Les Mis
Tue, 16 Oct 2001, 01:00 amWalter Plinge29 posts in thread
Les Mis
Tue, 16 Oct 2001, 01:00 amHey, I got to see Les Mis! Currently at The Regal Theatre (Subiaco, WA) starring a cast of thousands. God forgive me for opening the floodgates on THIS messageboard too....
As I understand it, Volvos have their side lights permanently hardwired so that they're always on during Scandinavian fogginess. The tradeoff we make for this is that their indicators never work.
Musicals are like Volvos. Expensive, boxy and driven by dickheads..... no. sorry. What I meant was, you get some toe-tappin' songs, some lovely frocks, but seemingly, more often than not, you sacrifice a believable plot.
That's okay, I actually really liked it - me - Mr "I don't like musicals". Just goes to show, the best trick to pull off is to convince someone to like something that they didn't think they would. You're got a head start if you've got a great cast like this.
I'll admit, I was partly interested because I don't know anything about it (except that some French people get killed, so there's THAT going for it), it's famous, and I wanted to see what it's all about. But the main reason I wanted to go was to see some friends who are in it.
The lights went down and the voiceover began to tell us who would play which role. This was all new to me. Apparently just about every character is played alternately by two or more different actors. I don't know why this is. Is it to give more people a go? Is it to spread the load? Is it a safety net? Does more actors encourage more ticket-buying family members? ;-) No, really, I'm interested to know - anyone got answers?
The voiceover rattled off names I wasn't familiar with. "Wait! Who's playing what? What was that last name? Where's my programme? Damn it's too dark to read. Who was that? They didn't mention Gill - I thought Gill was in this performance?" Then there was the obligatory requests for no photography and to please turn off all mobile phones. Although, I'd be tempted to give serious consideration to expanding this to include, "And please keep your @!#$ kids under control." Geez, if they weren't screaming they were bouncing on the seats or running up and down the aisles. Well, as I said earlier, there's always a tradeoff - encourage the general public to turn up and you get the odd disgraceful parent who doesn't give a damn.
I am enormously pleased to say that Gillian Binks (Eponine) was indeed in the production. Just about every member of the chorus (all of whom had the opportunity to sing a few solo bars) had good voices, but Gill just blew me away. Everyone else was so good, and yet she STILL stood out. She got shot, she was lying bunched up in a crumpled heap, yet she STILL clearly belted out every word of her solo! Apart from the two male leads, Gill deservedly received the biggest roar from the audience during the curtain call.
Speaking of the two male leads, Geez they were good. I'm guessing from the little photos in the programme that Justin Freind played Jean Valjean and David Dockery played Javert. Jean Valjean is a nice guy caught up in bad times and has resorted to desperate measures. Does anyone need me to tell them that, after serving 19 years for stealing a loaf of bread for his starving family, he is released, only to find himself ostracized by society as an ex-con? He breaks parole, runs away and has Captain Ahab, sorry, policeman Javert, chase him evermore.
Justin brought sympathy and strength, and dignified and believable ageing to the role, and never faltered. Mightily impressed. David Dockery's pursuit of the white whale was really quite scary in its intensity. Ahab is a more "in your face" character, but weaker in comparison to Jean who is more three-dimensional. Only at the end does Ahab see his folly. David stalked about the stage slightly over the top at times, but God he has a great voice. Every word, every syllable was unquestionably strong and clear. Near the end of Act 1, he was singing against the male chorus, and you STILL heard every word. Alongside Gill's beautiful solo, the highlight of this production was the scene where Jean and Ahab sung at each other simultaneously. (There's probably a technical term for that.) Two different songs, two different rhythms, two different voices, yet each was clear. Just two guys on the thrust in spotlights. Even I, with no musical bones in my body, could appreciate how well done this was.
Amanda Chesterton, whose talent is only matched by her cleavage, was an absolute scream as Mrs Thenardier. She and the hubbie ran away with just about all of the laughs (though I thought I heard Meadows chuckling when the little kid got shot) and earned a chunk of the audience's sympathies, despite playing reprehensible characters. Their roles are obviously essential in every production considering how unhappy everyone else is, and they did a damn good job with timing and diction. Another bonus on their side is they get to sing "Master of the House." Even I know of this song, though can't help thinking of George Costanza unable to get it out of his head (which just makes it all the more funny....)
I also liked the guy who played the leader of the guys who decide to build a barricade. Good presence and voice, although didn't quite reach the high note. Maybe it was a bad day. I managed to pick out the strong voices of Hayley Binks and Amelia Christo in the chorus. Good to see Adam McGurk with an Enormous Pistol. Young Cosette was very good - a very clear voice for someone so young. Older Cosette had a beautiful super-high soprano voice. Very impressive, but it was so high I couldn't always make out what she was singing.
Overall, the girls were better than the men (sorry guys). I was a bit disappointed with the barricade scene. It was indeed a lovely barricade, but I couldn't always follow what the hell was happening. Too many male voices, too many gunshots, the orchestra was going for eleven and I thought a lot of that scene got lost.
The orchestra did occasionally drown out some of the weaker voices, and there were very definitely problems with the mikes, too. On rare occasions they cut out completely. I'd be pissed if I was paying an arm and a leg for that.
Sets and costumes were lovely. I mentioned the great barricade, but the backdrop and the flying gate were great (no six-inch Stonehenge here). Just a couple of points - garters were designed to hold up stockings, not just as decoration for tights. And if someone did a PLAY about the French Revolution. and put big bloody castors on the bottom of every bench and table, they'd get crucified for the anachronism. Interesting how there are different standards for musicals and plays! I did think a bit of effort could have been made to put the table legs with castors upstage, rather than facing the audience. Yes, yes, Mr Bloody Pedantic....
Christ, look at the time! Better wrap this up. It's a most enjoyable show if you can afford it. Tons of onstage talent - too many to mention. It has been compared very favourably (by someone who would know) to the production at the Maj. Thank you so very much to the wonderful friend who gave me comps - I wouldn't have been able to get there otherwise. If you ARE going, I'd suggest you get there EARLY. There was a massive cock-up with the tickets on Sunday. Two whole rows had been double booked and there were a lot of unhappy patrons. If any of the cast were wondering why it started twenty minutes late....
JB
As I understand it, Volvos have their side lights permanently hardwired so that they're always on during Scandinavian fogginess. The tradeoff we make for this is that their indicators never work.
Musicals are like Volvos. Expensive, boxy and driven by dickheads..... no. sorry. What I meant was, you get some toe-tappin' songs, some lovely frocks, but seemingly, more often than not, you sacrifice a believable plot.
That's okay, I actually really liked it - me - Mr "I don't like musicals". Just goes to show, the best trick to pull off is to convince someone to like something that they didn't think they would. You're got a head start if you've got a great cast like this.
I'll admit, I was partly interested because I don't know anything about it (except that some French people get killed, so there's THAT going for it), it's famous, and I wanted to see what it's all about. But the main reason I wanted to go was to see some friends who are in it.
The lights went down and the voiceover began to tell us who would play which role. This was all new to me. Apparently just about every character is played alternately by two or more different actors. I don't know why this is. Is it to give more people a go? Is it to spread the load? Is it a safety net? Does more actors encourage more ticket-buying family members? ;-) No, really, I'm interested to know - anyone got answers?
The voiceover rattled off names I wasn't familiar with. "Wait! Who's playing what? What was that last name? Where's my programme? Damn it's too dark to read. Who was that? They didn't mention Gill - I thought Gill was in this performance?" Then there was the obligatory requests for no photography and to please turn off all mobile phones. Although, I'd be tempted to give serious consideration to expanding this to include, "And please keep your @!#$ kids under control." Geez, if they weren't screaming they were bouncing on the seats or running up and down the aisles. Well, as I said earlier, there's always a tradeoff - encourage the general public to turn up and you get the odd disgraceful parent who doesn't give a damn.
I am enormously pleased to say that Gillian Binks (Eponine) was indeed in the production. Just about every member of the chorus (all of whom had the opportunity to sing a few solo bars) had good voices, but Gill just blew me away. Everyone else was so good, and yet she STILL stood out. She got shot, she was lying bunched up in a crumpled heap, yet she STILL clearly belted out every word of her solo! Apart from the two male leads, Gill deservedly received the biggest roar from the audience during the curtain call.
Speaking of the two male leads, Geez they were good. I'm guessing from the little photos in the programme that Justin Freind played Jean Valjean and David Dockery played Javert. Jean Valjean is a nice guy caught up in bad times and has resorted to desperate measures. Does anyone need me to tell them that, after serving 19 years for stealing a loaf of bread for his starving family, he is released, only to find himself ostracized by society as an ex-con? He breaks parole, runs away and has Captain Ahab, sorry, policeman Javert, chase him evermore.
Justin brought sympathy and strength, and dignified and believable ageing to the role, and never faltered. Mightily impressed. David Dockery's pursuit of the white whale was really quite scary in its intensity. Ahab is a more "in your face" character, but weaker in comparison to Jean who is more three-dimensional. Only at the end does Ahab see his folly. David stalked about the stage slightly over the top at times, but God he has a great voice. Every word, every syllable was unquestionably strong and clear. Near the end of Act 1, he was singing against the male chorus, and you STILL heard every word. Alongside Gill's beautiful solo, the highlight of this production was the scene where Jean and Ahab sung at each other simultaneously. (There's probably a technical term for that.) Two different songs, two different rhythms, two different voices, yet each was clear. Just two guys on the thrust in spotlights. Even I, with no musical bones in my body, could appreciate how well done this was.
Amanda Chesterton, whose talent is only matched by her cleavage, was an absolute scream as Mrs Thenardier. She and the hubbie ran away with just about all of the laughs (though I thought I heard Meadows chuckling when the little kid got shot) and earned a chunk of the audience's sympathies, despite playing reprehensible characters. Their roles are obviously essential in every production considering how unhappy everyone else is, and they did a damn good job with timing and diction. Another bonus on their side is they get to sing "Master of the House." Even I know of this song, though can't help thinking of George Costanza unable to get it out of his head (which just makes it all the more funny....)
I also liked the guy who played the leader of the guys who decide to build a barricade. Good presence and voice, although didn't quite reach the high note. Maybe it was a bad day. I managed to pick out the strong voices of Hayley Binks and Amelia Christo in the chorus. Good to see Adam McGurk with an Enormous Pistol. Young Cosette was very good - a very clear voice for someone so young. Older Cosette had a beautiful super-high soprano voice. Very impressive, but it was so high I couldn't always make out what she was singing.
Overall, the girls were better than the men (sorry guys). I was a bit disappointed with the barricade scene. It was indeed a lovely barricade, but I couldn't always follow what the hell was happening. Too many male voices, too many gunshots, the orchestra was going for eleven and I thought a lot of that scene got lost.
The orchestra did occasionally drown out some of the weaker voices, and there were very definitely problems with the mikes, too. On rare occasions they cut out completely. I'd be pissed if I was paying an arm and a leg for that.
Sets and costumes were lovely. I mentioned the great barricade, but the backdrop and the flying gate were great (no six-inch Stonehenge here). Just a couple of points - garters were designed to hold up stockings, not just as decoration for tights. And if someone did a PLAY about the French Revolution. and put big bloody castors on the bottom of every bench and table, they'd get crucified for the anachronism. Interesting how there are different standards for musicals and plays! I did think a bit of effort could have been made to put the table legs with castors upstage, rather than facing the audience. Yes, yes, Mr Bloody Pedantic....
Christ, look at the time! Better wrap this up. It's a most enjoyable show if you can afford it. Tons of onstage talent - too many to mention. It has been compared very favourably (by someone who would know) to the production at the Maj. Thank you so very much to the wonderful friend who gave me comps - I wouldn't have been able to get there otherwise. If you ARE going, I'd suggest you get there EARLY. There was a massive cock-up with the tickets on Sunday. Two whole rows had been double booked and there were a lot of unhappy patrons. If any of the cast were wondering why it started twenty minutes late....
JB
Walter PlingeTue, 16 Oct 2001, 01:00 am
Hey, I got to see Les Mis! Currently at The Regal Theatre (Subiaco, WA) starring a cast of thousands. God forgive me for opening the floodgates on THIS messageboard too....
As I understand it, Volvos have their side lights permanently hardwired so that they're always on during Scandinavian fogginess. The tradeoff we make for this is that their indicators never work.
Musicals are like Volvos. Expensive, boxy and driven by dickheads..... no. sorry. What I meant was, you get some toe-tappin' songs, some lovely frocks, but seemingly, more often than not, you sacrifice a believable plot.
That's okay, I actually really liked it - me - Mr "I don't like musicals". Just goes to show, the best trick to pull off is to convince someone to like something that they didn't think they would. You're got a head start if you've got a great cast like this.
I'll admit, I was partly interested because I don't know anything about it (except that some French people get killed, so there's THAT going for it), it's famous, and I wanted to see what it's all about. But the main reason I wanted to go was to see some friends who are in it.
The lights went down and the voiceover began to tell us who would play which role. This was all new to me. Apparently just about every character is played alternately by two or more different actors. I don't know why this is. Is it to give more people a go? Is it to spread the load? Is it a safety net? Does more actors encourage more ticket-buying family members? ;-) No, really, I'm interested to know - anyone got answers?
The voiceover rattled off names I wasn't familiar with. "Wait! Who's playing what? What was that last name? Where's my programme? Damn it's too dark to read. Who was that? They didn't mention Gill - I thought Gill was in this performance?" Then there was the obligatory requests for no photography and to please turn off all mobile phones. Although, I'd be tempted to give serious consideration to expanding this to include, "And please keep your @!#$ kids under control." Geez, if they weren't screaming they were bouncing on the seats or running up and down the aisles. Well, as I said earlier, there's always a tradeoff - encourage the general public to turn up and you get the odd disgraceful parent who doesn't give a damn.
I am enormously pleased to say that Gillian Binks (Eponine) was indeed in the production. Just about every member of the chorus (all of whom had the opportunity to sing a few solo bars) had good voices, but Gill just blew me away. Everyone else was so good, and yet she STILL stood out. She got shot, she was lying bunched up in a crumpled heap, yet she STILL clearly belted out every word of her solo! Apart from the two male leads, Gill deservedly received the biggest roar from the audience during the curtain call.
Speaking of the two male leads, Geez they were good. I'm guessing from the little photos in the programme that Justin Freind played Jean Valjean and David Dockery played Javert. Jean Valjean is a nice guy caught up in bad times and has resorted to desperate measures. Does anyone need me to tell them that, after serving 19 years for stealing a loaf of bread for his starving family, he is released, only to find himself ostracized by society as an ex-con? He breaks parole, runs away and has Captain Ahab, sorry, policeman Javert, chase him evermore.
Justin brought sympathy and strength, and dignified and believable ageing to the role, and never faltered. Mightily impressed. David Dockery's pursuit of the white whale was really quite scary in its intensity. Ahab is a more "in your face" character, but weaker in comparison to Jean who is more three-dimensional. Only at the end does Ahab see his folly. David stalked about the stage slightly over the top at times, but God he has a great voice. Every word, every syllable was unquestionably strong and clear. Near the end of Act 1, he was singing against the male chorus, and you STILL heard every word. Alongside Gill's beautiful solo, the highlight of this production was the scene where Jean and Ahab sung at each other simultaneously. (There's probably a technical term for that.) Two different songs, two different rhythms, two different voices, yet each was clear. Just two guys on the thrust in spotlights. Even I, with no musical bones in my body, could appreciate how well done this was.
Amanda Chesterton, whose talent is only matched by her cleavage, was an absolute scream as Mrs Thenardier. She and the hubbie ran away with just about all of the laughs (though I thought I heard Meadows chuckling when the little kid got shot) and earned a chunk of the audience's sympathies, despite playing reprehensible characters. Their roles are obviously essential in every production considering how unhappy everyone else is, and they did a damn good job with timing and diction. Another bonus on their side is they get to sing "Master of the House." Even I know of this song, though can't help thinking of George Costanza unable to get it out of his head (which just makes it all the more funny....)
I also liked the guy who played the leader of the guys who decide to build a barricade. Good presence and voice, although didn't quite reach the high note. Maybe it was a bad day. I managed to pick out the strong voices of Hayley Binks and Amelia Christo in the chorus. Good to see Adam McGurk with an Enormous Pistol. Young Cosette was very good - a very clear voice for someone so young. Older Cosette had a beautiful super-high soprano voice. Very impressive, but it was so high I couldn't always make out what she was singing.
Overall, the girls were better than the men (sorry guys). I was a bit disappointed with the barricade scene. It was indeed a lovely barricade, but I couldn't always follow what the hell was happening. Too many male voices, too many gunshots, the orchestra was going for eleven and I thought a lot of that scene got lost.
The orchestra did occasionally drown out some of the weaker voices, and there were very definitely problems with the mikes, too. On rare occasions they cut out completely. I'd be pissed if I was paying an arm and a leg for that.
Sets and costumes were lovely. I mentioned the great barricade, but the backdrop and the flying gate were great (no six-inch Stonehenge here). Just a couple of points - garters were designed to hold up stockings, not just as decoration for tights. And if someone did a PLAY about the French Revolution. and put big bloody castors on the bottom of every bench and table, they'd get crucified for the anachronism. Interesting how there are different standards for musicals and plays! I did think a bit of effort could have been made to put the table legs with castors upstage, rather than facing the audience. Yes, yes, Mr Bloody Pedantic....
Christ, look at the time! Better wrap this up. It's a most enjoyable show if you can afford it. Tons of onstage talent - too many to mention. It has been compared very favourably (by someone who would know) to the production at the Maj. Thank you so very much to the wonderful friend who gave me comps - I wouldn't have been able to get there otherwise. If you ARE going, I'd suggest you get there EARLY. There was a massive cock-up with the tickets on Sunday. Two whole rows had been double booked and there were a lot of unhappy patrons. If any of the cast were wondering why it started twenty minutes late....
JB
As I understand it, Volvos have their side lights permanently hardwired so that they're always on during Scandinavian fogginess. The tradeoff we make for this is that their indicators never work.
Musicals are like Volvos. Expensive, boxy and driven by dickheads..... no. sorry. What I meant was, you get some toe-tappin' songs, some lovely frocks, but seemingly, more often than not, you sacrifice a believable plot.
That's okay, I actually really liked it - me - Mr "I don't like musicals". Just goes to show, the best trick to pull off is to convince someone to like something that they didn't think they would. You're got a head start if you've got a great cast like this.
I'll admit, I was partly interested because I don't know anything about it (except that some French people get killed, so there's THAT going for it), it's famous, and I wanted to see what it's all about. But the main reason I wanted to go was to see some friends who are in it.
The lights went down and the voiceover began to tell us who would play which role. This was all new to me. Apparently just about every character is played alternately by two or more different actors. I don't know why this is. Is it to give more people a go? Is it to spread the load? Is it a safety net? Does more actors encourage more ticket-buying family members? ;-) No, really, I'm interested to know - anyone got answers?
The voiceover rattled off names I wasn't familiar with. "Wait! Who's playing what? What was that last name? Where's my programme? Damn it's too dark to read. Who was that? They didn't mention Gill - I thought Gill was in this performance?" Then there was the obligatory requests for no photography and to please turn off all mobile phones. Although, I'd be tempted to give serious consideration to expanding this to include, "And please keep your @!#$ kids under control." Geez, if they weren't screaming they were bouncing on the seats or running up and down the aisles. Well, as I said earlier, there's always a tradeoff - encourage the general public to turn up and you get the odd disgraceful parent who doesn't give a damn.
I am enormously pleased to say that Gillian Binks (Eponine) was indeed in the production. Just about every member of the chorus (all of whom had the opportunity to sing a few solo bars) had good voices, but Gill just blew me away. Everyone else was so good, and yet she STILL stood out. She got shot, she was lying bunched up in a crumpled heap, yet she STILL clearly belted out every word of her solo! Apart from the two male leads, Gill deservedly received the biggest roar from the audience during the curtain call.
Speaking of the two male leads, Geez they were good. I'm guessing from the little photos in the programme that Justin Freind played Jean Valjean and David Dockery played Javert. Jean Valjean is a nice guy caught up in bad times and has resorted to desperate measures. Does anyone need me to tell them that, after serving 19 years for stealing a loaf of bread for his starving family, he is released, only to find himself ostracized by society as an ex-con? He breaks parole, runs away and has Captain Ahab, sorry, policeman Javert, chase him evermore.
Justin brought sympathy and strength, and dignified and believable ageing to the role, and never faltered. Mightily impressed. David Dockery's pursuit of the white whale was really quite scary in its intensity. Ahab is a more "in your face" character, but weaker in comparison to Jean who is more three-dimensional. Only at the end does Ahab see his folly. David stalked about the stage slightly over the top at times, but God he has a great voice. Every word, every syllable was unquestionably strong and clear. Near the end of Act 1, he was singing against the male chorus, and you STILL heard every word. Alongside Gill's beautiful solo, the highlight of this production was the scene where Jean and Ahab sung at each other simultaneously. (There's probably a technical term for that.) Two different songs, two different rhythms, two different voices, yet each was clear. Just two guys on the thrust in spotlights. Even I, with no musical bones in my body, could appreciate how well done this was.
Amanda Chesterton, whose talent is only matched by her cleavage, was an absolute scream as Mrs Thenardier. She and the hubbie ran away with just about all of the laughs (though I thought I heard Meadows chuckling when the little kid got shot) and earned a chunk of the audience's sympathies, despite playing reprehensible characters. Their roles are obviously essential in every production considering how unhappy everyone else is, and they did a damn good job with timing and diction. Another bonus on their side is they get to sing "Master of the House." Even I know of this song, though can't help thinking of George Costanza unable to get it out of his head (which just makes it all the more funny....)
I also liked the guy who played the leader of the guys who decide to build a barricade. Good presence and voice, although didn't quite reach the high note. Maybe it was a bad day. I managed to pick out the strong voices of Hayley Binks and Amelia Christo in the chorus. Good to see Adam McGurk with an Enormous Pistol. Young Cosette was very good - a very clear voice for someone so young. Older Cosette had a beautiful super-high soprano voice. Very impressive, but it was so high I couldn't always make out what she was singing.
Overall, the girls were better than the men (sorry guys). I was a bit disappointed with the barricade scene. It was indeed a lovely barricade, but I couldn't always follow what the hell was happening. Too many male voices, too many gunshots, the orchestra was going for eleven and I thought a lot of that scene got lost.
The orchestra did occasionally drown out some of the weaker voices, and there were very definitely problems with the mikes, too. On rare occasions they cut out completely. I'd be pissed if I was paying an arm and a leg for that.
Sets and costumes were lovely. I mentioned the great barricade, but the backdrop and the flying gate were great (no six-inch Stonehenge here). Just a couple of points - garters were designed to hold up stockings, not just as decoration for tights. And if someone did a PLAY about the French Revolution. and put big bloody castors on the bottom of every bench and table, they'd get crucified for the anachronism. Interesting how there are different standards for musicals and plays! I did think a bit of effort could have been made to put the table legs with castors upstage, rather than facing the audience. Yes, yes, Mr Bloody Pedantic....
Christ, look at the time! Better wrap this up. It's a most enjoyable show if you can afford it. Tons of onstage talent - too many to mention. It has been compared very favourably (by someone who would know) to the production at the Maj. Thank you so very much to the wonderful friend who gave me comps - I wouldn't have been able to get there otherwise. If you ARE going, I'd suggest you get there EARLY. There was a massive cock-up with the tickets on Sunday. Two whole rows had been double booked and there were a lot of unhappy patrons. If any of the cast were wondering why it started twenty minutes late....
JB
Walter PlingeTue, 16 Oct 2001, 07:51 am
RE: Les Mis - not really a review
well, i went on the 12th, as a birthday pressie, and i thought it was great.
at least jarrod dodnt have a lady sitting next to him commentating the whole bloody thing!
"oh isn't that sad"
"ohhhh, wasnt that lovely"
"ooo - they sang the wrong note..."
"ooo, isnt this goood..."
thats what i had to put up with.
when the kid died (ok - i cant speel his name), all i could hear was this lady BEHiND me bawling her eyes out! and, like, she was really really crying!
really, i thought it was great!(other then people talking through the whole thing) i couldn t stop laughing at u Amanda!
i particually enjoyed 'stars' and 'on my own'. they have always been my faves, and they were done beautifuly!
at least jarrod dodnt have a lady sitting next to him commentating the whole bloody thing!
"oh isn't that sad"
"ohhhh, wasnt that lovely"
"ooo - they sang the wrong note..."
"ooo, isnt this goood..."
thats what i had to put up with.
when the kid died (ok - i cant speel his name), all i could hear was this lady BEHiND me bawling her eyes out! and, like, she was really really crying!
really, i thought it was great!(other then people talking through the whole thing) i couldn t stop laughing at u Amanda!
i particually enjoyed 'stars' and 'on my own'. they have always been my faves, and they were done beautifuly!
Walter PlingeTue, 16 Oct 2001, 09:03 am
RE: Les Mis - not really a review
Well Amanda it is fortunate it was only the kid's name you couldn't speel, because if you dodnt speel Jarrod's name correctly and wrote it as Jarrad, he would be particually pissed.
Apart from that, it was beautifuly written.
And by the way La Buttery, it is below me to respond to all the jibes you have been posting about me, but I would like to let you know that the "technical" term you were searching for in your review of "Unhappy Lesbians" describing "two people singing at each other" is........... "duet".
Thou pribbling sheep-biting death-token!
(My first use of the "Insult" button and I've gotta say, I reckon it's a winner. How it so aptly summed up JB is beyond me - as most things to do with computers are.)
Apart from that, it was beautifuly written.
And by the way La Buttery, it is below me to respond to all the jibes you have been posting about me, but I would like to let you know that the "technical" term you were searching for in your review of "Unhappy Lesbians" describing "two people singing at each other" is........... "duet".
Thou pribbling sheep-biting death-token!
(My first use of the "Insult" button and I've gotta say, I reckon it's a winner. How it so aptly summed up JB is beyond me - as most things to do with computers are.)
Walter PlingeTue, 16 Oct 2001, 09:44 am
RE: Les Mis - not really a review
Apologies. IÂ’d classify a duet as two people singing the same song together. Is there a different term for two people singing different songs against each other? Okay, okay, itÂ’s technically the same song, but theyÂ’re not singing the same words, tune or rhythm. DoesnÂ’t that distinguish it from, "I am sixteen, going on seventeenÂ…."? Thou venomed tickle-brained barnacle!
This time I thought IÂ’d give you a break and have a jibe at Meadows instead. Nothing like spreading the love aroundÂ….
JB
This time I thought IÂ’d give you a break and have a jibe at Meadows instead. Nothing like spreading the love aroundÂ….
JB
Walter PlingeTue, 16 Oct 2001, 10:25 am
RE: Les Mis - not really a review
I think it may be called a counter-point duet.
Walter PlingeTue, 16 Oct 2001, 11:35 am
RE: Les Mis - not really a review
As long as your not spreading anything else with your love!!! Meadows has enough problems in that regard.
Walter PlingeTue, 16 Oct 2001, 12:43 pm
RE: Les Mis - not really a review
You guys are incorrigible! Keep it up! HA! HA! I haven't stopped laughing yet. HEE! HEE!
By the way Dean, did you mean to "pribble" or "dribble"? Just wondering?
I haven't been to the show yet but I would love to go. Jarrod, that friend of yours...how good a friend?
By the way Dean, did you mean to "pribble" or "dribble"? Just wondering?
I haven't been to the show yet but I would love to go. Jarrod, that friend of yours...how good a friend?
Walter PlingeTue, 16 Oct 2001, 03:24 pm
RE: Les Mis - not really a review
why thank you mr. Shh...ssshhhcc..ssccchh..uuuuuuu....SCHULZE. (and yes - i had too scroll upwards to find oiut the spoelling of YOUR name)
about mr buttery- he has me trained to write good things about him, write good reviews about his shows, and most importantly - spell his name right. i'm trained too well - i would never miss spell jarrods name.
xxAmanda
Thou gorbellied knotty-pated haggard! - well! i think thats the best sounding insult i've heard for a while!
about mr buttery- he has me trained to write good things about him, write good reviews about his shows, and most importantly - spell his name right. i'm trained too well - i would never miss spell jarrods name.
xxAmanda
Thou gorbellied knotty-pated haggard! - well! i think thats the best sounding insult i've heard for a while!
Amanda ChestertonTue, 16 Oct 2001, 06:44 pm
RE: Les Mis
>The lights went down and the voiceover began to tell us who would play which role. This >was all new to me. Apparently just about every character is played alternately by two
>or more different actors. I don't know why this is. Is it to give more people a go? Is it >to spread the load? Is it a safety net? Does more actors encourage more ticket-buying >family members? ;-) No, really, I'm interested to know - anyone got answers?
Director's argument: 'to save people's voices.'
Producer's argument: 'to have a safety net so we don't lose money.' (HIS words-NOT mine!!! I am not shitstirring!! I swear!!)
Production assistant's argument: 'to give more people a go'.
Which ever you pick, it's another mighty can of worms that I am leaving tightly sealed.
The reason not all names were called out: those principals who have the lions-share of performances (e.g. Jean Valjean, Ahab/Javert, Enjolras, Thenardier, me and Gill) are not announced before each performance as the chances of getting our swings are small. On the odd occasions our swings are on, their names are read out. Those people who really are sharing performances (e.g. Cosettes - old and young, Fantines, Mariuses) are read out every night as it changes every performance.
In other words, if someone's character/name isn't read out, you're getting the principal (the first name listed in the programme next to each character).
Amanda Chesterton
>or more different actors. I don't know why this is. Is it to give more people a go? Is it >to spread the load? Is it a safety net? Does more actors encourage more ticket-buying >family members? ;-) No, really, I'm interested to know - anyone got answers?
Director's argument: 'to save people's voices.'
Producer's argument: 'to have a safety net so we don't lose money.' (HIS words-NOT mine!!! I am not shitstirring!! I swear!!)
Production assistant's argument: 'to give more people a go'.
Which ever you pick, it's another mighty can of worms that I am leaving tightly sealed.
The reason not all names were called out: those principals who have the lions-share of performances (e.g. Jean Valjean, Ahab/Javert, Enjolras, Thenardier, me and Gill) are not announced before each performance as the chances of getting our swings are small. On the odd occasions our swings are on, their names are read out. Those people who really are sharing performances (e.g. Cosettes - old and young, Fantines, Mariuses) are read out every night as it changes every performance.
In other words, if someone's character/name isn't read out, you're getting the principal (the first name listed in the programme next to each character).
Amanda Chesterton
Eliot McCannTue, 16 Oct 2001, 07:34 pm
NO!! You are forbidden!!
Jenny McCann wrote:
-------------------------------
I haven't been to the show yet but I would love to go.
NO!!! I forbid it! You're babbling, woman!!
NO nonononononono!! A frillion times NO!!! I hate the bastard show!! NO!!!!
Oh what, just YOU??? Yeah, fine.
Eliot (because it's all about me!)
"Thou droning doghearted giglet!"
And what, pray, is a giglet? Wasn't it a show with Sally Field in the '60s?
-------------------------------
I haven't been to the show yet but I would love to go.
NO!!! I forbid it! You're babbling, woman!!
NO nonononononono!! A frillion times NO!!! I hate the bastard show!! NO!!!!
Oh what, just YOU??? Yeah, fine.
Eliot (because it's all about me!)
"Thou droning doghearted giglet!"
And what, pray, is a giglet? Wasn't it a show with Sally Field in the '60s?
Walter PlingeTue, 16 Oct 2001, 11:34 pm
Not so miserable Les Mis
Wow! What a fantastic production - with such a fabulous Perth cast! I was particularly glad to see so many young people involved in this famous and historically significant show.
The entire cast was extremely talented - even the chorus members gained individual personalities throughout the show.
The direction was splendid and was very true to the story, music and history of the stage show (I don't know the director's name, I couldn't afford a programme - hence no upcoming mention of individual actors in this review).
The thing looked really professional - is it compulsory to have 'amateur production' on every poster around town? I thought it could stand up to the best of them and I've seen huge shows overseas. *A minor gripe - the advertising posters were really bad, the purple background was nice but not for LES MISERABLES, and why was the Cosette pic so small and centred? That didn't seem to deter the large crowd*
I loved Madame Thenardie (I saw the smaller one, my friend said she had seen a bigger girl playing the role who was also wonderful - the best of both worlds) and she was very well balanced with Mr Thenardie.
Fontine was fantastic, as was Eponine - they both brought out intense emotions in me, breaking down my very macho exterior - but hey, it's musical theatre! And the kid, dying - oh my god! Let's see him up against Hayley Joel Osmond whatever his name is at the next Oscars.
Any minor gripes or technical issues I may have noticed disappeared as the final song was sung by the entire cast - what amazing voices.
I really hope the cast involved enjoyed every minute of this show, they looked like they were having a ball (miserably, of course). I'm sure the show will be remembered by them as well as the audience as an exhilarating experience. It must have been brilliant to be involved in such a superb local production of Les Miserables - if I could sing, dance or act, I'd be right up there with you!
The entire cast was extremely talented - even the chorus members gained individual personalities throughout the show.
The direction was splendid and was very true to the story, music and history of the stage show (I don't know the director's name, I couldn't afford a programme - hence no upcoming mention of individual actors in this review).
The thing looked really professional - is it compulsory to have 'amateur production' on every poster around town? I thought it could stand up to the best of them and I've seen huge shows overseas. *A minor gripe - the advertising posters were really bad, the purple background was nice but not for LES MISERABLES, and why was the Cosette pic so small and centred? That didn't seem to deter the large crowd*
I loved Madame Thenardie (I saw the smaller one, my friend said she had seen a bigger girl playing the role who was also wonderful - the best of both worlds) and she was very well balanced with Mr Thenardie.
Fontine was fantastic, as was Eponine - they both brought out intense emotions in me, breaking down my very macho exterior - but hey, it's musical theatre! And the kid, dying - oh my god! Let's see him up against Hayley Joel Osmond whatever his name is at the next Oscars.
Any minor gripes or technical issues I may have noticed disappeared as the final song was sung by the entire cast - what amazing voices.
I really hope the cast involved enjoyed every minute of this show, they looked like they were having a ball (miserably, of course). I'm sure the show will be remembered by them as well as the audience as an exhilarating experience. It must have been brilliant to be involved in such a superb local production of Les Miserables - if I could sing, dance or act, I'd be right up there with you!
HammoWed, 17 Oct 2001, 07:32 am
RE: Les Mis
And where, oh where, is the Mighty Review Master?
I had heard tell he was in the house on opening night - so I dutifully logged in on the weekend, expecting an incredibly exhaustive (and exhausting) review on his favourite show...
But no...
Maybe, oh RM, you are taking a week to write your magical review - but perhaps it is time to lose the 'R' part of your name. WHERE IS THE REVIEW 'MASTER'?
j
I had heard tell he was in the house on opening night - so I dutifully logged in on the weekend, expecting an incredibly exhaustive (and exhausting) review on his favourite show...
But no...
Maybe, oh RM, you are taking a week to write your magical review - but perhaps it is time to lose the 'R' part of your name. WHERE IS THE REVIEW 'MASTER'?
j
Walter PlingeWed, 17 Oct 2001, 10:45 am
RE: Les Mis - not really a review
Ahh yes Amanda! Training young girls is one of Jarrods major interests in life. Admittedly "spelling" is usually a long way down the list (and most of the girls have left him and are considering pressing charges by that stage), but I can tell that in your case, our own Dr. Doolittle has performed his tasks brillyantly.
Walter PlingeWed, 17 Oct 2001, 12:49 pm
RE: Les Mis
>In other words, if someone's character/name isn't read out, >you're getting the principal (the first name listed in the >programme next to each character).
That is (of course) unless you're doing the PR, then you can be named at EVERY performance!!
*ROWR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*
That is (of course) unless you're doing the PR, then you can be named at EVERY performance!!
*ROWR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*
Walter PlingeWed, 17 Oct 2001, 12:50 pm
RE: Les Mis
>I also liked the guy who played the leader of the guys who >decide to build a barricade. Good presence and voice, although >didn't quite reach the high note. Maybe it was a bad day.
And which day was that?!
And which day was that?!
Amanda ChestertonWed, 17 Oct 2001, 01:03 pm
RE: Les Mis
Simon Holt wrote:
-------------------------------
>>I also liked the guy who played the leader of the guys who >decide to build a barricade. >>Good presence and voice, although >didn't quite reach the high note. Maybe it was a bad >>day.
>
>And which day was that?!
Sunday matinee, Simey.
Don't worry - I have it on good authority that Jarrod is resoundingly tone deaf with conductive hearing loss to boot ;-)
Either that or you can just tell people it wasn't you on that day - I won't tell :-)
Amanda Chesterton
-------------------------------
>>I also liked the guy who played the leader of the guys who >decide to build a barricade. >>Good presence and voice, although >didn't quite reach the high note. Maybe it was a bad >>day.
>
>And which day was that?!
Sunday matinee, Simey.
Don't worry - I have it on good authority that Jarrod is resoundingly tone deaf with conductive hearing loss to boot ;-)
Either that or you can just tell people it wasn't you on that day - I won't tell :-)
Amanda Chesterton
Walter PlingeWed, 17 Oct 2001, 01:09 pm
RE: Les Mis
I seem to recall I had an excellent day on Sunday with every note pitched perfectly (as usual!) ;-)
Yes, must be tone deaf. Then again, it could be the microphones. They have habit of completely @!#$ up don't they? ;-)
Yes, must be tone deaf. Then again, it could be the microphones. They have habit of completely @!#$ up don't they? ;-)
Walter PlingeWed, 17 Oct 2001, 05:05 pm
RE: NO!! You are forbidden!!
:) Just thought I should add to these strings - they're strangely compelling really... you keep reading through the drivel hoping to find a gem...
This isn't it... but for what it's worth: the first time I saw Les Mis it was in London many moons ago, and I spent a large part of the show in the foyer coughing my lungs up... When I came back Cosette was all grown up & all sorts of plot lines had developed. I didn't have a clue what was going on, but I still enjoyed it!
I've since seen the whole thing, but I still remember fondly that faintly bemused feeling... feeling stirred by songs yet not knowing who the good/bad guys or love interests/parents were...
Ok Finished now.
This isn't it... but for what it's worth: the first time I saw Les Mis it was in London many moons ago, and I spent a large part of the show in the foyer coughing my lungs up... When I came back Cosette was all grown up & all sorts of plot lines had developed. I didn't have a clue what was going on, but I still enjoyed it!
I've since seen the whole thing, but I still remember fondly that faintly bemused feeling... feeling stirred by songs yet not knowing who the good/bad guys or love interests/parents were...
Ok Finished now.
Walter PlingeWed, 17 Oct 2001, 06:16 pm
RE: Les Mis
I am so, so sorry. Look at what I started. The floodgates have opened and there's never a little Dutch boy to stick his finger in the dyke when you need one.
Thanks to Amanda and "Em Nippy" who answered my questions, and to Dean Schulze who proves, yet again, if you can't be a good example, at least serve as a horrible warning.
"How good a friend," Jenny? Probably not anymore after that 322 page smartarsed review....
Dean revealed, "Training young girls is one of Jarrod's major interests in life." Indeed. Keep watching this page for more "classes". And NO Dean, the last time you operated the camera it came out worse than The Blair Witch Project.
Simon asked, "And which day was that?!" - I'm sure I mentioned somewhere in my 568 page review that it was Sunday, but you can be forgiven for only skimming it.
Someone thought I was a little bit picky. The lucky fellow obviously has the good fortune not to have met me and thus discovered in real life that I'm actually a REALLY picky bastard.
Amanda said, "I have it on good authority that Jarrod is resoundingly tone deaf with conductive hearing loss to boot." Well, if you WILL scream, "OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD," into my ears at the top of your lungs (before breaking into yet ANOTHER ribald version of 'Master of the House') during your" training", then I can hardly be blamed, now can I?
Once again, as I did in my 1013 page review, I can but agree with Simon about the microphones.
JB
Thanks to Amanda and "Em Nippy" who answered my questions, and to Dean Schulze who proves, yet again, if you can't be a good example, at least serve as a horrible warning.
"How good a friend," Jenny? Probably not anymore after that 322 page smartarsed review....
Dean revealed, "Training young girls is one of Jarrod's major interests in life." Indeed. Keep watching this page for more "classes". And NO Dean, the last time you operated the camera it came out worse than The Blair Witch Project.
Simon asked, "And which day was that?!" - I'm sure I mentioned somewhere in my 568 page review that it was Sunday, but you can be forgiven for only skimming it.
Someone thought I was a little bit picky. The lucky fellow obviously has the good fortune not to have met me and thus discovered in real life that I'm actually a REALLY picky bastard.
Amanda said, "I have it on good authority that Jarrod is resoundingly tone deaf with conductive hearing loss to boot." Well, if you WILL scream, "OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD," into my ears at the top of your lungs (before breaking into yet ANOTHER ribald version of 'Master of the House') during your" training", then I can hardly be blamed, now can I?
Once again, as I did in my 1013 page review, I can but agree with Simon about the microphones.
JB
crgwllmsWed, 17 Oct 2001, 07:04 pm
Giglet grows up
Eliot McCann wrote:
-------------------------------
>>"And what, pray, is a giglet? Wasn't it a show with Sally Field in the '60s?"
I found these definitions of "gig" in the Concise Oxford
1 a light two-wheeled one-horse carriage.
2 a light ship's boat for rowing or sailing.
3 a rowing boat esp. for racing.
4 Middle English, perhaps originally = a flighty girl
5 a kind of fishing spear.
short for fizgig, fishgig: cf. Spanish fisga 'harpoon'
6 an engagement of an entertainer, esp. of musicians to play jazz, pop, or dance music, usu. for a single appearance.
7 a performance of this kind.
I would assume "giglet" in the insult refers to a small version of definition 4.
The "Gidget" character in the 60's film (Sally Field took the role later when it went to television) was a slang nickname from surfing culture for a combination of "girl" + "midget" = "gidget"
Cheers,
Craig
~<8>-/===/---------
Thou rank hasty-witted maggot-pie!
-------------------------------
>>"And what, pray, is a giglet? Wasn't it a show with Sally Field in the '60s?"
I found these definitions of "gig" in the Concise Oxford
1 a light two-wheeled one-horse carriage.
2 a light ship's boat for rowing or sailing.
3 a rowing boat esp. for racing.
4 Middle English, perhaps originally = a flighty girl
5 a kind of fishing spear.
short for fizgig, fishgig: cf. Spanish fisga 'harpoon'
6 an engagement of an entertainer, esp. of musicians to play jazz, pop, or dance music, usu. for a single appearance.
7 a performance of this kind.
I would assume "giglet" in the insult refers to a small version of definition 4.
The "Gidget" character in the 60's film (Sally Field took the role later when it went to television) was a slang nickname from surfing culture for a combination of "girl" + "midget" = "gidget"
Cheers,
Craig
~<8>-/===/---------
Thou rank hasty-witted maggot-pie!
MuSiCaLs_FaNWed, 17 Oct 2001, 10:02 pm
Gidget
Well it's good to see someone knows who "Gidget" is!!! I was beginning to lose faith in humanity so thankyou!!!!!!:)
crgwllmsThu, 18 Oct 2001, 12:39 am
But...?
Jarrod Buttery wrote:
-------------------------------
>>" I can but agree with Simon about the microphones. "
So you don't agree?
Or shouldn't it be "I can't but agree.." or "I can naught but agree.."? Or just, "I can agree"?
Or is this a reference to your surname? You can "But-agree" ?
Or maybe this is some unsavoury talk about butts again..? If so, I hope they weren't shotgun mic's.
Craig
~<8>-/=====/-------------
Thou paunchy beef-witted coxcomb!
-------------------------------
>>" I can but agree with Simon about the microphones. "
So you don't agree?
Or shouldn't it be "I can't but agree.." or "I can naught but agree.."? Or just, "I can agree"?
Or is this a reference to your surname? You can "But-agree" ?
Or maybe this is some unsavoury talk about butts again..? If so, I hope they weren't shotgun mic's.
Craig
~<8>-/=====/-------------
Thou paunchy beef-witted coxcomb!
Walter PlingeThu, 18 Oct 2001, 03:44 pm
RE: But...?
And then, just to confuse us all, the lemon-rasperry lounge goat fell from the automobile, decemating an entire keychain (which, by itself is not something, but in itself is something forewith, and which may be referred to from whence it is not known, as a "purple encrusted anemone", not withstanding any such references to the anal region of the derelicts whom we shall discuss further in the latter day).
So what's the answer?
[Alan!]
So what's the answer?
[Alan!]
Walter PlingeThu, 18 Oct 2001, 09:30 pm
RE: Giglet grows up
You have far too much time on your hands, young man:)
crgwllmsFri, 19 Oct 2001, 01:10 am
RE: Giglet grows up
sorcha wrote:
-------------------------------
>>>You have far too much time on your hands, young man:)
Yes I know. Occupational hazard...!
~<8>-/================/-----------
Walter PlingeThu, 25 Oct 2001, 10:58 pm
RE: Les Mis
It's been forever since i been in here and havin a good ol' read..........Jarrod...admit it..YOU DO LOVE MUSICALS!!!!
well you enjoyed cabaret if i remember rightly.....
i dare you...admit it.....
well you enjoyed cabaret if i remember rightly.....
i dare you...admit it.....
Walter PlingeFri, 26 Oct 2001, 09:41 am
RE: Les Mis
Must admit, I've always thought of Jarrod as someone with a soft spot for "hoofers".
Thou bawdy swag-bellied bladder! (love that button!!!)
Thou bawdy swag-bellied bladder! (love that button!!!)
Walter PlingeTue, 30 Oct 2001, 07:12 pm
RE: Les Mis
JB, like your style. Love someone who can take a non pretentious approach to theatre, and takes the piss out of not "knowing everything".... well done.