone else and at $10 per head it's cheaper than most other shows and GREAT value. And how close a friend, you ask? Well, I COULD have gone and seen The Matrix Revolutions....
Like I said, I'm trying to keep this short, but this really was a tremendously entertaining production. All performances were fine and everyone got their moment in the spotlight. Special mention should go to Paul Grabovac who was obviously enjoying himself immensely as Dirty Dick. It's about 1 hr 45 mins long and has no interval. Thanks to director Serge Tampalini, and all involved, for a wonderful evening's entertainment. Two performances left!
JB
WHEN: Thursday, November 6
WHERE: Nexus Theatre, Murdoch University, WA
"No-one else seems to have written a serious review of this production, so it falls to me to provide some hopefully useful feedback." :-)
I'll try and keep this short - there are only two performances left (tonight and tomorrow) so I haven't much time to push the show. I've said before that I'm not a Shakespeare aficionado. I have never read or seen Richard III and am only familiar with the story from what I've seen on Blackadder. I haven't even seen Richard I or Richard II, so I apologise for my confusion coming in at the end of the trilogy.
Nevertheless, I LOVED this production. I'll freely admit that, early on, I had no idea what was going on. It took quite a while to work out who was related to who, why such-and-such wanted so-and-so dead, and who was trying to bonk who. (Thanks for the excellent programme which helped somewhat.) However, the production was presented so entertainingly that little things like plot coherency didn't seem to matter.
As advertised, the production was performed in the style of a Bollywood Musical. At the drop of a hat, the cast would burst into huge production numbers - singing and dancing to mostly original (and extremely catchy) music. ENORMOUS congratulations to Musical Director Nick Choo. The choreography was clever and appropriate for the style, the acoustics were perfect, the set was lovely and the costumes were absolutely stunning - particular favourites included Kayti Fryer's backless dress, Kristan Smith's fetching suit, Dana Lisman's shimmering gown, Alexa Taylor's translucent frock and Melissa Merchant's dominatrix outfit. What? Don't look at me like that!
The tremendous liberties taken with the script may raise the hackles of some Shakespeare purists, but it's all done in good fun. It's quite rightly emphasised that the desire for power, and corruption therein, is just as relevant today (if not more so) as it was 400 years ago.
My vested interests? Apart from one close friend in the cast I don't know anyone involved with the production. I only went to the show because of my friend and I'm certainly glad I did. I paid for my tickets like everyone else and at $10 per head it's cheaper than most other shows and GREAT value. And how close a friend, you ask? Well, I COULD have gone and seen The Matrix Revolutions....
Like I said, I'm trying to keep this short, but this really was a tremendously entertaining production. All performances were fine and everyone got their moment in the spotlight. Special mention should go to Paul Grabovac who was obviously enjoying himself immensely as Dirty Dick. It's about 1 hr 45 mins long and has no interval. Thanks to director Serge Tampalini, and all involved, for a wonderful evening's entertainment. Two performances left!
JB
Attack of the cultures...
Thu, 13 Nov 2003, 08:46 amWalter Plinge
crgwllms wrote:
"I don't really like the word "dude" either...one of those Americanisms that has invaded our culture via popular movies and has now assumed a level of meaning it doesn't really deserve, except as a measure of how desperately we want to align ourselves with that culture in favour of our own."
I think there are enough ockerisms in my vocabulary to allow one americanism in...
I don't know about anyone else, but I've always thought Australian culture appropriated left right and centre from every other culture that creeps past us. After all, aren't we one of the vanguards of Fusion cuisine.
Besides, I wonder how many of these people who bleat incessantly about preserving OUR culture are really talking about English culture rather than Australian culture.
[not pointing finger at you here, Craig, pointing it at other people who have not entered this discussion yet]
Allow me one Americanism
"I don't believe I've ever met a general, but I HAVE met with two WA Governor-Generals, and the Governor of a Japanese province, and I think if I had called any of them "dude" it would have displayed a different kind of ignorance."
Well... that depends entirely on the context doesn't it...
If you are meeting with them at a formal function, etc. Then dude would of course be totally inappropriate.
When they are sitting at your desk and you are doing work for them, and they are expecting you to treat them the same way you treat everyone else, of course I am going to call them dude, as I do everyone else.
And remember this being Australia, where we don't bow down and scrape to anyone, especially if they are also Australian. Mick didn't mind (and Marlena is a truly beautiful woman...)
"It was an amateur opinion, not attempting to be anything more than many others I read here."
Come on, it was a blatant Dorothy Dixer!
I dislike it when Stinger does it, I dislike it when anyone does it.
I just think if you are going to post a Dorothy Dix, you may as well disguise it.
Besides, the attack from Stinger was after I said that his review was not to be taken seriously, as no Dorothy Dixer ever should...
Paul "Ignorami" Treasure
"I don't really like the word "dude" either...one of those Americanisms that has invaded our culture via popular movies and has now assumed a level of meaning it doesn't really deserve, except as a measure of how desperately we want to align ourselves with that culture in favour of our own."
I think there are enough ockerisms in my vocabulary to allow one americanism in...
I don't know about anyone else, but I've always thought Australian culture appropriated left right and centre from every other culture that creeps past us. After all, aren't we one of the vanguards of Fusion cuisine.
Besides, I wonder how many of these people who bleat incessantly about preserving OUR culture are really talking about English culture rather than Australian culture.
[not pointing finger at you here, Craig, pointing it at other people who have not entered this discussion yet]
Allow me one Americanism
"I don't believe I've ever met a general, but I HAVE met with two WA Governor-Generals, and the Governor of a Japanese province, and I think if I had called any of them "dude" it would have displayed a different kind of ignorance."
Well... that depends entirely on the context doesn't it...
If you are meeting with them at a formal function, etc. Then dude would of course be totally inappropriate.
When they are sitting at your desk and you are doing work for them, and they are expecting you to treat them the same way you treat everyone else, of course I am going to call them dude, as I do everyone else.
And remember this being Australia, where we don't bow down and scrape to anyone, especially if they are also Australian. Mick didn't mind (and Marlena is a truly beautiful woman...)
"It was an amateur opinion, not attempting to be anything more than many others I read here."
Come on, it was a blatant Dorothy Dixer!
I dislike it when Stinger does it, I dislike it when anyone does it.
I just think if you are going to post a Dorothy Dix, you may as well disguise it.
Besides, the attack from Stinger was after I said that his review was not to be taken seriously, as no Dorothy Dixer ever should...
Paul "Ignorami" Treasure
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···