The Children's Hour
Wed, 25 June 2003, 12:27 amWalter Plinge6 posts in thread
The Children's Hour
Wed, 25 June 2003, 12:27 amHmmm, it's been a while since I've done this, let's see if I remember how it's done...
WHAT: The Children's Hour
WHEN: Saturday, June 21
WHERE: Stirling Theatre, Stirling (well, duh!), WA
From their own publicity, The Children's Hour is "A cautionary tale of how little lies can turn into big issues. A troublesome little girl at a boarding school fashions a story about two of the headmistresses. Her lie causes a major negative impact on the lives of these women."
To say the least. An alternative synopsis might have been, "What if Robert & Kathy Thorn raised a little girl?"
Miss Wright (Katrina Bonds) and Miss Dobie (Catriona Coe) own and run the Wright-Dobie School for Girls, an exclusive boarding school in England, 1934. The production opens on the school with an amusing scene from English teacher, Mrs “I’ve never missed a line in my life” Mortar (despite evidence to the contrary). Clare Wilson obviously had fun with the sanctimonious old biddy, and provided the comic relief for this very dark play. Some of her indignant shrieks got a bit high, and I might be tempted to warn her to be careful not to go too far over the top into caricature.
It is in this scene that we meet the sweet, innocent and lovely Mary Tilford, played by Alexandra York. When I say, “sweet, innocent and lovely”, I mean it in the same way as I might use to describe a Great White Pointer. Mary is a wicked little girl, not beyond using lies, blackmail and bullying to get her own way (truancy, usually). When she is challenged, she relies upon the timeworn strategy of feigning illness. When she absconds from school, heads home and is caught, she insists the two headmistresses are “out to get her” because she knows the headmistresses’ secret. Can we all say, “The love that dare not speak its name?”
Apparently this play was chosen because of the large number of roles for youngsters. I think there were 11 girls and one boy (standard ratio, really) and they were excellent. Stirling Theatre should be commended for their Youth Group and for staging a play where so many young actresses can participate. Congratulations to director Christine Ellis for rounding up such uniform talent, and well done to all the girls (and Brendan).
And of course, Alexandra. When she was good, she was very very good, and when she was bad she was horrid. One minute she was sweetness and light, the next she was pure evil. Some adult actors have trouble with this dichotomy, but Alexandra was a natural at switching back and forth. At interval, the audience were ready to lynch her. I imagine her parents would have to sit in the car outside the theatre with the engine running.
As much as the audience hated Mary, they adored her poor victim, Rosalie, played by Amy Stenning-Galloway. Rosalie was the “girl who didn’t fit in”. Mary discovered a secret and used it against Rosalie mercilessly. I know at least one audience member (TH) who wanted to just pick Rosalie up and take her home. Well done to both the girls.
Cassie Vagliviello had a bit part, but contributed otherwise by writing some bridging scenes for the play. Not only were these seamless with the original script, but also showcased the abilities of some of the other girls. I canÂ’t remember which were which, but they were all wonderful as snooty, upper-class, English boarding-school brats.
There was a LONG scene change between Act 1 and Act 2. A bit too long for my tastes, but it enabled the crew to totally transform the box set. Very impressive!
I should mention the adults, so that they donÂ’t sulk in the dressing room. Katrina & Catriona were lovely. I did think Act 1 was a bit talky and slow, but thatÂ’s often the case with Act 1 - it has to set the stage, introduce the characters, etc. If all the sex scenes were in Act 1, whoÂ’d come back after Interval? I really enjoyed CatrionaÂ’s performance. She seemed to have the meatier of the roles. She got more and more distraught as the lies escalated, and presented an emotionally powerful performance. Even more impressive when you consider (as I learned afterward) that English is not her first language!
Katrina was the more composed of the two - the rock of support. Well, she did have a boyfriend to fall back on. Peter Clark portrayed the jovial, calming Dr Cardin, a neutral role (ie: not a teacher) in MaryÂ’s eyes. He was also KatrinaÂ’s fiancé. However, when it mattered most, he let Katrina down. Katrina had a wonderful concluding scene - her eyes and body language speaking volumes, whilst saying nothing.
The wonderful Ann Barker played MaryÂ’s Grandmother. Believing sweet, innocent, lovely (like a shark, remember) Mary, Grandma sets into motion events that will ruin the school and everyone in it. ItÂ’s hard to hate the wonderful Ann Barker, but weÂ’ll certainly give it our best. :-)
On a personal note, I was a bit disappointed with the programme. I do like to see cast bios, but this programme was sadly lacking them. I realise that much of the cast, at such a young age, may not have much experience behind them (although that's certainly not evident from their performances) but even a couple of lines would have been better than nothing.
And, since it is expected of me, I must say it was nice to see authentic-looking hosiery on the adults (except for Peter, whose was hidden beneath his trousers). They may not have been fully fashioned, and they may only have been pantihose with seams drawn up the back, but it's the thought that counts.
Geez, another tome. In summary: A bit slow to start but builds to a powerful climax. It doesn't beat you about the head with its important messages, either. Some wonderful performances from young actresses and adults alike. Thanks Stirling Players.
JB
Walter PlingeWed, 25 June 2003, 12:27 am
Hmmm, it's been a while since I've done this, let's see if I remember how it's done...
WHAT: The Children's Hour
WHEN: Saturday, June 21
WHERE: Stirling Theatre, Stirling (well, duh!), WA
From their own publicity, The Children's Hour is "A cautionary tale of how little lies can turn into big issues. A troublesome little girl at a boarding school fashions a story about two of the headmistresses. Her lie causes a major negative impact on the lives of these women."
To say the least. An alternative synopsis might have been, "What if Robert & Kathy Thorn raised a little girl?"
Miss Wright (Katrina Bonds) and Miss Dobie (Catriona Coe) own and run the Wright-Dobie School for Girls, an exclusive boarding school in England, 1934. The production opens on the school with an amusing scene from English teacher, Mrs “I’ve never missed a line in my life” Mortar (despite evidence to the contrary). Clare Wilson obviously had fun with the sanctimonious old biddy, and provided the comic relief for this very dark play. Some of her indignant shrieks got a bit high, and I might be tempted to warn her to be careful not to go too far over the top into caricature.
It is in this scene that we meet the sweet, innocent and lovely Mary Tilford, played by Alexandra York. When I say, “sweet, innocent and lovely”, I mean it in the same way as I might use to describe a Great White Pointer. Mary is a wicked little girl, not beyond using lies, blackmail and bullying to get her own way (truancy, usually). When she is challenged, she relies upon the timeworn strategy of feigning illness. When she absconds from school, heads home and is caught, she insists the two headmistresses are “out to get her” because she knows the headmistresses’ secret. Can we all say, “The love that dare not speak its name?”
Apparently this play was chosen because of the large number of roles for youngsters. I think there were 11 girls and one boy (standard ratio, really) and they were excellent. Stirling Theatre should be commended for their Youth Group and for staging a play where so many young actresses can participate. Congratulations to director Christine Ellis for rounding up such uniform talent, and well done to all the girls (and Brendan).
And of course, Alexandra. When she was good, she was very very good, and when she was bad she was horrid. One minute she was sweetness and light, the next she was pure evil. Some adult actors have trouble with this dichotomy, but Alexandra was a natural at switching back and forth. At interval, the audience were ready to lynch her. I imagine her parents would have to sit in the car outside the theatre with the engine running.
As much as the audience hated Mary, they adored her poor victim, Rosalie, played by Amy Stenning-Galloway. Rosalie was the “girl who didn’t fit in”. Mary discovered a secret and used it against Rosalie mercilessly. I know at least one audience member (TH) who wanted to just pick Rosalie up and take her home. Well done to both the girls.
Cassie Vagliviello had a bit part, but contributed otherwise by writing some bridging scenes for the play. Not only were these seamless with the original script, but also showcased the abilities of some of the other girls. I canÂ’t remember which were which, but they were all wonderful as snooty, upper-class, English boarding-school brats.
There was a LONG scene change between Act 1 and Act 2. A bit too long for my tastes, but it enabled the crew to totally transform the box set. Very impressive!
I should mention the adults, so that they donÂ’t sulk in the dressing room. Katrina & Catriona were lovely. I did think Act 1 was a bit talky and slow, but thatÂ’s often the case with Act 1 - it has to set the stage, introduce the characters, etc. If all the sex scenes were in Act 1, whoÂ’d come back after Interval? I really enjoyed CatrionaÂ’s performance. She seemed to have the meatier of the roles. She got more and more distraught as the lies escalated, and presented an emotionally powerful performance. Even more impressive when you consider (as I learned afterward) that English is not her first language!
Katrina was the more composed of the two - the rock of support. Well, she did have a boyfriend to fall back on. Peter Clark portrayed the jovial, calming Dr Cardin, a neutral role (ie: not a teacher) in MaryÂ’s eyes. He was also KatrinaÂ’s fiancé. However, when it mattered most, he let Katrina down. Katrina had a wonderful concluding scene - her eyes and body language speaking volumes, whilst saying nothing.
The wonderful Ann Barker played MaryÂ’s Grandmother. Believing sweet, innocent, lovely (like a shark, remember) Mary, Grandma sets into motion events that will ruin the school and everyone in it. ItÂ’s hard to hate the wonderful Ann Barker, but weÂ’ll certainly give it our best. :-)
On a personal note, I was a bit disappointed with the programme. I do like to see cast bios, but this programme was sadly lacking them. I realise that much of the cast, at such a young age, may not have much experience behind them (although that's certainly not evident from their performances) but even a couple of lines would have been better than nothing.
And, since it is expected of me, I must say it was nice to see authentic-looking hosiery on the adults (except for Peter, whose was hidden beneath his trousers). They may not have been fully fashioned, and they may only have been pantihose with seams drawn up the back, but it's the thought that counts.
Geez, another tome. In summary: A bit slow to start but builds to a powerful climax. It doesn't beat you about the head with its important messages, either. Some wonderful performances from young actresses and adults alike. Thanks Stirling Players.
JB
Walter PlingeWed, 25 June 2003, 09:04 am
Re: The Children's Hour
Jarrod Buttery wrote:
"...an exclusive boarding school in England, 1934."
"...but they were all wonderful as snooty, upper-class, English boarding-school brats."
England?
Why the change of scene to England?
The play was originally set in NEW England from memory
(New York state or Pennsylvania or Maine or somewhere like that)
So, any idea why they changed it?
If it was because of the American accents, why didn't they just change it to Australia?
We had Boarding Schools back then too, you know.
Don't think something like that can't happen here, cos it has!
Anyone remember the case about fifteen/twenty years ago where a female teacher was sacked from Kent Street High School (I think it was) because one of the female students said that she'd made a pass at her. And then it turned out that the girl in question had made the story up to get rid of the teacher because she'd given her detention!
If anyone out there could tell us why they changed the setting I would be interested.
Well done Stirling for tackling such an important piece of American Literature.
"I will not cut the cloth of my conscience to match this year's fashions"
Lillian Hellman, in answer to a question by Senator Joe McCarthy at the House Un-American Activities Committee.
The woman is a personal hero of mine.
Paul Treasure
"...an exclusive boarding school in England, 1934."
"...but they were all wonderful as snooty, upper-class, English boarding-school brats."
England?
Why the change of scene to England?
The play was originally set in NEW England from memory
(New York state or Pennsylvania or Maine or somewhere like that)
So, any idea why they changed it?
If it was because of the American accents, why didn't they just change it to Australia?
We had Boarding Schools back then too, you know.
Don't think something like that can't happen here, cos it has!
Anyone remember the case about fifteen/twenty years ago where a female teacher was sacked from Kent Street High School (I think it was) because one of the female students said that she'd made a pass at her. And then it turned out that the girl in question had made the story up to get rid of the teacher because she'd given her detention!
If anyone out there could tell us why they changed the setting I would be interested.
Well done Stirling for tackling such an important piece of American Literature.
"I will not cut the cloth of my conscience to match this year's fashions"
Lillian Hellman, in answer to a question by Senator Joe McCarthy at the House Un-American Activities Committee.
The woman is a personal hero of mine.
Paul Treasure
Walter PlingeWed, 25 June 2003, 09:26 am
Re: The Children's Hour
Congratulations, Paul! You were the first person to pick up my deliberate mistake!
Oops, I'll take the fall for that one. Sorry, Stirling.
JB
Oops, I'll take the fall for that one. Sorry, Stirling.
JB
Walter PlingeWed, 25 June 2003, 11:43 am
Re: The Children's Hour
Thanks for the detailed reveiw Jarrod - good to meet with yourself and friends after the show. Pleased you enjoyed it.
I will be keeping my authentic-looking hosiery, after the show has finished (the ones you mentioned were hidden beneath my trousers). If you give me your address I'll post them to you (unwashed ofcourse) as requested. Enjoy !
PC
I will be keeping my authentic-looking hosiery, after the show has finished (the ones you mentioned were hidden beneath my trousers). If you give me your address I'll post them to you (unwashed ofcourse) as requested. Enjoy !
PC
Walter PlingeFri, 27 June 2003, 05:29 pm
Re: The Children's Hour
Yes, Paul.
We changed the setting from America originally because we didn't want a whole range of "hollywood style fake american accents".
When it was discovered that 75% of the cast spoke with english accents, it seemed natural to set it in England!
It could have worked just as well set in Australia, but it seemed more sensible to utilize the english accents which already existed within the cast.
It's not too late to come and see the show. It is on tonight and tomorrow night at the Stirling Theatre, morris place, Innaloo.
Thank you Jarrod for the great review!
The whole cast thoroughly enjoyed putting on this show.
Cheers,
Christine
We changed the setting from America originally because we didn't want a whole range of "hollywood style fake american accents".
When it was discovered that 75% of the cast spoke with english accents, it seemed natural to set it in England!
It could have worked just as well set in Australia, but it seemed more sensible to utilize the english accents which already existed within the cast.
It's not too late to come and see the show. It is on tonight and tomorrow night at the Stirling Theatre, morris place, Innaloo.
Thank you Jarrod for the great review!
The whole cast thoroughly enjoyed putting on this show.
Cheers,
Christine
Walter PlingeWed, 2 July 2003, 12:43 pm
Re: The Children's Hour
Re: The Childrens Hour
My friends and I absolutely loved this show on Saturday night. I thought the sets, and the acting were all wonderful, and was so impressed by the young adolescent actors. I thought that Mrs Amelia Tilford was outstanding in her portrayal. It was indeed a tragic story for its time, with a really good moral.
Thanks so much for providing a great night's entertainment. Well done Christine, all the cast and crew.
Josephine
My friends and I absolutely loved this show on Saturday night. I thought the sets, and the acting were all wonderful, and was so impressed by the young adolescent actors. I thought that Mrs Amelia Tilford was outstanding in her portrayal. It was indeed a tragic story for its time, with a really good moral.
Thanks so much for providing a great night's entertainment. Well done Christine, all the cast and crew.
Josephine